Started By
Message

re: May have found a missile part near crash site

Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:45 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29514 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Come on Chiz. The tip of a SAM is the homing device. Warhead is the explosives and cutting or frag parts behind it.



I didn’t realize it but you’re right. I just looked up diagrams and the warhead would definitely sit behind there which explains why this is still in tact.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19168 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

The tip of a SAM is the homing device. Warhead is the explosives and cutting or frag parts behind it.



I’m not a missile expert, so I’ll leave that to others. My point that got lost I think was why were missile parts found among the wreckage? If was hit by one, the point at which it was impacted and the actual crash site are a good distance from each other. Would you expect to find it among the wreckage?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20573 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

However, if he had, that downed airliner would have been a massive blow politically, even though the Iranians shot it out of the sky. That’s all I’m saying. His enemies were lined up last night waiting for the opportunity to paint him as reckless.
Oh, I think that's likely. They'd have tried to hang this airliner around his neck.

But if you're implying it was a ploy for public attention in the event we retaliated... I don't think so.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29514 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:49 pm to
It didn’t say it was smack dab in the epicenter of it. The debris field I’m sure is very large, it’s simply in that.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28371 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Come on Chiz. The tip of a SAM is the homing device. Warhead is the explosives and cutting or frag parts behind it.


Could you disable the explosives in midflight, if you saw that it was headed to a bad target?

I was supposed to Go to The Hawk Missile School back in the day, but I kept getting bumped out. I am really interested in this stuff.
This post was edited on 1/8/20 at 10:00 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30546 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:56 pm to
I didn't realize that there were 82 Iranian passengers aboard. Sorta complicates my thinking on it.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22798 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:56 pm to
Hillary did it! Usually a safe assumption!
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19168 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

But if you're implying it was a ploy for public attention in the event we retaliated... I don't think so


I’m more implying that just like the talking heads and the Dems were absolutely sure an out of control Trump was going to respond in force last night, I think the Iranians were convinced he was going to respond as well. So why not target an airliner and watch the world blame Trump for their deaths because of his recklessness? And for anyone that doesn’t think they’d intentionally kill 200 people, the vast majority being Iranian, just keep in mind that they killed 1200 protestors not long ago, and didn’t bat an eye.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72420 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:00 pm to
Truth.

That conspiracy theory does make some logical sense.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19168 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:10 pm to
I think it might also explain why Iran is apparently not letting other countries in to investigate the crash. How are they gonna explain downing a commercial airliner with a missile when no hostile military operations took place inside Iran last night?
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28371 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

That conspiracy theory does make some logical sense.


It's just conspiratorial,(barely) beyond what I am willing to accept is possible right now. I reiterate" barely".
Posted by AUX3
Member since Dec 2010
3452 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:29 pm to
the Best question, why were they taking off at that time, I guess err body on that plane was ready to get the hell out of Iran

None of this makes sense
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28371 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

the Best question, why were they taking off at that time,


That's the first question that I asked on this board last night, and it is the most obvious one. And most unexplainable. I could understand thinking that you might want to get your plane out of there, but not with passengers on it.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29514 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

the Best question, why were they taking off at that time, I guess err body on that plane was ready to get the hell out of Iran



I was reading a tweet where this guys compared that flight from the past several days and it left at about the same time. He then compared takeoff speed and ascent rate and I think yesterday the ascent rate was a little fast but other than that normal flight that they routinely fly.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30546 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:43 pm to
Had I been a passenger on that plane I'd have been like, naw I'll pass. BUT then again, what next? Hanging around Tehran for a spell? Not necessarily a good alternative for those from other countries itself. That's maybe not even an attractive option for some Iranians themselves.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28371 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:54 pm to
People mess themselves up with rash decisions everyday I guess. They run red lights, so they aren't late for work, or late to meetings or to pick the kids up from school.

It's not unusual for them to pay for it some way. This was a big one though. Plane..missiles, war, what do I do?
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8203 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 10:57 pm to
I imagine those people were trying to get out before we started shooting back
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17425 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 11:01 pm to
Most random thing was the plane was inspected and passed on the 6th of January... like a 2 day gap with the time difference?
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28371 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

I imagine those people were trying to get out before we started shooting back


Ok, but we never did any shooting, The Iranians, however, who had control over that airport, Knew that they were going to do some shooting.
Why was the plane allowed to fly, full of passengers?
I hate the term " no brainer" but, shutting down commercial air traffic in that situation, comes pretty damn close to that definition.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8203 posts
Posted on 1/8/20 at 11:18 pm to
I wasn’t blaming anyone. It was an accident in a really hairy situation. More sad than anything.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram