1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie Gets the Republican Signatures: Epstein Files II Discharge Petition Will Force Vote
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:18 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:18 am to BBONDS25
I asked about a specific thing you claimed he said.
Come on now counselor. You know the rules.
I was curious to see if he actually said he was going to read them all. He didn’t say that. I understand the next pivot.
Come on now counselor. You know the rules.
I was curious to see if he actually said he was going to read them all. He didn’t say that. I understand the next pivot.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 8:19 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:18 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Just release them all
That's going to be a problem.
There are many who...regardless of how much is released...will never believe it was all released.
This will never end.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:18 am to roadGator
You're right, he just said he was prepared to read all of the redacted names.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:18 am to DeBoar
quote:
He’s only named like 6?
And we already knew those.
Epstein is dead....whybdont they direct their attention towards current pedophiles and bizzaro behaviors
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:21 am to JellyRoll
He did not say that in the interview being discussed.
The pivot is right on time though.
The pivot is right on time though.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:21 am to roadGator
quote:
I was curious to see if he actually said he was going to read them all. He didn’t say that.
The fact he said he was prepared to release them isn’t the win you think it is. He said he would reveal more names. Thats semantics. More vs all? And you think it’s a win? When will he release more names?
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:22 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Enough was already released to warrant an investigation. Never mind the unreleased documents remaining. And Trump has done jack shite with it.
Strange!
We declare we are for "Transparency in government", yet posters are downvoting this.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:24 am to BBONDS25
He didn’t say that either in that interview.
But why, RG, hasn’t he done this or that?
Well, Barry, I have zero ability to answer your question but I appreciate you trusting enough in my vast knowledge enough to ask.
Barry, what was Trump thinking Tuesday at 4pm?
But why, RG, hasn’t he done this or that?
Well, Barry, I have zero ability to answer your question but I appreciate you trusting enough in my vast knowledge enough to ask.
Barry, what was Trump thinking Tuesday at 4pm?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:25 am to Gus007
Guy speaks as if he presumably knows a lot of what is in these documents that hasn't been "released."
Why not just spill the beans on what he knows?
Is there anything preventing him from doing so?
Why not just spill the beans on what he knows?
Is there anything preventing him from doing so?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:26 am to roadGator
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:27 am to JellyRoll
Keep waiting. Maybe you can stalk Massie and ask him.
If you really want to know instead of attempting some lame gotcha.
If you really want to know instead of attempting some lame gotcha.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:27 am to roadGator
quote:
He didn’t say that either in that interview.
Yes he did.
quote:
Well, Barry, I have zero ability to answer your question but I appreciate you trusting enough in my vast knowledge enough to ask.
What an out. I hope we don’t se you asking any questions about politicians in the board.
I’ll phrase it differently so as not to offend your sensibilities. I think it is evidence of Massie being disingenuous that he has access to the files and can release names anytime he wants. Instead he chooses to grandstand. No question in there. So it’s honest discourse.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:27 am to roadGator
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:31 am to BBONDS25
He thinks he is being clever and skating gracefully avoiding the truth. When in actuality
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:35 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Just release them all.
Agreed. Anyone who was aware of what he did needs to be jailed. Hell, I'd jail anyone who had a long friendship or working relationship with him, as there's no way in hell that they wouldn't know what he was doing.
It doesn't matter their status or political party. Whether it's Bill Clinton, half of Hollywood, and Donald Trump, so be it. Lock them all up.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:36 am to RammerJammer91
Please don’t say any of that again. Not for me, for you.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:37 am to davyjones
quote:
Please don’t say any of that again. Not for me, for you.
You don't think anyone who knew what Epstein was doing should be locked up? Or that people who were friends with him for decades didn't know?
That's messed up, man.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:40 am to RammerJammer91
This isn’t a who or what do you or don’t you support thing, just to be clear. Not in my case anyway. Not in this particular instance.
I’d firstly and probably most importantly as you this, can you cite the crime or crimes with which they should be charged with, in your view?
I’d firstly and probably most importantly as you this, can you cite the crime or crimes with which they should be charged with, in your view?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:41 am to davyjones
quote:
I’d firstly and probably most importantly as you this, can you cite the crime or crimes with which they should be charged with, in your view?
For example, Bill Clinton was friends with him for decades and appeared on several flights with him. You're telling me he knew NOTHING about what Epstein was doing?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:46 am to DMAN1968
quote:
The average voter in this country couldn't pick Hegseth out of a picture with him and 4 woman in it. Come to think of it...the same goes for Massie.
Hegseth won't matter in the midterms And Massie won't matter after the midterms.
Massie is running again in 2028...I guess we get to look forward to many more Massie threads in the near future.
I agree about this not being important to most voters. I'm just saying that, since the impeachment will be an open question, those that hate Hegseth---particularly leftist media---will have an excuse to run hit pieces on Hegseth.
If the Iran War isn't wrapped up by 2027, you will see lots of Massie prepping for his presidential run.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 8:59 am
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News