- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:23 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I’m glad we are focused on important matters
Let me guess: “What difference at this point does it make?”
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:24 pm to BeeFense5
How wasnt that an important matter?
Clown
Clown
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:28 pm to SDVTiger
The stupid fricker is trying to equate prosecutors coercing testimony and hanging 34 fraudulent felonies on a candidate for the White House to the POTUS pushing the DoJ to charge a guy for vandalism when multiple witnesses testify to that guy committing vandalism.
That user is an actual communist.
That user is an actual communist.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I’m glad we are focused on important matters
We're gonna stick your unAmerican heroes in prison, where they belong.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:46 pm to BoarEd
So we don't believe Michael Cohen when se says bad things about Trump but we do believe him when he says good things? Make it make sense.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:15 pm to ronricks
quote:
So we don't believe Michael Cohen when se says bad things about Trump but we do believe him when he says good things? Make it make sense.
Despite gator calling you astute…you’re not. You’re quite slow. It is clear that Cohen is not reliable. Yet the state relied greatly upon his testimony. It’s the states burden to provided proof beyond a reasonable doubt. They relied upon someone that is clearly not reliable for that proof. That makes sense to anyone with a triple digit IQ. Clearly you’re not part of that group.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:16 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I’m glad we are focused on important matters
Trump is a multi, multi tasker. Unlike ordinary people like you.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:19 pm to BoarEd
Trump was on his podcast not long ago and that blew my mind...
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
IF the legal grounds for Cohen "recanting" existed, don't you think Trump's DOJ would have pounced on the New York prosecutorial scum as soon as Cohen's words became public?
Under which authority would Trump’s DOJ jump on a state court’s proceedings?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
In the spirit of that, what leverage do you think the State of New York had over Cohen to suborn perjury?
Any number of things. It’s not hard to think of a way a state prosecutor could threaten a witness. Especially when that state prosecutor ran on “getting Trump.”
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:48 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
glad we are focused on important matters
Dude what the frick would you refer to as an important matter if not this? I mean you might hate Trump but it's pretty fricking important if a local district attorney abuses their power to try to go after a president with extremely flimsy charges and coerced testimony. No I'm not sitting here telling you that I know for sure that's what happened but it would be fricking important if it did
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:48 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
mad that his liner vandalism was a hoax
Your claim is so easily proven false. You have to try to be this ignorant.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:49 pm to BeeFense5
quote:so why exactly did you drop in on this thread and then run like a little bitch?
BeeFense5
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:49 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Yes because when I think of honest and stand up guy I look at Michael cohen.
But yet you believed him when he fueled your TDS every time you told random people Trump was guilty of 34 felonies.
The mental retardation label stands
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:50 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
This is the maga way. Can’t refute anything? Then lash out angrily
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:54 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
or intentionally disingenuous. No other option.
After being called out for minimizing the importance of malicious prosecution against a former POTUS the user's retort was essentially, "oh yeah, well you believe in Q!! Har har!"
That user is a communist trying to mount a defense for other communists who attempted to hijack our government.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:55 pm to BeeFense5
Was there a particular moment that you decided to become post constitutional or did it just kind of happen slowly?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 4:19 pm to BoarEd
He reeeeeeally wants a pardon for his felony conviction
Popular
Back to top


0




