- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:39 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:I hate that he is being prosecuted, but this post is nonsense. The "evidence against him" is that he killed someone, and that is undisputed. He will be attempting to JUSTIFY that action by relying upon "defense of others." As usual, I suggest that looking at the applicable statute is a good starting point in ANALYZING the applicability of that statute:
Evidence against him is non existent. He'll be found not guilty and NYC will burn.
quote:Like it or not, and absent jury nullification, the guy has some potential exposure under this statute.
Sec. 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person.
1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use physical force upon another person ... to the extent he ... reasonably believes such to be necessary to defend ... a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person ....
2. A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person under circumstances specified in subdivision one unless:
(a) The actor reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to use deadly physical force. Even in such case, however, the actor may not use deadly physical force if he or she knows that with complete personal safety, to oneself and others he or she may avoid the necessity of so doing by retreating ...
(b) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible criminal sexual act or robbery ....
The prosecution will argue that subsection 35.15(1) is not applicable, because Penny used DEADLY physical force, rather than just "physical force." As such, they will argue that it was not enough that the bystanders were in danger of "unlawful physical force," they must have been facing the imminent use of "deadly phyical force" by Neely. They will argue that Neely was not about to engage in DEADLY physical force and that any belief to the contrary by Penny was not "reasonable."
This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:40 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:Nope. Sorry
If convicted any idea what one count of second degree manslaughter (assuming that is what they end up charging him with) would carry in NY with someone with a (again assuming) clean record?
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:40 pm to EKG
Queue up the CNN feel good stories about how friendly street performers are and how they'll never harm anyone, yet are often misunderstood.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:42 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Queue up the CNN feel good stories
Kudos.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:44 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
How much have you donated to his legal defense fund?
I prefer to keep my financial matters private, to include donations.
I wish, however, I could do more than I have.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:50 pm to EKG
quote:That may be the most-polite "none of your damned business" that I have ever seen.
I prefer to keep my financial matters private, to include donations.
I wish, however, I could do more than I have.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:51 pm to EKG
He's the living embodiment of our strong jawed Patriot meme guy. It's him.


This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:52 pm to EKG
Still won’t bring back the homeless black loser
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:54 pm to SirWinston
quote:Except for the 1980s pro-wrestling, pretty-boy haircut.
He's literally our strong jawed Patriot meme guy
He looks like Viggo Mortensen with this guy's coiffure:
This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:03 pm to EKG
Another reason I left new orleans.
As a white guy im not going to keep myself in a situation where i might have to fend for my life and have all Democrats on my jury.
As a white guy im not going to keep myself in a situation where i might have to fend for my life and have all Democrats on my jury.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:04 pm to EKG
He’s screwed. A NY jury will convict and he will not win appeals.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
He was just a poor harmless Michael Jackson impersonator that had 44 arrests and kidnapped a 7 year old and beat an old lady on the subway so bad that she broke her face.
He’ll get a statue outside the subway entrance with that resume.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:07 pm to EKG
Insane. Its clearly a black / white thing
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:23 pm to AggieHank86
I get that you jerk off to the idea of letting an innocent man get real jail time, but at some point, even you must have some sort of conscience.
This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:30 pm to EKG
Reap the whirlwind New Yorkers. Reap it but good. And please...don't come south.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:30 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Another reason I left new orleans. As a white guy im not going to keep myself in a situation where i might have to fend for my life and have all Democrats on my jury.
Exactly.
People need to think long and hard about what “jury of your peers” means depending on where you live now.
the political polarization of everything extends to the jury box, you don’t want to be in a shithole
Posted on 6/14/23 at 5:30 pm to AggieHank86
According to what I read, it’s a minimum 3 years and a maximum 5 to 15 years.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 6:12 pm to EKG
quote:
I prefer to keep my financial matters private, to include donations.
I wish, however, I could do more than I have.

Posted on 6/14/23 at 6:17 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:In all seriousness, I ask “Can you fricking read, moron?“
SouthEasternKaiju
Are you truly too fricking stupid to grasp the difference between personal preferences and objective review of the relevant statute?
since almost the first time I saw you post, I have been utterly convinced that you are a drooling imbecile, but this post really takes the cake.
This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 6:20 pm
Popular
Back to top



1








