Started By
Message

re: Liberals using Charlie’s 2A position against him

Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:14 pm to
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6585 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:14 pm to
Liberals argue any topic based on feelings. Charlie argued based on logic, reasoning, and conviction.

I have absolutely no doubt that Charlies positions would remain the same even if he had known how his life on earth would end.

Because he argued what was right. And he knew that righteousness rarely ends with a "happily ever after." At least here.
Posted by 49erReb
San Diego
Member since Dec 2013
78 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:31 pm to
It's not to disparage him, it's to point out he was one of the unfortunate deaths.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
17278 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:32 pm to
Using his words to promote his views while thinking that they got a gotcha
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2660 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:37 pm to
That 2A excerpt was cut short & taken out of context. I don’t care what the issue is, or who is the presenter, this type of BS pisses me off and let’s whomever is on the other side of the argument know you don’t have a good case

What Charlie is saying here is it is a calculated decision, and deaths are inevitable in the same way deaths will happen with vehicle traffic. The Pros far outweigh the Cons. And more people die from vehicle crashes than guns each year yet those idiots aren’t calling to ban cars
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
51023 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Charlie saying we will inevitably have gun deaths as long as we have 2A but it’s worth it to protect all our God given rights.


He’s right.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42772 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 5:45 pm to

Facts and F'tards are forever strangers
Posted by Mizzou68
Member since Nov 2013
211 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:07 pm to
A simple question for these anti- gun libs would be” there are somewhere between 200-400 million firearms in the legal possession of US citizens. What is your proposal?”
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162915 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:08 pm to
It is everywhere bot repeated like it was preplanned.
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
16557 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:03 pm to
He was right. If the state can use deaths as a rationale to eliminate one of your rights then the state can use deaths as a rationale to eliminate all of your other rights too.

These people are just too small minded to look that far into the future. They just think that saving one kid's life is worth handing every single thing that allows you to live freely over to authority forever.
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:15 pm to
"get rid of guns or we will use them to kill you".

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109736 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:18 pm to
I’m at the point where I don’t give two shits about their pathetic efforts to whatabout any of this stuff anymore.

They have lost.

They are lost.

frick ‘em.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
26333 posts
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:21 pm to
It'd impossible to be a gotcha. That's what mags the left so dumb. It's what Kirk believed and he was willing to give his life for that belief.

Hes an example of how far people should go when it comes to morals and beliefs, and what they truly mean.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram