- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Murkowski defends SAVE Act position in WSJ Column
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:58 pm to ragincajun03
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:58 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
where people live on top each other with a polling place on almost every corner should get the same accomodation
I think that could be solved by writing the provisions to where they clearly apply to Alaska and other widespread rural states and no one else. It could be done.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:01 pm to prplhze2000
Frick Murkowski, and frick Alaska’s rank choice. The only reason she is still in office is because of that fricked up voting process.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:08 pm to Jake88
quote:
Give us a break. "What about this 0.000001% example? We cant do it because of this!"
I guess voting isn't really a priority for those people. So boo fricking hoo. If voting is soooo damn important, then freaking take the time to do it.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:13 pm to antibarner
Dont be so sure about that. I have worked for years in Alaska. A lot of these places have no roads out of and the only way to get there is buy Plane so the Price can go up pretty damn quick $$$!
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:14 pm to prplhze2000
Complete and utter BS.
She was against it MONTHS AGO when there would have been plenty of time for legal voters to get their stuff together.
She was against it MONTHS AGO when there would have been plenty of time for legal voters to get their stuff together.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:22 pm to WhiteMandingo
quote:
How are these people voting anyway?
She forgot to mention because Alaska has many remote villages, the state also appoints deputy registrars in rural communities so residents do not have to travel long distances to register.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:25 pm to VOR
quote:
As it stands now, I’ve always shown ID when voting in person in La....Everything seems to be in order
and fraud seems very unlikely.
Ya think that's a coincidence?
You show your ID. Prove you are the person LEGALLY registered to vote. Fraud seems unlikely.
NO frickING shite!!!!!
Now do CA where no such safeguards exist.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:33 pm to prplhze2000
Carve out special circumstances for Alaska given its geographical hurdles.
Easy fix, but they don’t want it to happen.
Easy fix, but they don’t want it to happen.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:48 pm to prplhze2000
All those issues can be fixed with a relatively small amount of money.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:24 pm to prplhze2000
Her points make sense as far as Alaska goes but instead of killing the entire bill and hurting Americas future due to inconvenience of a few thousand people at best couldn’t we amend the bill to exempt Alaska or attack federal funds that go toward state election officials flying out to remote areas to register these people once a year and/or collect ballots?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:28 pm to deltaland
quote:
Her points make sense as far as Alaska goes but instead of killing the entire bill and hurting Americas future due to inconvenience of a few thousand people at best couldn’t we amend the bill to exempt Alaska or attack federal funds that go toward state election officials flying out to remote areas to register these people once a year and/or collect ballots?
Back in the past this would be quite reasonable to expect from Congress (thats typically how Alaska got things done at the Congressional level), nowadays politics and such arent common sense, nor is it reasonable.
This is why Congress has dismal approval rates...but each damn time it comes up for election, the general populace elects the same frickers all over again. And then when newcomers do come in? Sucked into the machine almost immediately for a majority of them that have any luck at getting re-elected (if they didnt bend knee to the political machines behind the scenes)
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:33 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
She makes a good point about getting ballots out in time this year. I deal with quite a few Circuit Clerks and it's pretty much too late to change ballots for November elections.
The election just slipped up on everyone
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:41 pm to prplhze2000
Doesn’t Donald Trump vote by mail? Good enough for him, good enough for Quinn the Eskimo
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:55 pm to prplhze2000
These same arguments could be used in response to requiring drivers licenses to drive a vehicle, to deposit cash at a bank, to board an airplane. It’s a retarded straw man. Murk has benefited from loose election security in her prior elections to maintain power. That’s all this is about.
Popular
Back to top


0







