- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:43 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:43 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
now you are just making Murrays case. LOL
I'm not making any case. We're at the "stating facts" portion.
0
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sontamayor and Jackson....they're more likely to bend towards partisanship.
I think Jackson is on the side of the good guys in this case.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:44 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Absolutely not the case
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:44 am to Mickey Goldmill
You wouldn’t vote for Lincoln, TR, Ike or Reagan if they were resurrected by Jesus Christ.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:44 am to rt3
That’s what being a democrat is.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:45 am to Wiseguy
quote:
While the SC *can* do whatever they want in terms of how much rationale and descriptive language they use in the decision, I would imagine some of them can’t wait to slap down the NGO and the CO SOS for their “novel” arguments before the court. To do so, I see them addressing the issues that overlap with federal law and criminal law (how do we determine someone is a insurrectionist).
I think they reverse the decision but the majority opinion does not discuss this in detail, because I think they will rule, as the trial court did, that 14A doesn't apply to the President. That makes the remainder of the discussion moot (although, this is where I imagine concurrences will discuss the issue).
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:45 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
It never gets old to see the mob demand adherence to emotional-rage responses, and anything but that means you support the worst interpretation of their perceived enemy.
quote:
Every single time
That’s hilarious. 4 years you adhered to emotionally-rage that was programmed into you…. Most of the same which you have completely dismissed these past three years… and you respond to that? All the left has is programmed emotional rage. Notice how the word “xenophobia” has disappeared from the lexicon lately? An example of programming-de programming of emotional rage from you on the left. Switch on…. Switch off. Zero. Absolute zero independent thought.
Yet you try to project that on someone else?
you folks never change. 
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:45 am to oogabooga68
I give him and SFP some credit for showing up here to gaslight after that beatdown. if nothing else, they are true and undyingly loyal soldiers for their cause.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:46 am to Lynxrufus2012
I guess Bill Clinton wasnt a real democrat back in the 90's when his policies sounded a whole lot like Trump's do today?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:46 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I give him and SFP some credit for showing up here to gaslight after that beatdown.
Gaslight?
quote:
if nothing else, they are true and undyingly loyal soldiers for their cause.
...what are you talking about?
I've always said the USSC will overturn the COSC. I have literally never waivered from that position.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
think they reverse the decision but the majority opinion does not discuss this in detail, because I think they will rule, as the trial court did, that 14A doesn't apply to the President. That makes the remainder of the discussion moot (although, this is where I imagine concurrences will discuss the issue).
Fair enough.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:46 am to Mickey Goldmill
Sorry about this butt kicking you leftists took today.
Sadly it keeps other states from booting Dementia Joe
Sadly it keeps other states from booting Dementia Joe
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
guilty" and "innocent" are not terms used in civil trials.
Congratulations on being the king of strawmen and non sequitur arguments.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Im convinced some just come here for the rush of being outraged.
It never gets old to see the mob demand adherence to emotional-rage responses, and anything but that means you support the worst interpretation of their perceived enemy.
Some of same ones giving you grief labeled me a Biden supporter to gen up their outrage level when I suggested Trump maybe isn’t a messiah.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 11:52 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:47 am to CleverUserName
quote:
That’s hilarious. 4 years you adhered to emotionally-rage that was programmed into you…. Most of the same which you have completely dismissed these past three years… and you respond to that?
All the left has is programmed emotional rage. Notice how the word “xenophobia” has disappeared from the lexicon lately? An example of programming-de programming of emotional rage from you on the left. Switch on…. Switch off. Zero. Absolute zero independent thought.
Yet you try to project that on someone else?
you folks never change.
And as usual, you use general arguments that don't apply to me because anyone who doesn't support trump on this board is prog commie filth. Sad....
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:48 am to AmishSamurai
quote:
Congratulations on being the king of strawmen and non sequitur arguments.
Um...what?
quote:
In a civil trial dealing with a novel claim, one is guilty until proven innocent?
quote:
No.
"guilty" and "innocent" are not terms used in civil trials.
Shouldn't you be saying that to the other guy?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:49 am to roadGator
quote:
Sorry about this butt kicking you leftists took today.
Huh? This case should have never gone this far. Opens a huge can of worms if States started doing this.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:A good case was also made for differentiating running for office vs holding office in application of the 14th. The problem for that narrow a ruling is after Trump is elected, the claim could resurface. Brown went surprisingly hard after the premise that the 14th does not specifically name the POTUS or VP, and she cited the basis for that.
I think they reverse the decision but the majority opinion does not discuss this in detail, because I think they will rule, as the trial court did, that 14A doesn't apply to the President. That makes the remainder of the discussion moot (although, this is where I imagine concurrences will discuss the issue).
In disagreement with others here, this sounds to me like it could go 9-0. Certainly it should.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:56 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Im convinced some just come here for the rush of being outraged.
Some of same ones giving you grief labeled me a Biden supporter to gen up their outrage level when I suggested Trump maybe isn’t a messiah.
It always happens.
Content creator: creates story/tweet with misleading language intended for priming audience
Echo chamber: spreads the misleading language and accepts it unquestionably as a hive mind, gets angry in response to intended priming
Rational actor: that creator was wrong, and he's manipulating you with that deception so that you get fearful, then angry, and spread his content.
Echo Chamber: YOUR LACK OF RAGE SHOWS YOU ARE A LEFTIST WHO MAY RAPE CHILDREN.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:58 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
if nothing else, they are true and undyingly loyal soldiers for their cause.
(D)-hadists.....
Page 12 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News