Started By
Message

re: New billionaire's tax plan aimed at the 0.0002%

Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:23 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23260 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

a plan that would tax the stocks and bonds of the wealthiest 0.0002 percent


Hell. fricking. No.

The second this happens, they will look for ways to expand that .002% to 20%.

Anyone who supports this kind of taxation needs a kick in the nuts.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

That's why I said this would affect people downstream from the intended targets 100x more than the intended targets
I was not born wealthy. But I was able to use a wealthy person's money to build my business. Without their at-risk capital... I'd still be as poor as the family I was born into.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

You're not this obtuse.
That's true. The is nothing obtuse about what I wrote.

quote:

The point being made is the SJW/Covid bullshite the middle class/upper-middle class has been assaulted by finds its political and financial roots with these assholes.
Nope. Lots of people not on that list voted for Democrats in congress and Joe Biden for president. Also plenty of elections before 2020.

quote:

And the overriding point is, "frick them, why shouldn't they have to live with the politics they bought/paid for?"

Because a stupid idea is stupid. By your logic we should forfeit every game to show how bad SEC officials are. While screaming "we can't win because the refs are so bad!!".

If anyone is being obtuse it's you. Simultaneously thinking the ultra-wealthy run everything while also thinking that the ultra wealthy actually want higher taxes on themselves is silly.

If first premise is true -- why don't they have higher taxes on themselves? HINT: because their public personas don't match their actions.

WHy not? Because they are trying to appease the mob in hopes of being left alone. If they say "I want higher taxes" no one shows up to protest on their lawn. But even a peep about something conservative and the mob shows up to ruin them.
This post was edited on 10/24/21 at 10:41 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Anyone who supports this kind of taxation needs a kick in the nuts.
And no one has ever explained what happens when those stocks and bonds go down in value. Do "the rich" get a tax refund on those losses?
Posted by phaz
Waddell, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
6848 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 12:04 am to
Look up the estate taxes, it will greatly affect many of us.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95632 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 12:07 am to
The narrower this thing gets, the closer it gets to being a bill of attainder.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22714 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 12:35 am to
quote:

If anyone is being obtuse it's you. Simultaneously thinking the ultra-wealthy run everything while also thinking that the ultra wealthy actually want higher taxes on themselves is silly.

You prove obtuse on both counts here.

I don’t know what to tell you if you don’t understand who is pulling the strings of the puppets in the WH and Congress.

And nobody is arguing that the wealthy want to be taxed more. What’s being argued is the politics they espouse/fund include a faction that supports a wealth tax, but they rely on useful idiots on the Right to keep them from having to live with the shitty side of the politics they clearly fund/advance.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 12:52 am
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:07 am to
quote:

Without their at-risk capital... I'd still be as poor as the family I was born into.


K now do taxes.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:28 am to
quote:

I don’t know what to tell you if you don’t understand who is pulling the strings of the puppets in the WH and Congress.

And nobody is arguing that the wealthy want to be taxed more
Then you have no point.

quote:

What’s being argued is the politics they espouse/fund include a faction that supports a wealth tax, but they rely on useful idiots on the Right to keep them from having to live with the shitty side of the politics they clearly fund/advance.
Thats nice. But it’s not an argument of merit. None of that makes it a good idea. And I explained why it’s happening.

So why are you a proponent of a bad idea?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 2:31 am to
quote:

K now do taxes.
Paying taxes played no role in increasing my wealth. Are you confused?
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
20916 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 3:12 am to
You’re really fisking stupid if you think even if such a “tax” ever got passed they’d pay an extra cent.

There’s a reason K street exists you know
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Paying taxes played no role in increasing my wealth.



Wrong.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299277 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Wrong.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299277 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

And the overriding point is, "frick them, why shouldn't they have to live with the politics they bought/paid for?"


Do you have some kind of issue with that?

You don't think people should get the government they want?
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7178 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Now, the government will take some just because it is there? Will they give the money back if it loses?


Just because it is theoretically there...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299277 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Are you confused?




Taxes are the holy grail for Marxists.

they've never met one they didn't like.

My taxes go to the Beltway Mansions. I know where they go.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7178 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Thats nice. But it’s not an argument of merit. None of that makes it a good idea. And I explained why it’s happening.


This is a horrid idea that is going to have negative effects on anybody with money in the market.

I think a better idea would be to require minimum distributions on brokerage accounts valued over some undgodly number, say 10 billion. That way some gains must be realized and become taxable.

The other thing that I could get behind is a form of alternative minimum tax for individuals who take portfolio loans in excess of some big number, and report income less than some big number.

I am about as far right as you can be on taxation, but it is absolute bull shite that someone like Musk or Bezos could in theory, take a modest salary, say take out a billion dollar portfolio loan, and qualify for shite like the child tax credit and EITC.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Wrong
you’re going to have to explain how expenditures increase my wealth.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63313 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I think a better idea would be to require minimum distributions on brokerage accounts valued over some undgodly number, say 10 billion. That way some gains must be realized and become taxable.
no functionally different than taxing it directly.

quote:

The other thing that I could get behind is a form of alternative minimum tax for individuals who take portfolio loans in excess of some big number, and report income less than some big number.
We should do the same with home loans and home equity loans. Count everyone’s mortgage as income.

quote:

it is absolute bull shite that someone like Musk or Bezos could in theory, take a modest salary, say take out a billion dollar portfolio loan, and qualify for shite like the child tax credit and EITC.
Thsu proving…

quote:

The narrower this thing gets, the closer it gets to being a bill of attainder.
If you want a government to go after specific unpopular people just say so. it worked well for Zimbabwe.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 1:21 pm
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 10/25/21 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

you’re going to have to explain how expenditures increase my wealth.


You can't be serious?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram