Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Massachusetts federal judges openly ignoring SCOTUS TPS ruling

Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116614 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27316 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:23 pm to
I don't know what kind of sanctions against rogue judges may exist, but clearly they should suffer for their lack of accountability and failure to submit to the Supreme Court.
Posted by jcolding41
Member since Sep 2015
5925 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:27 pm to
It must take the patience of a saint to not let this BS affect yourself too much...
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14614 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 5:39 am to
First, their decision should be ignored and anyone enacting their decision should be arrested by federal authorities.
Second, the judges should be removed from office by federal authorities.
Posted by tigerfootball10
Member since Sep 2005
10249 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:24 am to
quote:

Massachusetts federal judges openly ignoring SCOTUS TPS ruling

If it walks like a communist and talks like a communist……
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6858 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:40 am to
quote:

the judges should be removed from office by federal authorities.


Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to do.

Requires simple majority in the House, but two thirds of the Senate.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54984 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:40 am to
Until Congress handles it we will remain in a crisis that will only get worse
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20538 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 6:54 am to
I dont think we envisioned rogue judges defying the supreme court, or we would not have made the vote so difficult in Congress.

But if thats the way they want it. Federal Courthouses are federal real estate under the purview of the executive branch.......padlock their courthouse, which will be the same as removing them. Its no more drastic than judges openly defying the supreme court or overstepping their bounds with these nationwide edicts.

In the meantime the deportations continue, otherwise the executive will be in violation of what the supreme court has ruled.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28819 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:09 am to
Didn't Lincoln abolish the DC Circuit during the war?
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 7:11 am
Posted by Gifman
Captiva, FL
Member since Jan 2021
19463 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:10 am to
Posted by AUJACK
Member since Sep 2020
1480 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:36 am to
Ignore the judge's stay. It's already been ruled upon. Ship them out fast and round up more just to prove a point and let the Judge know she is the reason why the focus is on getting TPS Africans the f out of this country.

There should be an easy process of financially hurt the rogue judges. There is a process for removing (impeachment) but that is difficult with the socialist democratic party.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116614 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:41 am to
quote:

There should be an easy process of financially hurt the rogue judges.


There is. House GOP tried to cut Boasberg's office and staff, but a few defectors voted against it.

Traitors first, then invaders.
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 7:45 am
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24390 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I don't know what kind of sanctions against rogue judges may exist, but clearly they should suffer for their lack of accountability and failure to submit to the Supreme Court.

They can and should be impeached for misconduct by Congress.

The GOPe wants them to obstruct so nothing happens.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
7383 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:57 am to



THAT's A MAN!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25046 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:12 am to
Basically none because the legal field has made themselves a joke.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59950 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:39 am to
There needs to be serious repercussions for judges who rule contrary to decisions SCOTUS has already made. In a better world it would be considered malfeasance and the penalty would be removal from office.

But alas, the Constitution gives federal judges a very wide latitude of qualified immunity (for lack of a better term) for their poor rulings.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram