- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

#MuhInsurrection 2.0 - Lawmakers Plan for Possible 'Mass Casualty Event'
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:33 pm
quote:
Imagine the unthinkable: a mass shooting of members of Congress that leaves a large swath of the country unrepresented and shifts the balance of political power in Washington.
In the current political environment, such an outbreak of violence is not as unthinkable as it used to be, according to a bipartisan collection of House members. The attempted assassination of members at a congressional baseball team practice in 2017, the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, a dramatic spike in threats against members and, most recently, a possible second assassination attempt against former president Donald Trump highlight the need for Congress to ensure it can continue to govern in the aftermath of mass violence, they said.
To address such a scenario, these four House members — two Republicans and two Democrats — are pushing an unlikely solution: a constitutional amendment that would allow members to be replaced quickly in the event of a mass-casualty event.
In addition to ensuring uninterrupted representation for constituents, the amendment would discourage attempts to use violence to sway the balance of power in the House.
“We’ve seen a 300 percent increase in threats against members over the last seven years, according to the Capitol Police,” said Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.), one of four lawmakers pushing the issue. “In an environment where we have seen a growing tendency toward political violence, imagine — horrifically — a baseball practice where someone has bad intentions and better aim. You can literally flip a majority for three to four months. Which I think is a frightening incentive for political violence.”
According to a survey of state election officials, states need between three and four months, on average, to hold a special election to replace a deceased House member — a function of the time it takes to print ballots in addition to a federal law requiring ballots to be mailed to overseas and military voters at least 45 days ahead of an election.
Watch them set the narrative for more astroturfed violence surrounding the US Capitol when it comes time to certify Trump's Electoral College win.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:34 pm to VoxDawg
Like when that guy shot some Republican Congressmen playing baseball?
Or when 2 guys tried to kill Trump?
Or when 2 guys tried to kill Trump?
This post was edited on 9/23/24 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:34 pm to VoxDawg
Our government would probably run smoother and more efficient than ever before.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:34 pm to Cosmo
Chris Wray said they couldn't determine a motive for that.

Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:35 pm to VoxDawg
They haven't anything to worry about if everything is on the up and up.
Isn't that what they tell us when they spy on our cell phones?
Isn't that what they tell us when they spy on our cell phones?
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:37 pm to VoxDawg
Imagine the most heavily armed population on the planet going to DC to overthrow our government, and choosing to just leave those weapons back at the house.
How forgetful.
How forgetful.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:39 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Congress to ensure it can continue to govern in the aftermath of mass violence
They are doing a terrible job without mass violence.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:44 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021
This gives it away. There was no violent attack on the capital. Zero elected officials were in danger. IF it had been a violent insurrection, it would have succeeded because Trumps offer to employ the National Guard was rejected.
No thanks Mr. DC, go find some other ideas to actually help this nation and not attempt to enlarge the federal governments efforts to take our freedoms.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:46 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
This gives it away.
They will always tip their hand. You just have to know what their 'tell' is.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 3:47 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
possible second assassination attempt
Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:00 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
There was no violent attack on the capital. Zero elected officials were in danger. IF it had been a violent insurrection, it would have succeeded because Trumps offer to employ the National Guard was rejected
This. Pelosi knew that if the national guard got involved it meant that the military would be involved and there was a chance for the representatives in the house to question the legitimacy of the election. This would have given Trump the White House because Republicans held the majority of the states. Giving Trump the win. She knew this and wouldn’t allow it. It wasn’t about optics, that was the excuse used to camouflage the truth. It was about not allowing the constitution to work in Trumps favor.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:01 pm to VoxDawg
The only people shooting guns in any of the mentioned events were Leftists.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:04 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
The only people shooting guns in any of the mentioned events were Leftists.

Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:26 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021
There wouldn't have been any violence had capitol police not shot an unarmed woman.
quote:
a constitutional amendment that would allow members to be replaced quickly in the event of a mass-casualty event.
I know I'm cynical but this sounds awfully trojan horse-ish to me.
This post was edited on 9/24/24 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:28 pm to tgerb8
Remember, the Patriot Act was already written, prior to 9/11, 2001.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 4:35 pm to VoxDawg
All they're doing is telling people to start planning. Congress is openly hostile to the People.
Posted on 9/23/24 at 5:00 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
a constitutional amendment that would allow members to be replaced quickly in the event of a mass-casualty event.
So, democrats and their hit squads will exterminate republicans and then graciously appoint dems to fill the seats?????
That sounds like them.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 8:53 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
Imagine the most heavily armed population on the planet going to DC to overthrow our government, and choosing to just leave those weapons back at the house.
How forgetful.
Yep. If we wanted an "insurrection", we would've had one.
Remember - it wasn't until Trump posted the video ordering those responsible for the events at the Capitol on Jan 6 to go home in peace that the DS lost its collective mind, deplatformed the sitting POTUS and went full Orwell.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 9:15 am to VoxDawg
quote:
To address such a scenario, these four House members — two Republicans and two Democrats — are pushing an unlikely solution: a constitutional amendment that would allow members to be replaced quickly in the event of a mass-casualty event.
quote:
In addition to ensuring uninterrupted representation for constituents, the amendment would discourage attempts to use violence to sway the balance of power in the House.
Can we read the new Bill Liz Cheney placed regarding J6?
Popular
Back to top


28









