Started By
Message

re: Nancy Mace has the names of those who have used the sex harassment slush fund since 2004

Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167597 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:41 pm to
Someone else released these names a month or so ago. Or was it her? It was a lot more names.

Nothing happens.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16731 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:44 pm to
This is the least shocking waste of taxpayer funds.

Posted by lsujunky
Down By The River
Member since Jun 2011
2697 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

All records prior to 2004 were destroyed


How convenient.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13871 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

2014: Blake Farenthold ($84,000)


That pic.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17137 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Only 9 since 2004?

I'd have figured it was significantly higher.

*ETA: not even 9. Eric Massa has 3 and John Conyers has 2. So 6


And it doesnt add up to 17 mil.
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
9552 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:12 pm to
That can't be close to accurate.

Nancy giving out trinkets.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23831 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:13 pm to
I know some of us don't always agree on everything.... but the fact that there is a "fund" which exists of OUR tax dollars to pay off elected Congressional leaders should in itself warrant a revolution.

If we the people allow this, there's no hope for us. We are responsible for the destruction of this great nation.

I'm open to anyone's argument.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37618 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:18 pm to
The amounts seem low for paying off someone.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102783 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:23 pm to
Well this is the biggest nothingburger of all nothingburgers
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
6609 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Nancy giving out trinkets.


More than anyone else has ever given. I like the way to criticize the messenger instead of the slush fund users.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26240 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

i still dont understand how this fund can even exist.


They'll probably tell you that it is cheaper to settle these "frivolous" lawsuits than to go to court and spend several thousand dollars to defend them. A civil defendant always requires a settlement agreement that has language that makes it clear there is no admission of liability, and that the terms of the agreement are confidential.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19361 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:46 pm to
Hmm , isn’t it illegal to destroy government documents of any kind
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22089 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:54 pm to
But why isn’t it from their own money? Why are tax payers required to fund it?
Posted by sc2anni
at my desk
Member since Feb 2023
616 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:49 am to
Because they are the elite and so far above us peons.

Time to vote out all incumbents. Even if you like your guy/gal. If they have been there a few years they have learned all the dirty tricks and are no longer representing you.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6677 posts
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:28 am to
Everyone has a list.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram