
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie Gets the Republican Signatures: Epstein Files II Discharge Petition Will Force Vote
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:30 am to Jbird
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:30 am to Jbird
In general?
Changing minds here.
This place isn’t a place for that.
It wasn’t a comment directed related to a specific post.
What did you think about the rest of my post that actually answered your question?
Changing minds here.
This place isn’t a place for that.
It wasn’t a comment directed related to a specific post.
What did you think about the rest of my post that actually answered your question?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:31 am to IvoryBillMatt
We need a "beating a dead horse" emoticon.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:34 am to roadGator
quote:About his indy run?
What did you think about the rest of my post that actually answered your question?
Pretty much correct imho
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:34 am to Jbird
quote:
Why would I as an industry give money to an indy candidate that will not win
Industries don't vote. If the Dems win the House and hold hearings to show how much corporations are in bed with the Trump Administration, there will be a backlash among millions of voters.
For those who can't stand the crazy Democrats, enough voters will turn to Massie/Tucker-Kent-Gabbard-? from name recognition alone.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:37 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:No shite, they buy votes from people.
Industries don't vote.
quote:
If the Dems win the House and hold hearings to show how much corporations are in bed with the Trump Administration, there will be a backlash among millions of voters.
quote:Sure they will.
For those who can't stand the crazy Democrats, enough voters will turn to Massie/Tucker-Kent-Gabbard-? from name recognition alone.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:42 am to alabamabuckeye
quote:
Sure bud, here you go: Jes Staley Leon Black Les Wexner David Copperfield Lapo Elkann Tom Pritzker Glenn Dubin Frédéric Fekkai Edoardo Teodorani Jean-Luc Brunel Daniel Siad Ramsey Elkholy Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Lesley Groff
Which teenaged groupies did they boink?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:55 am to DeBoar
quote:
When is he going to name all the names? He’s only named like 6?
And he named those six names that had already been public for many moons, as if it were a great revelation at that particular moment in time.
I get what he's doing, but:
A). He's grandstanding and throwing shade at Johnson and Trump on his way out the door to a cushy private sector job, and
B). He knows nothing will happen because he knows the names of the people who he hasn't publicly named. They would erase him.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 10:08 am to roadGator
quote:
You have named names in the Epstein files in the past. Can we expect you to name more names in the coming weeks and months?” Welker said.
Massie’s response:
“Yes.”
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:09 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Massie’s response:
“Yes.”
He named additional names within weeks and months. Where's the lie?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:18 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
I don't care about this stuff. I'd much prefer the victims lay out on a list who messed with them.
That would be great.
It doesn't change the fact that the DOJ hasn't complied with Epstein Files Transparency Act I. Epstein Files Transparency Act 2 will help force compliance.
None of us know what's in the Files. The whole thing might be a nothing burger in terms of punishing additional perps.
Just follow the law that Trump signed. Release all the Files.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:22 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Quality melt you are having along with your BF
Quite the contrary.
I'm not the one that rails against the guy wanting to expose child predators. How about you?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:23 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Raising money for his next campaign whining about stuff he can fix.
That's not a grift, lol. Try again
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:26 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:
I'm not the one that rails against the guy wanting to expose child predators. How about you?
Waiting patiently for him and Khana to expose child predators.
Epstein died 7 years ago. How many more years must we wait for these two to come good with their promises?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:26 am to SDVTiger
And Elkholy who never did anything illegal. He introduced adult women to Epstein and tried to get Epstein to use his connections to Victoria Secret and Vera Wang to get them modeling jobs. So Massie without evidence went onto the House floor and blasted an innocent guy.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:30 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:
That's not a grift, lol. Try again
Of course it is. He can name names. He has access. He gets you dummies to send him money while he whines about names he has access to not being released. Clearly grift.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:31 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:
I'm not the one that rails against the guy wanting to expose child predators. How about you?
We are waiting. When is he going to expose them?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:32 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
He named additional names within weeks and months. Where's the lie?
So…we don’t need the files anymore? Or are there more names he isn’t releasing?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:43 am to BBONDS25
quote:
…we don’t need the files anymore? Or are there more names he isn’t releasing?
By volume, only about half of the Files have been released. So, who knows what's in the other half that hasn't been released.
There's a law on the books. DOJ is not complying with it. There is about to be a new law on the books that will help with enforcing compliance, among other things.
Massie might be completely full of shite. He might also have done a great service to the nation in ramming through this legislation.
Time will tell. The DOJ should comply with the law.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 11:49 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:51 am to BBONDS25
quote:
He gets you dummies to send him money while he whines about names he has access to not being released.
So that's politicians work. So Trump is nothing more than a grifter by your definition. Because he promised things on the campaign trail and clearly had no intention of delivering. Was naming names a campaign promise of Massie?

Popular
Back to top


1







