- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Letter from FDA to physicians on acetaminophen use
Posted on 9/24/25 at 2:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 9/24/25 at 2:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:How so? Were there 40 or so studies that looked at pregnancy/tylenol/autism? Of those studies, did 25+ say their was a link between tylenol and autism in children? While 15 or so said their was not?
grossly misled in the press conference.
2
Posted on 9/24/25 at 2:56 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Can some of the experts tell me if John’s Hopkins is reputable?
Not as reputable as the Japanese and Swedish studies posted. Obviously.
It was me Johnny Hopkins and Sloan Kettering. And they were blazing that shite up everyday.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 9/24/25 at 2:59 pm to the808bass
quote:
Follow up question. How many Pharma studies can be replicated? I’d even accept a rough estimate of percentages.
I don’t know. Definitely less than half due to a variety of factors. By replicated do you mean simply replicated or replicated with similar results?
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:00 pm to RollTide4547
But muh Swedish double-blind, triple random, placebo controlled, Japanese twin sibling, quadruple peer reviewed study?!?!!?
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:02 pm to RollTide4547
quote:
How so? Were there 40 or so studies that looked at pregnancy/tylenol/autism? Of those studies, did 25+ say there was a link between tylenol and autism in children? While 15 or so said there was not?
I’ve recently addressed that in this thread. Those 27 studies were highly criticized by the scientific community for not controlling for confounding variables. In other words, they were less than rigorous. Larger more rigorous studies that controlled for confounding variables and had sibling controls showed no association. Those were conveniently left out of the presser
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:08 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:Questions. 1) Do the criticizing scientists happen to get any funding from the drug company? 2) If pregnant women choose to not take tylenol (and tylenol truly doesn't have anything to do with autism) are those women and the babies worse off?
Those 27 studies were highly criticized by the scientific community for not controlling for confounding variables. In other words, they were less than rigorous. Larger more rigorous studies that controlled for confounding variables and had sibling controls showed no association. Those were conveniently left out of the presser
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:08 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Cool. Show us the links where you read that “the scientific community” whoeverthefrick that is, highly criticized all of this research, including studies from Harvard, Cedars-Sinai, Johns Hopkins, and apparently Tylenol itself. And while you’re at it, show us where this community said the remaining studies were somehow more valid.
Until then, we'll imply your bias based on your post history and ignore you accordingly.
Until then, we'll imply your bias based on your post history and ignore you accordingly.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:13 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:"In 2017, Tylenol made a social media post that has recently resurfaced, where it advised a user that it does not recommend its products for pregnant women." Who would know more about the product and its effects, the people that made it or the "scientific community"?
LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:21 pm to RollTide4547
stout posted this in the other thread
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:22 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Ok
stout posted this in the other thread
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:26 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I like the way you put it "least bad option"... my daughter, when pregnant, was more or less told "if you need something, tylenol is the only safe thing to take when pregnant ". What she heard was "tylenol=safe".
I think I like "least bad" better.
You got it - you sound like a clinician - I like to tell people that there's no risk free decisions (even not taking meds) and we're going to "pick the smallest shark in the tank".
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:34 pm to cajunangelle
Ironically, your pager analogy shows the very same correlation does not equal causation problem that you refuse to accept.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:38 pm to RollTide4547
." Who would know more about the product and its effects, the people that made it or the "scientific community"?
Both are scientists
Both are scientists
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:46 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Trump: Water is wet
Left: No, WAY! Trump is no hydrologist
Left: No, WAY! Trump is no hydrologist
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:49 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
scientific community for not controlling for confounding variables. In other words, they were less than rigorous.
But every damn Leftist swallowed every load Anthony Fauci pumped out.
That Mask Science was top notch.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 3:58 pm to riccoar
quote:
That Mask Science was top notch.
You forget social distancing... three feet? nine feet? six feet? ah, hell, who cares, pick one and say "Science".
Posted on 9/24/25 at 4:04 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Definitely less than half due to a variety of factors.
He says without a hint of self-awareness.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 4:08 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
It's all over the web-i-verse, all over the news and people everywhere have JUST become aware of this BECAUSE the Mango Menace dared speak on it.
This is a great point.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 4:21 pm to RollTide4547
quote:
Questions. 1) Do the criticizing scientists happen to get any funding from the drug company? 2) If pregnant women choose to not take tylenol (and tylenol truly doesn't have anything to do with autism) are those women and the babies worse off?
1 . I don’t think so. . I’m talking about criticisms in the literature mostly.
2 . Of course not.
If there is a need to take, Always be cautious and the least recommended dose and under physician advisement when pregnant. That’s pretty much for any medicine.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 9/24/25 at 4:28 pm to riccoar
quote:
But every damn Leftist swallowed every load Anthony Fauci pumped out. That Mask Science was top notch.
You’re barking up the wrong tree with me, man. I wasn’t in that group. You can thank Trump for the fast tracking.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 4:33 pm
Page 8 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News