- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:20 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
Of course the democrats would care more about Iranian kids than the American kids getting killed and kidnapped/raped by illegals
You came off the top rope
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:20 pm to msutiger
Source? My neighbor's dog and unknown someone's are not a source.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:21 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
Boodis Man
You're an idiot.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:35 pm to msutiger
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:38 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
I don't have to prove shite
Which is a good thing for you, since all you have ever proven is that you're a TDS-obsessed clown.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:41 pm to grif82
quote:
Newflash. War sucks. shite like this happens.
Y’all are so fricking brave when the bombs are exploding on schools a world away.
Will it be “well, that’s war” when an Iranian detonates a bomb in your hometown school?
Oh no, that would be “terrorism”.
Y’all can use whatever words you want. War is sometimes justified and terrible things may result that will be the natural consequence of just war. Trump has not made the case that this war is just.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:45 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
Will it be “well, that’s war” when an Iranian detonates a bomb in your hometown school? Oh no, that would be “terrorism”.
If they intentionally target a school for the purposes of instilling fear and political unrest it would be terrorism.
If they are attempting to target one of military facilities and accidentally hit a school that would be war.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:47 pm to KCT
The evidence points to a tomahawk. The school building is adjacent to military buildings that were destroyed. Wall was just added within the last 10 years.
Could’ve been a mistake because old maps were used.
Why do you want to act as if it wasn’t a Tomahawk?
Could’ve been a mistake because old maps were used.
Why do you want to act as if it wasn’t a Tomahawk?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:49 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I agree. Which is why I will continue to tell people that is not a tomahawk missile. The attack profile is wrong. That is not the way tomahawks fly through the air. And there is at least one prior service in this thread who knows this but still pretends that it was our fault anyways.
Well I served… in my opinion it was a tomahawk because we admitted that much from day one
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:51 pm to lepdagod
I don’t know why keeps saying the attack profile is wrong for a tomahawk.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:54 pm to Boodis Man
quote:Just playing defense attorney here.
NBC has images showing fragments bearing the markings of tomahawks.
Fragments of a Tomahawk? How many Tomahawk missiles have been fired into Iran since the campaign began? Probably a couple hundred?
Is it possible that the radical Islamic regime retrieved Tomahawk fragments/parts from another bombing location and presented them as “evidence” of the bombing of the school?
Is that at all possible or plausible? Yes? Well then shite the frick up.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:55 pm to msutiger
Tough shite. Don’t put a school on a military base. Also, don’t hold school while your country is being bombed. This is a classic example of “human shields”. Blame belongs on the moslem cocksuckers, not the USA.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:57 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Don’t put a school on a military base.
What country doesn't do this?
quote:
Also, don’t hold school while your country is being bombed.
It was the first morning of the bombing.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:58 pm to msutiger
quote:
The New York Times claims the the DOW has reached a verdict that the USA did strike the Iranian School with a Tomahawk.
Odd. Members of the press have quit working out of the Pentagon for refusing to agree to no leaking and seeking pentagon/military staff for such reasons.
Further, the Pentagon has gone after members of the military for leaking accurate and false information to the press.
Kinda makes you wonder... How many times have we seen false statements from anonymous sources "familiar with the matter"?
The Whitehouse stated yesterday, the investigation is not complete, and they won't be bullied by the NYT to release the report before it is complete.
Then today, the NYT comes out with this... I wonder why.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Anyone believing anything from anonymous sources or sources familiar with the matter in the Year Of Our Lord 2026 is retarded
quote:
msutiger
Also quit being a lazy sack of shite and post something from the article and stop posting blind links
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:58 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
I don’t know why keeps saying the attack profile is wrong for a tomahawk.
Trying to sound smart… the only thing we knew for sure the day of was that it was a tomahawk… that and that Iran doesn’t possess them… Trump being oblivious to anything military related expected because of the bone spurs… but how can his advisors allow him to be so misinformed
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:59 pm to msutiger
Yes, we were responsible. No, it wasn’t one of our missiles. It was launched within the city. We jammed it causing it to hit the school.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:00 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Don’t put a school on a military base.
Have you ever been to a military base??
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:01 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:Because Tomahawk missiles are designed to fly at very low altitudes to avoid enemy radar. They usually hit their target from relatively low angles due to this. Supposedly they have a maximum of 70 degrees attack angle.
I don’t know why keeps saying the attack profile is wrong for a tomahawk.
From the video that everyone seems to believe is the video of the school bombing (which has never been confirmed or proven is authentic) the missile hits the target at a very steep angle, so most likely from a high altitude, unlike a Tomahawk.
Popular
Back to top


0





