- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Musk 'should not decide' how to run Twitter
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:25 pm
What in the actual frick? It's HIS Company and he can do whatever the hell he pleases with it. This fricking Lunatic Liberals have lost their minds
LINK
quote:
Conservatives on Wednesday ripped Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for her stern takedown of Elon Musk, in which she insisted that he "should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other" via his newly-purchased social media company, Twitter.
Warren suggested that Musk, as "one human being," has too much power over the platform and therefore speech. Critics of the Democratic lawmaker insisted, however, that she’s really just unhappy it’s not her or her ideological allies that run Twitter.
Warren made her comments to FOX Business reporter Hillary Vaughn while on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. Vaughn asked Warren whether Democrats had been picking on Musk over his handling of the platform, to which the senator curtly replied, "Elon Musk is doing just fine."
When pressed on whether "users have a right to freedom of speech, even if what they’re saying is wrong or offensive," the lawmaker referred to Musk, suggesting his ownership of the company puts free speech in danger.
"I think that one human being should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other, and it doesn't make any difference who that human being is. One human being should not be able to go into a dark room by himself and decide, 'Oh, that person gets heard from, that person doesn't.' That's not how it should work," Warren asserted.
Musk’s plans for Twitter have not included silencing users, however. He recently agreed to restoring previously banned accounts, and he reversed a Twitter COVID-19 policy that resulted in the suspension of over 11,000 accounts since 2020.
The only policy Musk has proposed for dealing with hate-filled posts is to limit their reach, not remove them or suspend the accounts posting them.
LINK
31
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:27 pm to Mr Boyles
They didn't give a shite when their team ran Twitter.
frick that buffalo shite eating squaw.
frick that buffalo shite eating squaw.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:29 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
Conservatives on Wednesday ripped Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for her stern takedown of Elon Musk, in which she insisted that he "should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other" via his newly-purchased social media company, Twitter.
People like Chief Spreading Bull don't really believe in the concept of private property.
Except for themselves, of course.
It's really a shame that it's only "conservatives" ripping into her over this. It ought to be anybody with a scintilla of common sense.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:32 pm to Mr Boyles
It's a private company. Who should decide?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:36 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
she insisted that he "should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other"
Isn't that exactly what he's trying to do... eliminate twitters barriers to communication?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:36 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
Musk 'should not decide' how to run Twitter
what did they say when the SJW ran twitter, they are a private company, a private company can do whatever it wants, and if you dont like it, go build your own twitter
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:38 pm to Mr Boyles
And she shouldn’t identify as Cherokee, but she did.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:39 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
Warren suggested that Musk, as "one human being," has too much power over the platform and therefore speech.
Dorsey was "one human being" too. And he crammed his ideology right down on everyone to deafening silence from Elizabeth Warren.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:39 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
Lunatic Liberals
quote:
lost their minds
Redundant
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:40 pm to Mr Boyles
The rules only apply to others when it serves their own personal agendas.
That's the (D) in "it's Different"
"Rules for thee, but not for me!"
That's the (D) in "it's Different"
"Rules for thee, but not for me!"
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:41 pm to Mr Boyles
Basically she, like most politicians, believe that governments should determine which opinions are allowed. Our government can control Twitter here, and the EU can control Twitter in Europe.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:59 pm to Mr Boyles
If she doesnt like the way it is run she should create her own platform.
Isnt that how they say it works?
Isnt that how they say it works?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:00 pm to Mr Boyles
Shucks! I wanted an Elon Phone!
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:02 pm to Mr Boyles
That histrionic bitch reminds me of Jane Hathaway
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:09 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
"I think that one human being should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other, and it doesn't make any difference who that human being is. One human being should not be able to go into a dark room by himself and decide, 'Oh, that person gets heard from, that person doesn't.' That's not how it should work," Warren asserted
Senator Warren, did you know that Elon allowed more people to decide what goes on Twitter by simply allowing Free speech?
it was the prior culture at Twitter that censored many americans...that's not okay...
we only need one person to keep the free speech gate open...so the people can be the people in charge
now kindly retire or shut up with your liberal nonesense
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:11 pm to Mr Boyles
Privately held company. BITCH.
He paid that much specifically to be able to do whatever the frick he wanted within legal rules, not having to answer to exterior shareholders.
He paid that much specifically to be able to do whatever the frick he wanted within legal rules, not having to answer to exterior shareholders.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:13 pm to Mr Boyles
squaw speak with forked tongue.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:14 pm to Mr Boyles
It's Elizabeth Warren, who cares?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:15 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
"I think that one human being should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other, and it doesn't make any difference who that human being is. One human being should not be able to go into a dark room by himself and decide, 'Oh, that person gets heard from, that person doesn't.' That's not how it should work," Warren asserted.
What else would you expect a Communist to say?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 3:18 pm to Mr Boyles
quote:
"I think that one human being should not decide how millions of people communicate with each other, and it doesn't make any difference who that human being is.
Liawatha didn't have a problem with Twitter when Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal were running the company.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News