Started By
Message

re: More Small Government Conservatism in Louisiana Legislature

Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61385 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

LA R.S. 14:106


Why wouldn’t obscene pictures already be covered by this statute?
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39265 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:52 pm to
GFY, groomer. Leave the kids alone.
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7155 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

quote:
If none of them do then this law shouldn't result in any sandy vajayjays.


Just more useless legislation and a waste of time.


This is government we are talking about, never proactive. This legislation wouldn't be proposed in any other fashion than a reactive sort of response to something that has already occurred.
Again though, I don't think this needs to be a law. If there are some schools where this is an issue with inappropriate material for elementary grade students, then the government needs to just do it's job and replace the people in charge of placing books in libraries. Who are these people and what is their current policy/practice for deciding which books to place in the library? It seems like this sort of thing would be subject to review, is it not? If it's not, maybe that would be needed legislation since some places clearly can't manage a simple task of having a respectable library.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70466 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:55 pm to
True, but at the same time, it’s a reasonable expectation by parents that the child spaces THE PARENTS ARE PAYING FOR aren’t PAYING TO PROVIDE THE MATERIAL to the students WITHOUT THEIR PARENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT!

So, we’ve gone from “you’re a crazy conspiracy theorist if you think this is happening” to “yeah, but it’s rare and no big deal”, to “yeah, it’s happening and here’s why it’s a good thing…”

NO! Just F$&K NO! It shouldn’t happen EVER! If schools can get sued into oblivion for nebulously paying for a Christian based anything happening on their campus once, why should we tolerate schools purchasing porn to make available to students? It’s not, and only morons who actively want to sexualize children would think it is appropriate.

There is zero chance anything but a small minority of parents would support such a practice, so allowing it to happen is nothing more than stealing taxpayer dollars to purposely subvert the will of those taxpayers.
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 1:57 pm
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24227 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:56 pm to
If you posted pics from some of these “children’s” books in this thread you would be banned.

It’s hilarious that some parents have brought the books to school board meetings and read aloud. They have had their mic cut off while reading.

Fox link example
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70466 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:57 pm to
Because they currently are exempted as part of the exemption for libraries, the same exemption this law is attempting to remove.

This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 1:59 pm
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
7514 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23920 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:14 pm to
Calm down. You can still read your groomer books to your sperm donor’s kids, you’ll just have to buy them instead
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 2:16 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55545 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

It is the practice that one group thinks their moral beliefs trump other people's moral beliefs, when it comes to government entities such as schools and libraries.

The same could be said of public nudity laws. All societies have mores that are enforced by laws. In this case, no one is banning books, they are censoring which books you can expose to students. That is NOT book banning.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70466 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:41 pm to
There a big difference between “I’m not going to buy you this for free” and “you’re not allowed to buyor possess this”. There’s also a big difference between “you can’t read this” and “this isn’t appropriate for children”.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11229 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:55 pm to
We could be banned from this adult centric site if we post illustrations found in these books.
Posted by daydranking
nunya
Member since Sep 2019
488 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:59 pm to
are you implying that you are a-okay with pornographical content in public libraries?
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6653 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Call it whatever you want, it is book banning.
--very dramatic.

Where are they burning the books?

Also, you can't go and buy these books at a store?
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17467 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Call it whatever you want, it is book banning.


Can we get your quotes on the banning of Huckleberry Finn, To Kill a Mockingbird, Of Mice and Men, Dr Seuss??

You know… ACTUAL literary classics and not books teaching elementary school kids about sex acts and encouraging them to question their gender?

Your concern is noted, extremely late, obviously misplaced, and set aside.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41057 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

That babbling idiot came here hoping to get his little badge of honor bashing our current governor


This has absolutely nothing to do with Landry at thus point in time.

Weird melt
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41057 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

nd what if a parent doesn't feel that sexual topics are appropriate for their 2nd or 3rd grader to be exposed to at that age?


Age appropriate conversations are appropriate

But understand kids are talking about stuff younger and younger these days
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41057 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Defeating the LGBTQIA agenda. Winning.


Our state sucks in ever measurable category except hating the gays.

Winning lol
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41057 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Go take some pictures of the illustrations in your groomer books and post them here. I bet you get banned for porn


What’s a groomer book?

You have a weird obsession with me.

I’m sorry but I’m not gay. You will have to find someone else.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157790 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:38 pm to
Are you in Houston?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41057 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

In this case, no one is banning books, they are censoring which books you can expose to students. That is NOT book banning.


A censored book is a banned book.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram