- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:49 pm to cypher
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:49 pm to cypher
The court has chosen a preventive measure for a NABU employee suspected of passing confidential information to Russian special services. He will remain in custody
22.07.2025
The Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv granted the motion of the prosecutors of the Prosecutor General's Office and chose a preventive measure in the form of detention for a period of 60 days for an employee of the NABU, suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 1 of Article 111, Part 3 of Article 362 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
This is an employee of the closed unit "D-2" of the Central Office of the NABU, who spied for the FSB and, through an intermediary - a recruited agent of the Russian special services, Dmitry Ivanets, passed on information about Ukrainian law enforcement officers and civilians.
At least 60 episodes of transmission of restricted information have been documented. For each such transmission, he received funds on his bank card.
Yesterday in Kyiv, officers of the UCP and the SBU detained him.
The pre-trial investigation is ongoing.
Note: according to Article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine, a person is presumed innocent of committing a crime and cannot be subjected to criminal punishment until his guilt is proven in accordance with the law and established by a court verdict of guilty.
Ukraine Prosecutors Office
22.07.2025
The Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv granted the motion of the prosecutors of the Prosecutor General's Office and chose a preventive measure in the form of detention for a period of 60 days for an employee of the NABU, suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 1 of Article 111, Part 3 of Article 362 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
This is an employee of the closed unit "D-2" of the Central Office of the NABU, who spied for the FSB and, through an intermediary - a recruited agent of the Russian special services, Dmitry Ivanets, passed on information about Ukrainian law enforcement officers and civilians.
At least 60 episodes of transmission of restricted information have been documented. For each such transmission, he received funds on his bank card.
Yesterday in Kyiv, officers of the UCP and the SBU detained him.
The pre-trial investigation is ongoing.
Note: according to Article 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine, a person is presumed innocent of committing a crime and cannot be subjected to criminal punishment until his guilt is proven in accordance with the law and established by a court verdict of guilty.
Ukraine Prosecutors Office
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:56 pm to cypher
quote:
The court has chosen a preventive measure for a NABU employee suspected of passing confidential information to Russian special services. He will remain in custody
Yea know how many US government people are spying for China.
Tons.
Still doesn't mean that we should allow the president to control the only people who can investigate him.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:03 pm to Narax
quote:
Yea know how many US government people are spying for China.
Tons.
Irrelevant.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:40 pm to Narax
quote:
Yea you know none of that is true.
There are 5 or 6 on here that will never admit the obvious. That Ukraine is corrupt to the core and the US taxpayer has been shafted once again. They will defend Project Ukraine and Z to the death. It is their holy war. Not saying Russia is any better, but to play like Ukraine is a democracy is a joke. The people of Ukraine have always been the victim of corruption.
Trillions of US tax dollars have been wasted and/or stolen from the American people over the last 60 years. Can you imagine what this country would be if only a fraction of that had been spent here at home?
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:23 pm to AU86
quote:
Trillions of US tax dollars have been wasted and/or stolen from the American people over the last 60 years. Can you imagine what this country would be if only a fraction of that had been spent here at home?
There was an ammunition plant which made artillery shells in St. Louis which was built for WWII and pumped out shells until sometime after the Vietnam War. None of them passed inspection in all of those years.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:46 pm to AU86
quote:
There are 5 or 6 on here that will never admit the obvious. That Ukraine is corrupt to the core and the US taxpayer has been shafted once again. They will defend Project Ukraine and Z to the death. It is their holy war. Not saying Russia is any better, but to play like Ukraine is a democracy is a joke. The people of Ukraine have always been the victim of corruption.
Agreed, just because Ukraine is a better play for the US, and Russia was the aggressor does not mean that magically Ukraine can do no wrong.
