Started By
Message

re: Layoffs begin at Atlanta-based CDC, other U.S. health agencies

Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Because they shite the bed during their last big test.



So the answer is just, no people helping control outbreaks. Great idea
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22726 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I guess we'll never know how many people would have died to prove this out.... wonder why

What we do know is that for everyone under the age of about 35, Covid was less lethal than the flu. For those older than that but younger than about 65/70, and not obese or otherwise already very unwell, Covid was moderately more lethal than the flu. Those truly at risk from Covid fell into pretty clear/specific groups - the very old, the very obese, and the already very unwell. For them Covid was a nasty, nasty virus that was life threatening.

Consider all of that and explain how the CDC did good work, and the $6-8 trillion spent on Covid response wasn't more harmful than helpful.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75368 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Sure



You could have left it at that, but still had to get in one more all caps horse dewormer.

Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:42 pm to
Yeah because it's stupid ha
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14671 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

atlgamecockman


We found the person (female, likely) who works at the CDC (BamaATL, likely).
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32068 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Atlanta-based CDC

quote:

atlgamecockman

Did you not make the cut atlgamecockman? I hear concession workers are in high demand for Braves home games.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:45 pm to
Here ya go... this is from yesterday...

LINK

You really think this guy has the answers?




Caption: "Screengrabs from Joe Grinsteiner’s facebook video where he eats veterinary-grade ivermectin paste."
This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 2:47 pm
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:50 pm to
They could use me in the bullpen more honestly
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55738 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Lol horse medicine... anything to not give an inch to people with actual expertise... keep feeling those feelings bro, they're just as good as decades of research


That horse paste ivermectin has been used for decades to prevent blindness and treat/prevent other parasitic diseases common in Africa and other equatorial countries, ivermectin has likely prevented the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

parasitic diseases


And covid, is that a parasitic disease?
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13193 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:55 pm to
Good!
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28133 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

So the answer is just, no people helping control outbreaks. Great idea


So your answer is just keep them all and make no changes. Great idea.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:00 pm to
Nah how about go after all the contracts with defense contractors who charge $500 for hammers etc... might get more bang for buck there than a researcher making like 70k a year.


Think of it this way:

Prevent preventable disease outbreaks -> people don't die -> people continue contributing to the economy for their whole lives

Defense contractors overcharging DOD -> American people lose money -> endless ballooning of defense budget to keep up


Which would you go after?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75368 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:


Yeah because it's stupid ha


It's also a dewormer and antiparasitic for humans, and labeled and approved as such, but you guys can't help but keep claiming it's a HORSE dewormer. That's stupid ha, right? I'm not challenging your statement about whether it's effective or approved for covid treatment, but why continue to say it's a HORSE dewormer when it's also an approved human antiparasitic?
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:04 pm to
Because it's nuts that people go to the ag store to take things not prescribed and risk overdose and death as opposed to seeking professional help... that's what's stupid... if you have a parasitic infection that requires ivermectin to treat, the doctor will prescribe that.... with an appropriate dose that will not kill you, whereas if you take half a tube of horse dewormer with a totally different, not designed for humans dose, you could end up comatose
This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 3:08 pm
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10660 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:06 pm to
Going after defense contractors has nothing to do with cleaning up the CDC scum.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28133 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Nah how about go after all the contracts with defense contractors who charge $500 for hammers etc...


Why not both? I can actually criticize two wasteful programs at once; you should try it.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22726 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Nah how about go after all the contracts with defense contractors who charge $500 for hammers etc

We should do this, also. No doubt about it.

quote:

Prevent preventable disease outbreaks -> people don't die -> people continue contributing to the economy for their whole lives

Defense contractors overcharging DOD -> American people lose money -> endless ballooning of defense budget to keep up


Which would you go after?

Both, because your first line above is fantasy and your second line is reality.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4410 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:10 pm to
I drew the comparison on what the bang for buck would be. That's the comparison. If you're talking about government waste, I think preventing excess deaths probably is a good return on investment as opposed to allowing Northrop Grumman to keep fricking the military dry on pricing... make sense now? Can you hold that idea in your head?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28133 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Both, because your first line above is fantasy


Here's a more realistic version:

Fail to prevent disease outbreak -> people still die, wreck the shite out of the economy -> people continue to pay for massive government debt for their whole lives
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram