Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Media in a frenzy about Dershowitz and Starr

Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:41 pm
Posted by ClampClampington
Nebraska
Member since Jun 2017
3967 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:41 pm
I’m confused, was Trump brought up on impeachment charges for sexual assault or matters relating to the Constitution? Meaning, wgaf who his lawyers have represented in the past, they both know the Constitution as well as anyone and that’s why they are part of Trumps counsel.

But no, left will just stamp their feet that Dershowitz has represented OJ and Epstein and Starr was tied to Baylor. Because they are lawyers and that is there job.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:46 pm to
Their opinion of Trump can't get any lower so they expect him to have a Jackie Chiles type lawyer.
Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
5857 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:46 pm to
They'll be in much more of a frenzy soon.

F the media.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99043 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:47 pm to
Jackie Chiles would work as long as Trump isn't a Kramer type client.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:48 pm to
Never Ending Story ended, so I sued.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112485 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:49 pm to
They also question the objectivity of presiding judge John Roberts. This is stupid because in impeachment the SC judge doesn't do anything. He can bring his smartphone and play games.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

He can bring his smartphone and play games.


Or put gold braids on his robe because he wanted them.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95664 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:51 pm to
The lawyer the media wished he had-



Lionel Hutz, aka Miguel Sanchez, aka Dr Nguyen Van Phuoc
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34102 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

This is stupid because in impeachment the SC judge doesn't do anything.

There's not a lot of Rhodes Scholar's working in the MSM. Mostly White, or Jewish, politically connected, rich kids.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

They also question the objectivity of presiding judge John Roberts. This is stupid because in impeachment the SC judge doesn't do anything. He can bring his smartphone and play games.





This is downright hilarious from my conspiratorial sided mind POV. I think Trump needs both Derschowitz and Roberts off the trial anyways, but because I don't believe Trump can trust either of them.

So it's strange that the media is throwing a stink about the same guys, but for different reasons.

It would be totally like Trump to pull the rug out from under them and say, "okay, you get your wish. I'm firing Derschowitz and filing a motion requesting Roberts to recuse himself for a conflict of interest (re, FISA court material)."

I think the media is tipping their hand here just like Schumer did yesterday with his ridiculous "members from both sides of the aisle visibly gulped when John Roberts walked into the room."

Do it, President Trump!! It would be epic!
This post was edited on 1/17/20 at 2:03 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112485 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

There's not a lot of Rhodes Scholar's working in the MSM. Mostly White, or Jewish, politically connected, rich kids.


Ah hell, I've been saying that journalists are the dumbest POS you'd ever want to meet. Print journalists make poverty wages. TV journalists make money because they look good, can cold read and emote 'concern.' You might think cold reading is easy but when you hear print journalists on radio every other word is 'uh, well, basically, ya know.' They sound like Obama off teleprompter.
Posted by Statsattack
Il
Member since Feb 2013
3897 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 2:02 pm to
dershowitz is the man. He is the one who got Clau Von Bulow off
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30116 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 2:04 pm to
Yeah their TDS is flaring up very badly today. They're under extreme stress and the cracks are showing.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39203 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 2:43 pm to
Adding Dershowitz and Starr is just bad optics for Trump. I'm sure they're good lawyers but they have a lot of baggage.
Posted by Gondor
Jacksonville, Fl
Member since Nov 2004
970 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 3:10 pm to
Jackie Chiles would tear that democratic case apart, even with Kramer as lead witness.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49343 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Adding Dershowitz and Starr is just bad optics for Trump. I'm sure they're good lawyers but they have a lot of baggage.



Who would you suggest?

Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30116 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 3:45 pm to
What isn't bad optics for Trump when it comes to certain kind of people?? Those people would try to insist eating a bowl of corn flakes in the morning is somehow, some way bad optics. That's what unhealthy obsession does to a person. Nobody listens to TDS sufferers, other than other TDS sufferers, of course.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63533 posts
Posted on 1/17/20 at 3:47 pm to
Haven’t seen anyone stamping their feet.
Who cares who Trump hires as counsel?
He goes through lawyers like Kleenex.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram