
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Miller: "There's a CRISIS in the courts, and the Supreme Court better get WISE to it"
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:09 am
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:09 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Stephen Miller just UNLEASHED on the judicial coup, saying the Supreme Court must step in IMMEDIATELY
"There's a CRISIS in the courts, and the Supreme Court better get WISE to it, because they are ALLOWING these rogue district courts and these rogue circuit panels to undermine respect and the integrity of our judiciary!"
"And the Supreme Court has to STEP IN and make the courts act within the bounds of the law to have a sound future for Article 3."
"SHAME ON THESE JUDGES!"
"The idea that you can have a private citizen in a fake group who says that they walk their dog near the White House, so they are standing to SUE the President of the United States over a national security facility in the White House complex?!"
"It's such an INSULT to the legal profession, to our judicial system!"
"For the judiciary to go along with this is a BLIGHT on Article 3!"
"This is a national security facility to keep the President safe, to keep his family safe, to keep senior officials safe, visiting dignitary safe."
"We just had the attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, and we're actually having this conversation, shame on these judges!"
"Let's get real in this country. Let's have a court system that actually upholds the laws rather than making them."
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All for the BAALroom
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
He’s right but as usual…
Nothing will happen until it’s too late and it may be too late.
The happening will be ugly and protracted.
Nothing will happen until it’s too late and it may be too late.
The happening will be ugly and protracted.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:51 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It might as well get built now that the East Wing is demolished.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:52 am to 4quartaBamaball
If you want to understand WHY the security of the ballroom is so important, with the state-of-the-art electronic security measures and hardening of the building, go watch Episode 1 of Season 3 of the show, Lioness, starring Zoe Saldana, as Taylor Sheridan has shown the world in this episode what a drone swarm in the battlefields of Ukraine can do, which is to be operated by AI and cause massive panic and damage. All it would take is one or two semi trucks with open roofs to unleash hundreds of bomb carrying drones that can reach the Whitehouse in just a few minutes as First-Person View (FPV) Strike Drones, the type being used there, can race toward targets at speeds exceeding 120 mph, making them exceptionally difficult to outrun or dodge on the battlefield and in a swarm that launches from Interstate 395, just south of the Whitehouse and only 1.3 miles away, a swarm could be there in as little as 40 seconds.
There are technologies being used against them, but honestly, with the current setup being a huge tent on the lawn, do we really want to count on technologies to get all the drones in those few seconds?
People out there are fricking stupid, like you.
There are technologies being used against them, but honestly, with the current setup being a huge tent on the lawn, do we really want to count on technologies to get all the drones in those few seconds?
People out there are fricking stupid, like you.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:54 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Asking honestly here, and it's strange I don't know this with a history poli-sci background, what exactly can the supreme Court do when a district judge makes an absurd ruling? I get it - they can overturn the ruling itself but do they have some sort of enforcement authority to remove a district judge from the bench?
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:55 am to HubbaBubba
need some discussion about how a private citizen walking by has standing to sue in a national security determination. SFP would have an answer.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:56 am to HubbaBubba
Would a President AOC order it demolished just to get Trump?
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The only splice I take in this BS is that someday it may allow the killing of a future D president and it will be on the left’s hands.
This thing won’t even be done for Trump to really get any use out of it. He’s doing it for the future president and they’re screwing it up just because of their TDS.
This thing won’t even be done for Trump to really get any use out of it. He’s doing it for the future president and they’re screwing it up just because of their TDS.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:02 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Miller is straight fire.
I would vote for him as president.
I would vote for him as president.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:14 am to TrueTiger
Do you think Tom Brady will run?
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:29 am to ClientNumber9
quote:
Asking honestly here, and it's strange I don't know this with a history poli-sci background, what exactly can the supreme Court do when a district judge makes an absurd ruling? I get it - they can overturn the ruling itself but do they have some sort of enforcement authority to remove a district judge from the bench?
No, and most say nothing can be done other than congress removing a judge which wont happen. So I guess we wait til a judge rules he doesnt like cars and we all sit at home til it gets to the supreme court........
or we take the same drastic measures and have federal marshals arrest the judge for purposely endangering the POTUS, and let him cool his heels in open population of a prison......until the supreme court rules

Popular
Back to top

6










