- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MSNBC: Democrats want Pardons for Jack Smith and his team
Posted on 12/2/24 at 1:15 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 12/2/24 at 1:15 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
when you know full well that your intention is to convey the narrative the J6 was an insurrection. When someone rightfully points this out, you start stamping your feet and accuse people of lying.
Posted on 12/2/24 at 2:01 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
You post the exact same pictures the left uses to peddle their insurrection narrative then crouch it in “who me? I’m just posting pictures of violence”,
I'm specifically doing that and only that.
You're using Voxdawg levels of "connecting dots" to interpret a stupid outcome, and then planting the flag.
quote:
when you know full well that your intention is to convey the narrative the J6 was an insurrection.
Your mind reading is as bad as your rhetorical honesty.
quote:
When someone rightfully points this out, you start stamping your feet and accuse people of lying.
Because they're lying.
I have specifically stated no insurrection occurred from January 6 onward with no diversion. I have openly corrected the few leftists on this board who I have seen parrot the meme (like BamaAtl).
Posted on 12/2/24 at 3:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Claims he isn't a democrat.
Voted for Obama twice. Says crime is down in the US. Claims there was no weaponization of the law against Trump.
Claims he only tells the truth.

This post was edited on 12/2/24 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 12/2/24 at 3:15 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
Claims he isn't a democrat.
I'm not a Democrat
quote:
Voted for Obama twice.
Excuse me, what the frick?
quote:
Says crime is down in the US.
Violent crime is down from the post-Covid peak, yes.
quote:
Claims there was no weaponization of the law against Trump.
I never said this, specifically.
quote:
Claims he only tells the truth.
The irony of someone who lied about me twice in this post melting over my adherence to the truth is...something.
Posted on 12/2/24 at 6:59 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
My boy Occam says just prove the 2020 election was 100% fraudulent and an illegitimate puppet was installed in the office of POTUS + the entire government. SCOTUS rules that the 46 error was null and void, and you indict till your heart is content.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 12/2/24 at 7:32 pm to John Barron
Would the Dems really want this? If what is being said is true then they could be questioned without the 5th amendment protection. Would the Democratic Party really want the skeletons cleared out of their closet? Currently they could conceivably admit defeat, admit their faults, and attempt to rebuild and move forward. If it was ever brought to light the depth of their corruption it would basically destroy the party and would take decades if ever to recover. A new party may be forced to form. It’s hard to think they’d do this just for a blip(Trump) in time. I mean seriously McCarthyism went away and we recovered just fine.
Posted on 12/2/24 at 8:44 pm to ninthward
quote:
He was not legally appointed.
You notice he didn’t respond to this?
Posted on 12/2/24 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're using Voxdawg levels of "connecting dots"
You average, what, 50 plus posts per day? No one has to connect dots to know the message you’re conveying. Your narcissism and inability to STFU makes it rather easy to ascertain the narratives you’re attempting to peddle.
Posted on 12/2/24 at 9:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An idiotic talking point would be “I’m not even sure the word lawfare actually exists”
quote:I typically stay out of SFP bashing, but in this instance, SFP, as written, the first quote may be a paraphrase of what you have said, but you have said some reasonable iteration of this in other posts, so it is disingenuous to deny it.
that's not what I have said on the matter, and anything associated with that line of commentary is directly related with the matter of defining the concept, which is the primary goal. If you can't properly give a universal, specific operative definition, then it's nothing more than a moving target you change to fit whatever situation you're discussing.
That is the height of dishonest rhetoric and logical fallacy.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:45 am to John Barron
Is treason a pardonable offense?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:55 am to John Barron
Just keep investigating until you find something before or after the limits of the pardon. Can't pardon for future crimes.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 12:56 am
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:51 am to LCA131
quote:
have not read all of the responses in all of the various pardon threads, but the ONLY reason THIS pardon happened was because that pesky judge sniffed out the deal Hunter was getting in his court case. He was getting a full pardon then outside of the small fine for the gun and tax stuff
This. You won't find any of our board aktuallys who can't seem to find their voice on lawfare remembering any of this out loud
Posted on 12/3/24 at 5:13 am to Shamoan
quote:
Is treason a pardonable offense?
Yes. The president's pardon authority is relatively absolute.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 6:44 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You notice he didn’t respond to this?
I didn't see it
Only one Court of Appeal has ruled on the issue, and they confirmed the process. The court considered the 2nd more authoritative and influential behind only the USSC.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 6:48 am to John Barron
I will say it like our board liberals who love lawfare. If you didn’t do anything wrong you have nothing to be afraid of, lol.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 8:11 am to John Barron
This thread is 7 pages deep, so perhaps this has already been said.
The left is calling for these blanket pardons and claiming "political prosecution" before Trump is even in office so that they can claim that any and all charges are purely political.
The left has invested 8+ years into prosecuting Trump at the federal, state and local level. All of those efforts have failed and now he is headed back to the White House and gets his own DOJ. They fear retribution and rightfully so.
And why should the Orange One be magnanimous? The left offered no such quarter.
The left is calling for these blanket pardons and claiming "political prosecution" before Trump is even in office so that they can claim that any and all charges are purely political.
The left has invested 8+ years into prosecuting Trump at the federal, state and local level. All of those efforts have failed and now he is headed back to the White House and gets his own DOJ. They fear retribution and rightfully so.
And why should the Orange One be magnanimous? The left offered no such quarter.
Popular
Back to top

0












