Started By
Message

re: Murkowski defends SAVE Act position in WSJ Column

Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
18129 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

where people live on top each other with a polling place on almost every corner should get the same accomodation


I think that could be solved by writing the provisions to where they clearly apply to Alaska and other widespread rural states and no one else. It could be done.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
109136 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:01 pm to
Frick Murkowski, and frick Alaska’s rank choice. The only reason she is still in office is because of that fricked up voting process.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27488 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Give us a break. "What about this 0.000001% example? We cant do it because of this!"


I guess voting isn't really a priority for those people. So boo fricking hoo. If voting is soooo damn important, then freaking take the time to do it.
Posted by ArcticTiger
North Pole
Member since Nov 2018
2882 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:13 pm to
Dont be so sure about that. I have worked for years in Alaska. A lot of these places have no roads out of and the only way to get there is buy Plane so the Price can go up pretty damn quick $$$!
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29867 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:14 pm to
Complete and utter BS.

She was against it MONTHS AGO when there would have been plenty of time for legal voters to get their stuff together.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
10628 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

How are these people voting anyway?


She forgot to mention because Alaska has many remote villages, the state also appoints deputy registrars in rural communities so residents do not have to travel long distances to register.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29867 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

As it stands now, I’ve always shown ID when voting in person in La....Everything seems to be in order
and fraud seems very unlikely.


Ya think that's a coincidence?

You show your ID. Prove you are the person LEGALLY registered to vote. Fraud seems unlikely.

NO frickING shite!!!!!

Now do CA where no such safeguards exist.
Posted by honeybadger07
The Woodlands
Member since Jul 2015
4398 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:33 pm to
Carve out special circumstances for Alaska given its geographical hurdles.

Easy fix, but they don’t want it to happen.
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2557 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:48 pm to
All those issues can be fixed with a relatively small amount of money.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103546 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:24 pm to
Her points make sense as far as Alaska goes but instead of killing the entire bill and hurting Americas future due to inconvenience of a few thousand people at best couldn’t we amend the bill to exempt Alaska or attack federal funds that go toward state election officials flying out to remote areas to register these people once a year and/or collect ballots?

Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15575 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Her points make sense as far as Alaska goes but instead of killing the entire bill and hurting Americas future due to inconvenience of a few thousand people at best couldn’t we amend the bill to exempt Alaska or attack federal funds that go toward state election officials flying out to remote areas to register these people once a year and/or collect ballots?



Back in the past this would be quite reasonable to expect from Congress (thats typically how Alaska got things done at the Congressional level), nowadays politics and such arent common sense, nor is it reasonable.

This is why Congress has dismal approval rates...but each damn time it comes up for election, the general populace elects the same frickers all over again. And then when newcomers do come in? Sucked into the machine almost immediately for a majority of them that have any luck at getting re-elected (if they didnt bend knee to the political machines behind the scenes)
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Rainier Fog
Member since Jul 2025
1583 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

She makes a good point about getting ballots out in time this year. I deal with quite a few Circuit Clerks and it's pretty much too late to change ballots for November elections.


The election just slipped up on everyone
Posted by wookalar1013
up ta camp
Member since Jun 2017
2501 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:41 pm to
Doesn’t Donald Trump vote by mail? Good enough for him, good enough for Quinn the Eskimo
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58631 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:52 pm to
That's my question
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11278 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 2:55 pm to
These same arguments could be used in response to requiring drivers licenses to drive a vehicle, to deposit cash at a bank, to board an airplane. It’s a retarded straw man. Murk has benefited from loose election security in her prior elections to maintain power. That’s all this is about.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram