- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My question is how did she construct this lie?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to stat19
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to stat19
quote:
There is no way that meek, frightened little lamb that testified yesterday is a Psych Professor.
You think what she did yesterday is the same as giving a Psych lecture to some college kids?

Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to Stidham8
She went to Holton Arms. Prep kids don’t really hang out with HA girls. HA girls hang out with Landon dudes. Landon and Prep are main rivals. Word is she was a big slut. My guess is she dated a Landon guy (or guys) who hated Kavanaugh (Football & Basketball capitan) and she mixed up an assault with Kavanaugh.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to Stidham8
I think she is mentally ill.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to Stidham8
Nobody dares to ask what a 15 year old girl had to drink at an upperclassmen house party. They don’t want to victim shame. She said one beer. Maybe it was more. Maybe she got foggy and near blackout.
Not recalling how she escaped what would be the most horrific experience of her young life? Where were her friends? Did they ditch her? Did they set her up? They bring her to get fricked by the guys? Can’t ask any of that.
But a Democrat plot? No. You’d have to find an unworking Oscar caliber actress. To pull all of that off. That was the personification of a near panic attack prior to her testimony. Not to mention she is a real person with a home and a job. She’s not some mystery person you can’t find.
Not recalling how she escaped what would be the most horrific experience of her young life? Where were her friends? Did they ditch her? Did they set her up? They bring her to get fricked by the guys? Can’t ask any of that.
But a Democrat plot? No. You’d have to find an unworking Oscar caliber actress. To pull all of that off. That was the personification of a near panic attack prior to her testimony. Not to mention she is a real person with a home and a job. She’s not some mystery person you can’t find.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:50 am to el Gaucho
quote:
Nobody would sexually assault such an ugly woman
You’re pathetic
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:51 am to Stidham8
Just a guess on my part.
Blasey Ford first started mentioning this "alleged assault" to her husband/friends/therapist around 2012.
This was supposedly the "first time" she had mentioned the alleged assault to anyone since it had supposedly happened in 1982.
2012 was when Mitt Romney first mentioned Brett Kavanaugh as a possible Supreme Court pick if he won.
This started as an idea in her head. It grew from there.
I believe she probably mentioned to her friends she could stop the nomination if she wanted to. Her friends/husband probably pushed her from there. They all are probably far left hard core loons.
This is all just a guess.
Blasey Ford first started mentioning this "alleged assault" to her husband/friends/therapist around 2012.
This was supposedly the "first time" she had mentioned the alleged assault to anyone since it had supposedly happened in 1982.
2012 was when Mitt Romney first mentioned Brett Kavanaugh as a possible Supreme Court pick if he won.
This started as an idea in her head. It grew from there.
I believe she probably mentioned to her friends she could stop the nomination if she wanted to. Her friends/husband probably pushed her from there. They all are probably far left hard core loons.
This is all just a guess.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:51 am to Stidham8
I’m not saying she is lying.
But do you know how easy it would be for me to make something up almost more believable than what Ford said?
For example, let’s assume a woman was the nominee. Let’s also assume that I was a student of hers at Harvard. Let’s call her Jane doe.
“I’ll never forget how Professor Doe treated me while I was a student in her classroom. One day after class she asked me to
Visit her office to discuss a paper I had written. We talked for about 15 minutes about the paper and then the conversation turned. Professor Doe walked around her desk and stood in front of me. Without saying a word she placed her hand on my genitals. She thanked me for coming to visit and said she was glad I was in her class. I moved my seat back quickly away from her and began to explain that I was very uncomfortable. At that point Professor Doe became very defensive and said if I ever speak of this she would ensure I would be kicked out of the university. I left quickly and never spoke of this for fear of losing my future as a lawyer. When Jane Doe was nominated to the Supreme Court I knew I had to say something.”
See I did that off the top of my head. Give me an hour and I could make it much better.
But do you know how easy it would be for me to make something up almost more believable than what Ford said?
For example, let’s assume a woman was the nominee. Let’s also assume that I was a student of hers at Harvard. Let’s call her Jane doe.
“I’ll never forget how Professor Doe treated me while I was a student in her classroom. One day after class she asked me to
Visit her office to discuss a paper I had written. We talked for about 15 minutes about the paper and then the conversation turned. Professor Doe walked around her desk and stood in front of me. Without saying a word she placed her hand on my genitals. She thanked me for coming to visit and said she was glad I was in her class. I moved my seat back quickly away from her and began to explain that I was very uncomfortable. At that point Professor Doe became very defensive and said if I ever speak of this she would ensure I would be kicked out of the university. I left quickly and never spoke of this for fear of losing my future as a lawyer. When Jane Doe was nominated to the Supreme Court I knew I had to say something.”
See I did that off the top of my head. Give me an hour and I could make it much better.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:52 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
You’d have to find an unworking Oscar caliber actress. To pull all of that off. That was the personification of a near panic attack prior to her testimony. Not to mention she is a real person with a home and a job. She’s not some mystery person you can’t find.
