re: Need an explanation on homosexuality

quote:

---

So this evidence is indisputable

---

Correct

The fact that some people try to dispute it doesnt make it disputable, it just makes those people ignorant.

quote:

---

Which of these women are biologically more beautiful?

---

Comparison of apples to cantaloupes Suffice it to say the blondes features are not entirely unenhanced biology.

quote:

---

Correct The fact that some people try to dispute it doesnt make it disputable, it just makes those people ignorant.

---

Au contraire. You are so set in your belief system that you are fully unwilling to entertain a view which is contrary to the view you espouse to the point where if anyone dares to assail your firmly held beliefs of the infallibility of this "evidence", you are more than willing to assail their intellect.

Climate change/Global warming/Global cooling subscribers have the same rigid view of their belief system as well. For the longest time their "evidence" was unassailable and set in stone and it was held as the gospel truth in scientific circles, pop culture, and the media. However much of this has been proven false, altered, or doctored to fit the agenda and belief system. Much of the evidence you could provide to prove your set of beliefs on evolution is actually questionable but you will never see it as such.

By the way, I of such small minded views have not once resorted to calling you a name or challenged your intellectual capacity...since you are so keen on proof, how about proving you are capable of debate without cheap shots??? I have confidence that you can pull that off...

quote:

---

Climate change/Global warming/Global cooling subscribers have the same rigid view of their belief system as well.

---

I love when people mention climate change in an effort to cast doubt on evolution. It essentially outs them as an individual who gets his exposure to science not from firsthand education, research or training, but the political news stand. Not really worth the time debating with.

quote:

---

The evidence for climate change is not comparable to that of evolution

---

It isn't? Go tell that to someone who believes in global warming. I don't buy GW but at least we can observe changes in climate whether you think it is on the grandiose scale the GW crowd believes it to be or not.

quote:

---

Your post in nonsense.

---

LOL! Just can't resist can you?

quote:

---

I'm pretty sure pedophiles don't choose to be sexually attracted to kids. Should thd same argument apply to them?

---

No. We do not define right or wrong solely in terms of desire though.

Two men desire each other. They have sex. Who loses? Not the other straight men, more women. Not the gay men, they get what they want and aren´t forced to hide/repress their feelings.

A man wants to have sex with a child. He does. Who loses? The child. So we don´t allow that.

Pretty simple. Their is a difference between consenting adults and one person raping a child. Any alternative argument is merely an absurd attempt to ignore that and use a warped moral view point to try and shame others.

quote:

---

---

This was when Pam was actually hot and an obsession for most men.

God bless her soul now.

quote:

---

No evidence of either one.

When you run across a ling to man get back with me.

---

Just out of curiosity, what do you think neanderthals were? I'm not suggesting that man evolved from them, just wondering what you think.

quote:

---

Go tell that to someone who believes in global warming

---

What do you mean "believes" in global warming? Global warming is a fact, the issue is whether or not man is the primary driving force behind. Among those who hold to the hypothesis of AGW, none will claim the evidence for it is equivalent to that of evolution.

And we absolutely do observe evolution. Google ring species if you are interested.

quote:

---

There is always burden when positive assertion is made. In this case it was.

"Natural selection is an unconscious process."

That is not a statement you'd have made on you own.
I suspect, had you recognized its indefensibility, it is not a statement you would have tried to address.

Yet here you are

---

If you want to split hairs, I should have said, "There is no evidence to suggest that nature is conscious. In my years studying physical science and acquiring degrees in physical science, I have observed that the majority of scientists do not believe nature to be conscious. For these reasons, I do not believe nature to be conscious, and you are very likely to be wrong for asserting otherwise." But for sake of conversation, I paraphrased, and said simply, from the perspective of my background in the sciences, that nature is not conscious.

At any rate, you said it was demonstrably false that nature is unconscious, meaning that you believe there is substantial evidence to prove that nature is conscious. Please present your evidence.