Looks like fraud in the KY-04 race

So you admit the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

quote:

---

Yes, as I stated at the time when I voted for him

---

Sure, you voted for Trump.

Stolen elections have consequences?

This is like claiming Melissa Hortman was killed by a devious maga assassin. An unheard of state house rep, precision targeted for death, is the same as launching bullets at the president of the united states head on loop. Both sides do it!

Acknowledging the dems steal a presidential election and then trying to BOTH SIDES DO IT - R's unveil their master voter fraud schemes to take out another R to claim a single district in Kentucky, for themselves, again, but with a different guy!

You're a fricking retard person that is too stupid to realize you're the equivalent of old white ladies marching around with their no kings posters

It makes perfect sense, you're desperate, you're trying to cope. Dems see other dems committing violence all over the place, they cope by trying to claim maga assassins are everywhere, taking out state reps no one has ever heard of, while simultaneously using it to dismiss endless shots at the president.

You aren't capable of accepting that you've miscalculated and have been wrong the entire time, your assessment of the situation is incorrect- this is you implementing the same mental gymnastics.

The value comparison of the two does not compute. No one can acknowledge a stolen presidential election and then seriously turn around and try to claim the other side has the same ability, but they only use it on each other, for a single district in Kentucky. This would be absurd. As absurd as an army of maga assassins taking out unheard of state reps

There were anomalies in the 2020 election worth investigating. So, if you've got an actual argument that fraud happened here, I'm happy to hear it.

The Sam Parker guy you're citing may or may not be credible, but goes on to beg for money for his legal fees in post #6 of his thread (I guess Kash's girlfriend is suing him for defamation.), so that somewhat increases the odds this is clickbait to get money, but let's hear him out.

It seems, though, like the only thing the Sam guy in your OP says is Massie got more votes (19.1% more) in 2026 than 2024, and turnout was 100% more, so he doesn't understand how he could lose.

Hmm...

Someone else in the thread (a guy named Kurt) asks Grok for the # of registered voters in KY-04. Grok replies: 600,314 total voters and ~311k Republican. The May 19th primary had 105,361 votes cast... so while a 100% increase in votes from 2024 to 2026 might sound extraordinary when stated that way, in truth, a 100% increase in turnout means only slightly more than 1/3 of Republicans showed up this week. That might be high for a primary, but doesn't appear to be the type of cheating that happened in Arizona where turnout was strangely close to 100% in some areas...

If you can find counties or voting districts where unusual turnout happened, by all means bring it up. Otherwise, it doesn't sound like a big deal.

Here's that exchange / post I'm referencing, btw... if you care:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

The same Kurt guy who asked Grok about #s of voters goes on to ask how Gallrein motivated people to show up since Massie supposedly had more small donors and Gallrein didn't draw crowds like Massie. Grok answers: it was the most expensive House primary in US history with ~$30M spent, a lot of TV ads, Trump's endorsement, and other factors driving greater than average turnout. And that this pattern seems consistent with other primaries that were high-profile and had high-spending.

So, in 2024, in a low pressure race against nobodies, Massie gets about 40k votes (approx 13% of 311k republican voters). The nobodies got approx 4%.

In 2026, in the most expensive primary in history in a hotly contested race for which people were motivated to show up, Massie gets 47.5k votes. While that's a 19.1% increase from 2024, it's still only ~15% of republican voters (47.5k / 311k), so it doesn't seem that odd.

If you disagree, please explain.

As I see it, this election was run far more efficiently than 2020. Shortly after the polls closed, the numbers were counted and Gallrein announced winner the same day... that's with a 100% increase in voter turnout over 2024. That didn't happen in 2020... where counting mysteriously stopped and restarted in the middle of the night in some places without poll watchers. In Philly, counting continued for something retarded like a week after election day.

Do you still think Sam's simplistic analysis suggests cheating? If so, how? If you think cheating was done another way... like Dominion machines and votes were flipped or illegal votes were counted, explain. I'd be happy to declare Gallrein's win as fraudulent if it proves elections aren't secure and leads to ditching crap voting machines and passing the Save Act.

So, what's your actual argument here?

What level of cope is this? Perhaps the increases are a product of a national focus on the race, increased spending, Trump endorsing a candidate, all of which raised the profile locally of the race, which in turn drove more voters to the polls. The attention on this race would certainly increase turnout, especially for those motivated to vote against Massie. The voters obviously wanted Massie out, thus he lost.

Edit: Just saw epbart had the same thinking I did and posted a lot more detail.

I always find it funny when people only think one side is capable of cheating. The Uniparty only wants Uniparty candidates.

quote:

---

Looks like fraud in the KY-04 race

---

> 75% of the people did not vote. Was the "fraud" some sort of voter suppression?