You’re making way too much sense for these people?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:52 am to Stidham8
quote:
If I had to give a best guess, she probably had known of Mark Judge, Kavanaugh, and PJ but never hungout with him or were really friends with them. TDS got to her BAD. She couldn’t handle Trump appointing another judge, and she knew she could craft a loose fitting story that would protect her from a perjury trap.
2 theories for me:
-Shes had a similar experience and over the years has become obsessed with BK and/or the Kavanaugh family and has convinced herself it was him, her mind fabricating missing pieces of the story until she believed it was a true memory
-She may have had some kind of experience like this, or possibly a friend but purposely fabricated a story that included BK. She got pissed at momma Kav for the whole foreclosure deal and made it a point to get back at the family somehow. She initially made these claims, thinking it would deter Trump from picking BK and prevent him ever becoming a SC judge, never thinking shed be outed and have to publically answer her claim. Once she was outed she was unable to walk it back and had to procede.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:52 am to ChineseBandit58
She’s a hired gun. Pure and simple. My question is if they actively recruited her, or if she approached them with a story to sell.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:52 am to BobBoucher
quote:
she’s a sociopath
I saw DiGenova last night, and apparently a lot of these people know her father, something to do with a Country Club.
DiGenova said something to the fact that this woman was a mess, as far back as 40 yrs ago, and her parents had to get her out of town.
I think the quote was " shipped off to the west coast "
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:52 am to BobBoucher
quote:
If yesterday was acting, she’s a sociopath.
You have to consider the Liberal mind. These are the people who think dudes with balls swinging between their legs are in reality women that should be able to compete in all-women competitions. THINK ABOUT THAT!
Then there's the whole "her truth" nonsense vs. just THE TRUTH.
It is not a far leap whatsoever... in fact it's merely a small step.... for her to convince herself that "her truth" is telling her "inner-self" that the "emotional rape" of Trump putting another justice on the court is in "her reality" the time Judge K held his hand over her mouth... etc.
These people do not simply have a different perspective. They are absolutely, clinically insane. Unfortunately for the rest of our country, the psychiatric doctors are the very same people.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:54 am to BobBoucher
quote:
If yesterday was acting, she’s a sociopath.
Did she come across to you like someone with a PhD and three other degrees, all from 4 rather prestigious schools?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:55 am to Stidham8
Best guess is that something did happen to her at some point, but didn’t have a name. This nomination comes along and it becomes very easy to slip Kav into the attacker role in her story.
My best guess is that the guy she refused to name was probably her actual attacker. She testified that she had gone out with him for several months but not dated. Also talked about that relationship not continuing long after the attack. Couple that with the fact that this guy was the same guy that another person a week ago said it could possibly be because he looked similar to Kav but also because his house had a very similar floorplan
My best guess is that the guy she refused to name was probably her actual attacker. She testified that she had gone out with him for several months but not dated. Also talked about that relationship not continuing long after the attack. Couple that with the fact that this guy was the same guy that another person a week ago said it could possibly be because he looked similar to Kav but also because his house had a very similar floorplan
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:55 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Because it is easier to believe that she is lying than the others who she is relying on to corroborate her story but actually contradict it.
Why do you assume she is lying?
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:55 am to Stidham8
Her 4 “witnesses” have all given sworn statements that this didn’t happen yet the liberals and MSM continue to ignore this and these people...
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:56 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why do you assume she is lying?
First, we are still waiting to see one person who can corroborate her story and any other factual evidence. She has named a number of people as witnesses and no one supports her.
There are too many gaps in her “truth”. She has not been forthcoming about recent information like if she gave reporters the notes from her psychologist. Claims she can’t understand simple things like if some has spoken to Dems on her behalf.
And this….
Blumenthal stated that jurors could rule a witness to be false in everything if she says one thing that is not true.
Well, we know Ford lied about air travel so everything Ford said is NOT TRUE according to his standard.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:58 am to Stidham8
It's possible that something happened to her at some point and when she saw BKs name on the short list she began assigning what happened to her to BK, either subconsciously or nefariously. She may have wanted it to remain confidential because she wasn't confident in her accusation, but then got caught up and used in political warfare that she couldn't escape.
Just a theory. I don't really know. It's possible she is telling the truth, though there isn't anything to corroborate it and there is some evidence refuting it.
Just a theory. I don't really know. It's possible she is telling the truth, though there isn't anything to corroborate it and there is some evidence refuting it.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 7:59 am to Stidham8
quote:
Any other theories out there?
Not a theory, but consider this:
Charles Manson had young girls kill 7 people because he thought the Beatles were telling him to do it through the lyrics of the White Album to start a race war so he could ultimately rule the country...
Some people are just plain crazy.
Maybe she is too.
Posted on 9/28/18 at 8:00 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why do you assume she is lying?
I listened to her story and then heard the only three people there say it never happened and concluded she was lying, very confused, or both.
Popular
Back to top
