- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McCaskill to vote No on Kavanaugh nomination
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Landrieu was able to win elections in Louisiana despite being totally out of the mainstream in her state’s electorate because idiots would repeat the following talking point
“Mary Landriue sits atop important senate spots, which means she is able to bring lots of important pork and resources to Louisiana”
And her office was very good with constituent services especially when it came to the O&G industry. I voted against her at every opportunity I was given but the argument you cite is not entirely bullshite.
0
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She makes a sound argument. Can't really pick apart her argument. The only fault lies in that it is reason enough to vote no. It isn't.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:30 pm to Toddy
quote:
Well, you better start getting angry. Suburban college educated females hate Trump with a passion
Fortunately your evil, corrupt party has made an arse of themselves this week so hopefully enough of these women stay home.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:32 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Her argument could be iron-clad, but if her constituents want a conservative guy on SCOTUS, and she ran as a R in her state, then it doesn't matter what she thinks.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:33 pm to Ollieoxenfree99
She runs as a conservative Democrat.
She votes like Mao.
She votes like Mao.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:34 pm to Ollieoxenfree99
quote:
Her argument could be iron-clad, but if her constituents want a conservative guy on SCOTUS, and she ran as a R in her state, then it doesn't matter what she thinks.
Well, it's her vote, not her constituents. Vote your conscience and bear the costs. That's what a person with moral fiber would do.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:34 pm to Toddy
quote:
Suburban college educated females hate Trump with a passion
I'm married to a suburban college educated female.
She's a big Trump fan
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
A well stated reason for a no vote. This is democracy folks.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:38 pm to Tigerdev
Actually no.
There is only one reason to vote no: the person is unqualified. Their political opinion or how they would vote on particular matters are completely irrelevant.
There is only one reason to vote no: the person is unqualified. Their political opinion or how they would vote on particular matters are completely irrelevant.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:38 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
A well stated reason for a no vote. This is democracy folks.
It's a charade. I wonder how many other "litmus test" issues she has..... Hhhhhmmmm.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:40 pm to Fun Bunch
thats rich. Some people dont even get a hearing for strictly political reasons. And you are here crying over well reasoned disagreement with his legal positions?Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:43 pm to Tigerdev
Yes. Merrick Garland should be on the SpCrt. He was qualified for the position.
I would have voted for him. I would have voted for Gorsuch. And RBG.
I probably wouldn’t have voted for Kagan. Although I have come to respect her more as time as gone on. I would have voted for Sotamayor but regretted it in retrospect because she is an awful awful awful Justice.
See? I can be objective. You are incapable but I already knew that.
I would have voted for him. I would have voted for Gorsuch. And RBG.
I probably wouldn’t have voted for Kagan. Although I have come to respect her more as time as gone on. I would have voted for Sotamayor but regretted it in retrospect because she is an awful awful awful Justice.
See? I can be objective. You are incapable but I already knew that.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:45 pm to Tigerdev
Why doesn’t Ellison’s accuser get any air play or go fund me action?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:58 pm to Fun Bunch
Easy to say when the damage is already done. Pretty meaningless as well.
The constant escalation of partisanship leads us here and beyond. The Garland thing will never and can never be forgiven while the same general people are in office. If you cant see that you are blind and quite foolish.
The constant escalation of partisanship leads us here and beyond. The Garland thing will never and can never be forgiven while the same general people are in office. If you cant see that you are blind and quite foolish.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:00 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
You are mistaken on the job description.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:03 pm to Centinel
quote:
She's about as Republican as the WV dude is a democrat.
WV dude will vote to confirm.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 11:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She's twisting herself into a pretzel to find a justification to vote against him. This tells me that the Dims's own polling is showing the accusations aren't resonating with undecided voters.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 12:37 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
She is a filthy traitor kunt.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 12:45 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Terrible
Posted on 9/20/18 at 12:45 am to Toddy
quote:
Well, you better start getting angry. Suburban college educated females hate Trump with a passion
That is not true of all suburban college educated females!
Myself and 5 good friends all voted for Trump and continue to support his agenda. All of us have master’s degrees. (Education, Nursing, Law, Business & Accounting)
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News