Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Miller: "There's a CRISIS in the courts, and the Supreme Court better get WISE to it"

Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:09 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39988 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:09 am



quote:

Stephen Miller just UNLEASHED on the judicial coup, saying the Supreme Court must step in IMMEDIATELY

"There's a CRISIS in the courts, and the Supreme Court better get WISE to it, because they are ALLOWING these rogue district courts and these rogue circuit panels to undermine respect and the integrity of our judiciary!"

"And the Supreme Court has to STEP IN and make the courts act within the bounds of the law to have a sound future for Article 3."

"SHAME ON THESE JUDGES!"

"The idea that you can have a private citizen in a fake group who says that they walk their dog near the White House, so they are standing to SUE the President of the United States over a national security facility in the White House complex?!"

"It's such an INSULT to the legal profession, to our judicial system!"

"For the judiciary to go along with this is a BLIGHT on Article 3!"

"This is a national security facility to keep the President safe, to keep his family safe, to keep senior officials safe, visiting dignitary safe."

"We just had the attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, and we're actually having this conversation, shame on these judges!"

"Let's get real in this country. Let's have a court system that actually upholds the laws rather than making them."
Posted by 4quartaBamaball
Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Nov 2015
2161 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:23 am to
All for the BAALroom
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s hollow dome
Member since Feb 2009
160438 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:23 am to
He’s right but as usual…

Nothing will happen until it’s too late and it may be too late.

The happening will be ugly and protracted.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38972 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:51 am to
It might as well get built now that the East Wing is demolished.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
53003 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:52 am to
If you want to understand WHY the security of the ballroom is so important, with the state-of-the-art electronic security measures and hardening of the building, go watch Episode 1 of Season 3 of the show, Lioness, starring Zoe Saldana, as Taylor Sheridan has shown the world in this episode what a drone swarm in the battlefields of Ukraine can do, which is to be operated by AI and cause massive panic and damage. All it would take is one or two semi trucks with open roofs to unleash hundreds of bomb carrying drones that can reach the Whitehouse in just a few minutes as First-Person View (FPV) Strike Drones, the type being used there, can race toward targets at speeds exceeding 120 mph, making them exceptionally difficult to outrun or dodge on the battlefield and in a swarm that launches from Interstate 395, just south of the Whitehouse and only 1.3 miles away, a swarm could be there in as little as 40 seconds.

There are technologies being used against them, but honestly, with the current setup being a huge tent on the lawn, do we really want to count on technologies to get all the drones in those few seconds?

People out there are fricking stupid, like you.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10242 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:54 am to
Asking honestly here, and it's strange I don't know this with a history poli-sci background, what exactly can the supreme Court do when a district judge makes an absurd ruling? I get it - they can overturn the ruling itself but do they have some sort of enforcement authority to remove a district judge from the bench?
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11676 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:55 am to
need some discussion about how a private citizen walking by has standing to sue in a national security determination. SFP would have an answer.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
172508 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:56 am to
Would a President AOC order it demolished just to get Trump?
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
25396 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:57 am to
The only splice I take in this BS is that someday it may allow the killing of a future D president and it will be on the left’s hands.

This thing won’t even be done for Trump to really get any use out of it. He’s doing it for the future president and they’re screwing it up just because of their TDS.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84303 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:02 am to
Miller is straight fire.

I would vote for him as president.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
172508 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:06 am to
Miller/Gabbard 2028
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
172508 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:14 am to
Do you think Tom Brady will run?
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21333 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Asking honestly here, and it's strange I don't know this with a history poli-sci background, what exactly can the supreme Court do when a district judge makes an absurd ruling? I get it - they can overturn the ruling itself but do they have some sort of enforcement authority to remove a district judge from the bench?


No, and most say nothing can be done other than congress removing a judge which wont happen. So I guess we wait til a judge rules he doesnt like cars and we all sit at home til it gets to the supreme court........

or we take the same drastic measures and have federal marshals arrest the judge for purposely endangering the POTUS, and let him cool his heels in open population of a prison......until the supreme court rules
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram