- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers present Presidential pardon to Tina Peters's jailers. Colorado: "So?"
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:46 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:46 pm to Ailsa
I think the problem (could be wrong) is that Peters was not authorized to access that data... even if it is required by Federal law.
What she did by choosing that path was to break the chain of custody and introduce doubt to the veracity of the data.
I still say the best strategy is to review that data. Strategically, if she did indeed find voter fraud there's a very good case in the court of public opinion this is political prosecution and she is being punished by CO for finding the truth. BUT... it has to be the truth.
If she broke the law and that data doesn't reveal fraud, then she just broke the law and is facing the consequences.
Don't get me wrong, I wish she had gone about it differently and exposed fraud without going to jail. But she didn't. The next best thing is to paint her as a political victim. But that hinges on what she actually found/copied.
What she did by choosing that path was to break the chain of custody and introduce doubt to the veracity of the data.
I still say the best strategy is to review that data. Strategically, if she did indeed find voter fraud there's a very good case in the court of public opinion this is political prosecution and she is being punished by CO for finding the truth. BUT... it has to be the truth.
If she broke the law and that data doesn't reveal fraud, then she just broke the law and is facing the consequences.
Don't get me wrong, I wish she had gone about it differently and exposed fraud without going to jail. But she didn't. The next best thing is to paint her as a political victim. But that hinges on what she actually found/copied.
1
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:55 pm to Ailsa
Who paid Peters's salary? Colorado, not the United States.
She was simply NOT a federal officer. Even if she were, she lost any protection from state prosecution when she acted unlawfully.
Aa much as I want her out of jail, that argument won't work. It's why you don't have federal marshalls at the Colorado prison right now demanding her release.
She was simply NOT a federal officer. Even if she were, she lost any protection from state prosecution when she acted unlawfully.
Aa much as I want her out of jail, that argument won't work. It's why you don't have federal marshalls at the Colorado prison right now demanding her release.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:56 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:good on them
Colorado officials said no...twice.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:58 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
How about this? Tina would be moved to federal custody for her protection if she is declared a witness. Trump knows what he's doing or he wouldn't have issue a pardon.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:14 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Trump knows what he's doing or he wouldn't have issue a pardon.
no he doesn't
well, sort of. he's very good at creating chaos
there's no colorado voter fraud, just a bunch of loon grifters
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:17 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:18 pm to beaux duke
quote:
there's no colorado voter fraud
your ignorance knows no bounds. 
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:19 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
You wouldn’t understand the meaning of innocent. It doesn’t serve your interests so she is guilty, amirite Judge Freisler? Use Google if you need to
What an extraordinarily irrational melt
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:21 pm to Ailsa
quote:now that's an excellent idea.
How about this? Tina would be moved to federal custody for her protection if she is declared a witness. Trump knows what he's doing or he wouldn't have issue a pardon.
Like I said, if she had sought whistleblower status that coulda been done day 1.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:22 pm to beaux duke
quote:
no he doesn't
well, sort of. he's very good at creating chaos
there's no colorado voter fraud, just a bunch of loon grifters
What a delicious melt
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:22 pm to MintBerry Crunch
Dumbass, I didn’t say I thought of this, that it had any merit, that it would work etc. but you buttholes have no reading comprehension.
I said I BELIEVE, that this is the admin.’s argument. That’s all.
God, some of you people are so retarded.
I said I BELIEVE, that this is the admin.’s argument. That’s all.
God, some of you people are so retarded.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:23 pm to Ailsa
Moonbats are losing their shart over this.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:23 pm to I20goon
quote:
She COULD have sought whistleblower protection(s). She didn't.
The reason why is she likely was wanting to parlay her 'hero status' into something else for personal gain.
I think she was just being manipulated by Lindell's agents because THEY sought that hero status.
They are evil pieces of shite for taking advantage of a grieving mother like this.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:28 pm to lsuguy84
He’s THE MOST liberal Governor in the country.
He’s a poll smoking idiot
He’s a poll smoking idiot
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:28 pm to I20goon
quote:
Don't get me wrong, I wish she had gone about it differently and exposed fraud without going to jail. But she didn't.
Not sure if she had a choice. They were going to destroy it. Didn't they lock her and her staff out of her office and computers before she committed the alleged crime?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
you aren’t aware of the federal government using its leverage to force Louisiana to change its legal drinking age?
That was via Congress, not a purely Executive move.
The Executive is extremely limited in its ability to force coercion. We had these discussions in depth with the sanctuary cities reaction under Trump 1. There is no real federal nexus here in reality. In fantasy of LARPers (like that letter posted)? Sure.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
On what charge?
For any of her state conviction(s).
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They are evil pieces of shite for taking advantage of a grieving mother like this.
The judge, AG and SOS are evil pieces of shite.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:29 pm to beachdude
quote:
Threaten the State of Colorado by informing the governor that the government of the United States will begin enforcing federal law in Colorado regarding the possession, sale, and distribution of cannabis.
That would be illegal.
Cannabis enforcement has no nexus with any fact related to this case.
Page 7 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News