- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:05 pm to lepdagod
quote:
Trying to sound smart…
frick off. The guy you're talking to agreed with me just the other day when I posted photos of the attack angle on this missile. He said that he believed we have glide bombs that match that attack angle.
The missile came at the school at a 70° angle. Tomahawks hit from a 15-20° angle.
quote:
the only thing we knew for sure the day of was that it was a tomahawk…
And this isn't frickin true. This is what you've read online and it confirms your bias.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:05 pm to ChatGPT of LA
I would bet and I am sure someone on here knows but every tomahawk fired would be accounted for and some type of damage assessment known? You would think the militay would know in realtive short order if they erroneously targeted that location or there was some type of malfunction.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:08 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Because Tomahawk missiles are designed to fly at very low altitudes to avoid enemy radar. They usually hit their target from relatively low angles due to this. Supposedly they have a maximum of 70 degrees attack angle. From the video that everyone seems to believe is the video of the school bombing (which has never been confirmed or proven is authentic) the missile hits the target at a very steep angle, so most likely from a high altitude, unlike a Tomahawk.
I don’t even have to google to know with a high degree of certainty that the tomahawk has multiple terminal attack profiles that can be selected. And I never said it was a tomahawk. We have a multitude of weapons systems that have little wings on them and they also have multiple terminal attack profiles.
Maybe it was an Iranian missile that went up and came straight down on the school at the same time we happen to be bombing the naval base. And let’s not forget that the school used to be part of the naval base.
Or, we had bad intel and struck the school thinking it was still part of the base…at the same time we hit the rest of the base.
One of these statistically much more likely than the other.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:12 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
And I never said it was a tomahawk.
That's because you frickin know it wasn't.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:13 pm to AlterEd
quote:
That's because you frickin know it wasn't.
I don’t know for certain. But I am capable of logic and common sense, which you are clearly not.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:14 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
But I am capable of logic and common sense, which you are clearly not.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:16 pm to msutiger
Whether we did it or not, the biggest issue is the number of people, many supposedly conservatives, who want so badly for it to be our fault just so they can have another talking point against the military action.
Like that guy said the other day, he's never seen so many Americans who are actively rooting for things to go wrong over there.
It's ok to be against it, but you people are openly hoping for failure just so you can say you were right. It's pathetic and un-American.
Like that guy said the other day, he's never seen so many Americans who are actively rooting for things to go wrong over there.
It's ok to be against it, but you people are openly hoping for failure just so you can say you were right. It's pathetic and un-American.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:23 pm to Boodis Man
quote:hyperbole much?
LOL, this is an all timer when it comes to incompetence. but you know many on this board will still give him a pass and continue to suck him off no matter what he does
Trump used tomahawk and cruise missile interchangeably, which we know is incorrect, but not some all time blunder like you are insisting it is.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:25 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:Well logic and common sense should tell you that it could be either of the three combatants who were responsible for the bombing. Not just us.
But I am capable of logic and common sense,
1. Iranian missile that either malfunctioned or was jammed and hit the school.
2. An American Tomahawk that accidentally targeted the school because of bad or outdated intel.
3. Israeli missile for the same reason as #2.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:25 pm to msutiger
War is hell.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:26 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Well logic and common sense should tell you that it could be either of the three combatants who were responsible for the bombing. Not just us. 1. Iranian missile that either malfunctioned or was jammed and hit the school. 2. An American Tomahawk that accidentally targeted the school because of bad or outdated intel. 3. Israeli missile for the same reason as #2.
I’ve said this exact same thing all along. And the most likely of which is number 2. It makes the most sense.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:27 pm to The Baker
quote:
It was the first morning of the bombing.
quote:
What country doesn't do this?
Both points fail. Tensions have been building for weeks. Kids should have been kept home. Truth is, Iran wanted dead civilians, just like the left wanted dead protesters in somaliapolis. You people are pure fricking evil.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:29 pm to td01241
quote:
Yes. This will be on huge blast 24/7 for the next week at least
Live shot of our resident /pol/ tards SFP, VOR, and Powerman
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:29 pm to msutiger
I don’t what if this is true but mistakes do happen. I have friends in the Predator kill chain and they have mentioned a few incidents where we killed non-combatants. What we don’t know is if there were military targets below the school.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:33 pm to msutiger
Zero cred to the NY Times, especially given AI. They have 'cried wolf' in so many instances that they are now irrelevant re changing anybody's mind via their 'reporting'/'investigations'. They are a Leftist propaganda mouthpiece. 
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:34 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
BBC and NYT have video analysis indicating a tomahawk was used. NBC has images
so since you believe "Trump lied to our faces again" give us a magnitude of this lie.
Let's use a spectrum:
"Mexico is going to pay for the wall" on one end
"the border is closed and secure" on the other.
How serious of a "lie" relative to the safety and security of the citizenry was this in your mind??
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:35 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:No it doesn’t.
And the most likely of which is number 2. It makes the most sense.
All 3 scenarios are equally plausible.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:37 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
Bull. shite.
It was an absolute fricking blunder.
Now, carry on Mr President Fellatio
It was an absolute fricking blunder.
Now, carry on Mr President Fellatio
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:39 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
No it doesn’t. All 3 scenarios are equally plausible.
Not even close.
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News