It's the same with Israel, it's a better play for the US than the Hamas/Fatah side, but that doesn't mean they should be free from criticism and scrutiny.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 1:42 am to Narax
quote:
Still doesn't mean that we should allow the president to control the only people who can investigate him.
well... I'll bite my tongue here
Posted on 7/23/25 at 1:54 am to Narax
I guess the corruption was so bad even skeletor Pompeo couldnt show Graham how to clean it.....so they just decided to get rid of the oversight all together.
Why would zelensky worry. He got a US president impeached, he has laundered untold billions for them, he set up their biolabs. He mocked them in their congress chambers and the White House.
All of this and he still has some shills on US websites touting how great he is.
At this point the entire western world looks foolish to continue to take taxpayer money and pour into this corrupt hole.
Why would zelensky worry. He got a US president impeached, he has laundered untold billions for them, he set up their biolabs. He mocked them in their congress chambers and the White House.
All of this and he still has some shills on US websites touting how great he is.
At this point the entire western world looks foolish to continue to take taxpayer money and pour into this corrupt hole.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:14 am to trinidadtiger
Yeah, Ukraine is corrupt blah blah blah, from people living in Louisiana, Texas and Alabama 3 of the most corrupt states in world history. Every country is corrupted people travel more think more.
Concerning the War
July 21, 2025, 5:30 pm ET
Russian forces conducted a large-scale series of missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of July 20 to 21 that included over 400 drones as Russia continues to launch significantly larger strike packages in June and July 2025 than in January to May 2025. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces launched 426 Shahed-type strike drones and decoy drones from the directions of Bryansk and Oryol cities; Millerovo, Rostov Oblast; Shatalovo, Smolensk Oblast; and Primorsko-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar Krai.[1] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces also launched five Kh-46 Kinzhal aeroballistic missiles from the airspace over Tambov Oblast; four Kalibr cruise missiles from the Black Sea; one Iskander-K cruise missile from Millerovo; and 14 Kh-101 cruise missiles from the airspace over Saratov Oblast. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces shot down and suppressed 200 Shahed-type drones and 203 decoy drones that Ukrainian air defense fire and electronic warfare (EW) downed all the missiles. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that 23 strike drones hit three locations and that drone debris fell in 12 locations. Ukrainian officials reported that Russian strikes damaged civilian and critical infrastructure in Ivano-Frankivsk, Kyiv, and Kharkiv oblasts.[2] Kyiv City Military Administration Head Timur Tkachenko reported that the Russian strike damaged the entrance to a metro station in the city.[3] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that the Russian strikes injured 15 civilians and killed two.[4] Russia rarely launched over 200 drones per night between January and May 2025, and an overnight strike package consisting of over 400 drones — even if far below Russia's latest record high of 728 drones in one strike package — demonstrates the dramatic shift in Russia's ability to repeatedly launch larger-scale drone strikes in recent weeks since May 2025.
Ukraine's Western partners pledged additional military and financial assistance to Ukraine during a virtual meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (the Ramstein format) on July 21. Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal announced that Germany will transfer five Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine in the near future and that Germany will also send 200,000 Gepard shells to Ukraine.[5] German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius also confirmed that Germany will send five Patriot air defense systems and necessary interceptors to Ukraine.[6] Shmyhal stated that Canada will contribute an unspecified amount toward financing Ukraine's defense industrial base (DIB) via the "Danish model" (in which Ukraine's partners buy Ukrainian-manufactured weapons for the Ukrainian military) and allocated 20 million CAD ($14.6 million) to Ukrainian tank maintenance. Shmyhal stated that the Netherlands allocated 200 million euros (roughly $234 million) to fund Ukrainian production of interceptor drones to counter Russian Shahed-type drones and 125 million euros (roughly $146 million) for F-16 fighter jet maintenance. Shmyhal stated that Norway also allocated one billion euros (roughly $1.67 billion) to fund Ukrainian drone purchases in 2025, including 400 million euros (roughly $468 million) specifically to purchase drones from Ukraine's DIB.
British Defense Secretary John Healey announced during the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting on July 21 a "50-day drive" to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and help push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table.[7] Healey noted that the group needs to seize on US President Donald Trump's threat to impose "severe" 100 percent secondary tariffs on Russia's trade partners if there is no peace settlement to end Russia's war in Ukraine within 50 days from July 14.[8] ISW has consistently assessed that only significant Russian battlefield setbacks, enabled by timely and sufficient Western military assistance to Ukrainian forces, will force Putin to reconsider Russia's ability to militarily defeat Ukraine and bring him to the negotiating table.[9] Such setbacks will not happen in a matter of weeks and will likely require several months or campaign seasons, assuming that the West commits to properly equipping and aiding Ukrainian forces to the point that Ukraine could successfully conduct such operations.
Ukrainian officials discussed Ukraine's increasing defense industrial capacity amid ongoing European aid announcements. Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal stated that Ukraine's defense industrial base (DIB) can accommodate an additional $6 billion in investments and that Ukraine could use these funds to produce more first-person view (FPV) and interceptor drones and long-range weapons.[10] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that Ukraine intends to increase domestic defense production over the next six months.[11] Ukrainian Defense Procurement Agency Head Arzen Zhumadilov told Ukrainian television channel Kanal 24 that Ukraine has contracted with three companies, including one Ukrainian and one American company, to produce interceptor drones to counter Russian Shahed-type drones.[12] Zhumadilov stated that Ukraine's DIB currently has the capacity to produce eight to 10 million FPV drones per year but that the Ukrainian government will only be able to fund the procurement of four to 4.5 million drones in 2025 due to budgetary constraints.
Key Takeaways
Russian forces conducted a large-scale series of missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of July 20 to 21 that included over 400 drones as Russia continues to launch significantly larger strike packages in June and July 2025 than in January to May 2025.
Ukraine's Western partners pledged additional military and financial assistance to Ukraine during a virtual meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (the Ramstein format) on July 21.
British Defense Secretary John Healey announced during the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting on July 21 a "50-day drive" to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and help push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table.
Ukrainian officials discussed Ukraine's increasing defense industrial capacity amid ongoing European aid announcements.
Ukraine officially proposed a third round of negotiations with Russia amid speculation in the Ukrainian and Russian informational spaces. Russian officials continue to feign interest in good-faith negotiations, despite failing to propose or agree to a third round of negotiations.
Ukrainian forces recently advanced in northern Sumy Oblast. Russian forces recently advanced in northern Sumy Oblast and near Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, and Pokrovsk.
Concerning the War
July 21, 2025, 5:30 pm ET
Russian forces conducted a large-scale series of missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of July 20 to 21 that included over 400 drones as Russia continues to launch significantly larger strike packages in June and July 2025 than in January to May 2025. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces launched 426 Shahed-type strike drones and decoy drones from the directions of Bryansk and Oryol cities; Millerovo, Rostov Oblast; Shatalovo, Smolensk Oblast; and Primorsko-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar Krai.[1] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces also launched five Kh-46 Kinzhal aeroballistic missiles from the airspace over Tambov Oblast; four Kalibr cruise missiles from the Black Sea; one Iskander-K cruise missile from Millerovo; and 14 Kh-101 cruise missiles from the airspace over Saratov Oblast. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces shot down and suppressed 200 Shahed-type drones and 203 decoy drones that Ukrainian air defense fire and electronic warfare (EW) downed all the missiles. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that 23 strike drones hit three locations and that drone debris fell in 12 locations. Ukrainian officials reported that Russian strikes damaged civilian and critical infrastructure in Ivano-Frankivsk, Kyiv, and Kharkiv oblasts.[2] Kyiv City Military Administration Head Timur Tkachenko reported that the Russian strike damaged the entrance to a metro station in the city.[3] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that the Russian strikes injured 15 civilians and killed two.[4] Russia rarely launched over 200 drones per night between January and May 2025, and an overnight strike package consisting of over 400 drones — even if far below Russia's latest record high of 728 drones in one strike package — demonstrates the dramatic shift in Russia's ability to repeatedly launch larger-scale drone strikes in recent weeks since May 2025.
Ukraine's Western partners pledged additional military and financial assistance to Ukraine during a virtual meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (the Ramstein format) on July 21. Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal announced that Germany will transfer five Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine in the near future and that Germany will also send 200,000 Gepard shells to Ukraine.[5] German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius also confirmed that Germany will send five Patriot air defense systems and necessary interceptors to Ukraine.[6] Shmyhal stated that Canada will contribute an unspecified amount toward financing Ukraine's defense industrial base (DIB) via the "Danish model" (in which Ukraine's partners buy Ukrainian-manufactured weapons for the Ukrainian military) and allocated 20 million CAD ($14.6 million) to Ukrainian tank maintenance. Shmyhal stated that the Netherlands allocated 200 million euros (roughly $234 million) to fund Ukrainian production of interceptor drones to counter Russian Shahed-type drones and 125 million euros (roughly $146 million) for F-16 fighter jet maintenance. Shmyhal stated that Norway also allocated one billion euros (roughly $1.67 billion) to fund Ukrainian drone purchases in 2025, including 400 million euros (roughly $468 million) specifically to purchase drones from Ukraine's DIB.
British Defense Secretary John Healey announced during the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting on July 21 a "50-day drive" to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and help push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table.[7] Healey noted that the group needs to seize on US President Donald Trump's threat to impose "severe" 100 percent secondary tariffs on Russia's trade partners if there is no peace settlement to end Russia's war in Ukraine within 50 days from July 14.[8] ISW has consistently assessed that only significant Russian battlefield setbacks, enabled by timely and sufficient Western military assistance to Ukrainian forces, will force Putin to reconsider Russia's ability to militarily defeat Ukraine and bring him to the negotiating table.[9] Such setbacks will not happen in a matter of weeks and will likely require several months or campaign seasons, assuming that the West commits to properly equipping and aiding Ukrainian forces to the point that Ukraine could successfully conduct such operations.
Ukrainian officials discussed Ukraine's increasing defense industrial capacity amid ongoing European aid announcements. Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal stated that Ukraine's defense industrial base (DIB) can accommodate an additional $6 billion in investments and that Ukraine could use these funds to produce more first-person view (FPV) and interceptor drones and long-range weapons.[10] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that Ukraine intends to increase domestic defense production over the next six months.[11] Ukrainian Defense Procurement Agency Head Arzen Zhumadilov told Ukrainian television channel Kanal 24 that Ukraine has contracted with three companies, including one Ukrainian and one American company, to produce interceptor drones to counter Russian Shahed-type drones.[12] Zhumadilov stated that Ukraine's DIB currently has the capacity to produce eight to 10 million FPV drones per year but that the Ukrainian government will only be able to fund the procurement of four to 4.5 million drones in 2025 due to budgetary constraints.
Key Takeaways
Russian forces conducted a large-scale series of missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of July 20 to 21 that included over 400 drones as Russia continues to launch significantly larger strike packages in June and July 2025 than in January to May 2025.
Ukraine's Western partners pledged additional military and financial assistance to Ukraine during a virtual meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (the Ramstein format) on July 21.
British Defense Secretary John Healey announced during the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting on July 21 a "50-day drive" to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and help push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table.
Ukrainian officials discussed Ukraine's increasing defense industrial capacity amid ongoing European aid announcements.
Ukraine officially proposed a third round of negotiations with Russia amid speculation in the Ukrainian and Russian informational spaces. Russian officials continue to feign interest in good-faith negotiations, despite failing to propose or agree to a third round of negotiations.
Ukrainian forces recently advanced in northern Sumy Oblast. Russian forces recently advanced in northern Sumy Oblast and near Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, and Pokrovsk.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:13 am to cypher
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
SBU chief Vasyl Maliuk met with G7 ambassadors, defending recent actions against anti-corruption bodies NABU and SAPO by stating the agency will continue rooting out Russian agents in all Ukrainian state bodies. “No institution is exempt,” he said, adding that NABU must be cleansed of hostile influence and that solid evidence has been gathered against suspected staff.
quote:
The court has chosen a preventive measure for a NABU employee suspected of passing confidential information to Russian special services. He will remain in custody
Firstly, thanks cypher for the input.
TLDR: Put away your fainting couches, both the NABU and SBU are fine and maintaining their duties. Just a little housecleaning. Ok, a lot of housecleaning...
War and Peace version:
Obviously we all saw what was happening yesterday with this vote in the Ukrainian Parliament. I was intially surprised at the scope of reporting that both the NABU and SAPO were being 'sidelined' and also at the lack of communication from Kyiv. So I decided to wait and see as this issue clearly has a lot of background that I didn't know.
With today's news there is better clarity as to what's going on. The lack of communication can't be glossed over however. Even if they needed to pass these bills quickly for security reasons, they should have had prepared statements to issue to the media to get in front of this story. They didn't and here we are.
As to the bill itself, the two schools of thought are:
a.) it's a massive cover-up of organic Ukrainian corruption; or
b.) the FSB has infiltrated both the NABU and SAPO to an extent that drastic intervention had to take place.
Both choices ask us to accept a lot of information without much basis. So let's look at secondary sources of input - what is not there as well as what is.
To observers in the West, the biggest issue outside of the war are the long term accusations of Ukrainain corruption. This is the main reason the Ukrainians are predominantly getting in-kind weapons support rather than bales of cash. Non-military support is supplied through Western agencies that are very sensitive to accusations of using donations in unintended ways. (Remember the United Way? What ever happened to them anyway, they used to be a thing...) Therefore they submit all their work to established outside auditors.
Kyiv knows this and has worked very hard at fighting corruption and being transparent about investigations and arrests. However, these investigations and arrests can always lead to suspicions about what is not being investigated. Therefore the outside audit trail of Western support, both in-kind and not, has to be the focus on trying to answer our questions about this issue.
Even the bales of cash that are going to Kyiv - the funding from the Russian overseas investment program (Thanks Vlad!) - are stringently audited by both the EU and the holding companies managing the funds. Because they're legally and financially responsible if anything goes missing.
So that's what we should keep in view in understanding what's going on here. Don't take the Ukrainian's word on anything, just watch the non-Ukrainian auditors who will have to pay for any theft.
We should also keep an eye out for further arrests and the corresponding court cases, but that would be secondary to the little men with pocket protectors and spread sheets. They're the first line of defense against corruption and will let everyone know if the numbers don't line up on both sides of the page.
Finally, Kyiv needs to do a much better job of communicating. They seem to be talking to NATO, the G-7 countries and other governments, but not to those of us on the ground. Yesterday's protests demonstrated the results of poor communication on all levels, so Kyiv has work to be done on this issue. Always remember, it sin't what you say as much as it is how you say it. And keeping anyone out of the loop is never justified. If it needs to remain confidential, just tell us that. It seems simple but again, we don't live next door to Russians every day.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 8:37 am
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:24 am to Coeur du Tigre
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:29 am to Coeur du Tigre
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Ukrainian SBU or jilted secretary? In either case, no one will be parking near Petrov from now on.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:46 am to Coeur du Tigre
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. More background on the NABU from establishment through significant cases.
quote:
Establishment of NABU
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) was established on October 14, 2014, following the adoption of the Law “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine” by the Verkhovna Rada.
This was driven by demands from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Commission to combat high-level corruption, a key condition for Ukraine’s EU visa liberalization and financial support.
NABU began operations in 2015, designed as an independent body to investigate and expose corruption among senior officials.
quote:
Achievements Overview NABU has a strong track record in uncovering corruption:
2017: Investigated Oleg Bakhmatyuk over a loan scandal and targeted Petro Poroshenko’s associates in defense sector thefts.
2022: Exposed a EUR 22 million bribery attempt involving a former lawmaker and Dnipro’s mayor, with 187 individuals charged.
2023: Uncovered corruption involving 21 senior officials, 39 state enterprise heads, 16 judges, and 11 MPs, with an economic impact of UAH 4.7 billion (~USD 125 million).
2024: Launched 658 cases, identified UAH 26 billion (USD 700 million) in losses, reimbursed UAH 823 million (USD 22 million), and seized UAH 6.8 billion in assets. Notable cases targeted defense, energy, and customs sectors.
These efforts highlight NABU’s role in tackling high-profile corruption, recovering significant funds, and securing convictions.
quote:
In June 2025, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Unity Oleksiy Chernyshov was named a suspect in a major corruption case by NABU and SAPO. He is accused of facilitating a land undervaluation scheme in Kyiv that allegedly cost the state over ?1 billion (approx. USD 24 million), receiving discounted apartments in return. While Chernyshov was on an official trip abroad when the charges surfaced, he returned to Ukraine and was later released on a ?120 million (USD 2.9 million) bail. Despite the serious allegations and detention of two former aides, the court allowed him to remain in office under certain restrictions. Chernyshov denies wrongdoing and has pledged to cooperate with the investigation.
quote:
Today’s Voting (July 22, 2025) On July 22, 2025, the Verkhovna Rada passed Bill ?12414, which subordinates NABU and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) to the Prosecutor General’s Office, granting powers to direct investigations, reassign cases, and close probes.
The vote saw: - 263 in favor - 13 against - 13 abstaining This followed SBU searches on July 21, 2025, targeting NABU officials, with accusations of Russian agents among them, including one official suspected of spying.
The bill, expedited through an unusual process, awaits President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s signature or veto. [Zelenskyy has signed it.] Protests started in Kyiv and other major cities, accusing the government of undermining anti-corruption efforts.
quote:
Rumors About Zelenskyy’s Acceptance President Zelenskyy has not yet signed Bill ?12414, [again, he did sign it] but rumors and unconfirmed reports suggest he may have already approved it. According to Member of Parliament Yaroslav Zheleznyak, the president has signed the bill, which would effectively dismantle NABU and SAPO’s independence. In the best-case scenario, Zelenskyy might refrain from signing to maintain a positive image, distancing himself from the decision. However, it’s difficult to believe he was unaware of the bill’s progression from the outset.
quote:
Conclusion Ukraine’s robust democratic civil society has a history of fighting corruption, as evidenced by its success during the 2013-2014 Maidan uprising. However, Ukrainian civil society is currently focused on Ukraine's survival—supporting the fight against Russia through military service or aiding soldiers. The protests against Bill ?12414, the first significant anti-government demonstrations since the full-scale invasion began, underscore public opposition to undermining anti-corruption efforts. While NABU may not have been perfect, its potential liquidation is undoubtedly a negative development. I hope President Zelenskyy and his government will heed the voices of Ukrainians before it’s too late.
Puts a lot of power into the hands of the Prosecutor General but there may be more changes forthcoming. Whatever we want to believe, Kyiv will absolutely do what the EU wants them to do and keep in constant communication with Brussels.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:05 am to Lee B
quote:
well... I'll bite my tongue here
You know exactly what I'm drawing a parallel to...
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:16 am to Coeur du Tigre
quote:
Yesterday's protests demonstrated the results of poor communication on all levels, so Kyiv has work to be done on this issue. Always remember, it sin't what you say as much as it is how you say it.
Very fair analysis
Its a major point that if we do want the best for Ukraine then just like the Ukrainian people we should be concerned about this collapsing of government oversight.
I've drawn the parallel to Trump and the Justice Department.
If Ukraine continued to hold elections of their legislature continued to be elected and had robust investigation tools of their own, then this would be a minor concern, but they haven't had any elections since 2019 and won't have any soon.
At the very least this new law should be watched with concern.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 6:18 am
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:27 am to Coeur du Tigre
Speaking of Russia... here it is, out in the open. It's now official Kremlin policy:
Nationalizing companies and capital assets is one thing, going after the oligarch's highly liquid bank accounts is another. What next? Warrants for seizure issued to the Russian-owned banks in Cyprus?
Everyone knows this is coming straight from Putin, but in any case, no one is parking next to deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Nikolai Arefyev. Just sayin'.
LINK
quote:
The Deputy of the Duma proposed to nationalize the assets of the oligarchs to fill the budget.
quote:
The wave of nationalization of private enterprises, which started in Russia shortly after the invasion of Ukraine, should be expanded to the assets of the country’s richest billionaires. This point of view was expressed by the deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Nikolai Arefyev.
“We have a lot of reserves that can be used in a difficult moment,” he said. According to Arefyev, the oligarchs over the past year alone “have accumulated $ 25 billion.”
“If you nationalize the sources of income used by the oligarchic elite, this money will be enough to solve economic problems,” he said. [Uh, no. But a nice thought.]
According to Forbes, as of March 2025, there were 146 billionaires in Russia. Over the year, they became more by 21 people, and their total fortune increased by $ 48 billion. Its total size - $ 625.5 billion - almost equaled the gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Central Bank, which at the time of Forbes' assessment amounted to $ 62.35 billion. [That Forbes list is going to get a lot of play. ]
So far, only one of the Russian billionaires has lost assets as a result of nationalization. This is Konstantin Strukov (78th in the Forbes list with a fortune of $ 1.9 billion) of the state-owned mining holding Yuzhuralzoloto was confiscated. [And Strukov is still under arrest.]
Also under the gun of the security forces was Vadim Moshkovich, the founder of the largest agricultural holding Rusagro in Russia, with a fortune of 2.9 billion, according to Forbes. [Yeah, they're picking off the small fry first.]
In total, for three years of the war, the Russian authorities nationalized factories and enterprises for 3.9 trillion rubles - an amount comparable to the liquid part of the National Welfare Fund (4.1 trillion rubles) and an equal third of the country's military budget. [Comparable to the liquid part, but not liquid.]
The rate of seizure of assets in Russia accelerated at the beginning of this year, when the state through the court nationalized the grain trader “Native Fields”, Domodedovo airport, the largest owner of warehouse assets Raven Russia in the Russian Federation, the producer of lead and zinc “MMC Daulpolimetall” and the oilfield services company “Borets”. Part of the nationalized enterprises are already sold to new owners who, within the framework of transactions, replenish the federal budget: last year it received 132 billion rubles from such re-privatization.
Nationalizing companies and capital assets is one thing, going after the oligarch's highly liquid bank accounts is another. What next? Warrants for seizure issued to the Russian-owned banks in Cyprus?
Everyone knows this is coming straight from Putin, but in any case, no one is parking next to deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Nikolai Arefyev. Just sayin'.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 8:06 am
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:58 am to cypher
Air defense downs 27 out of 71 Russian drones overnight
23.07.2025 10:09
Ukraine's air defense forces shot down or jammed 27 out of 71 Russian drones launched overnight, while another 18 drones disappeared from the radar.
The Ukrainian Air Force Command announced this on Facebook, according to Ukrinform.
On the night of July 22-23 (starting from 20:00 on July 22), the enemy launched 71 Shahed strike drones and various types of decoy drones from Kursk, Millerovo, and Primorsko-Akhtarsk in Russia, as well as Chauda in temporarily occupied Crimea.
The Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy, Kharkiv, and Cherkasy regions were targeted in the attack.
As of 09:00, preliminary data indicates that 27 enemy drones were shot down or jammed by air defense systems in the northern, eastern, and central parts of the country.
An additional 18 drones were lost from radar or suppressed by electronic warfare systems.
The Air Force recorded 26 confirmed drone impacts across 14 locations, and debris from downed drones fell in five locations.
Ukrinform
23.07.2025 10:09
Ukraine's air defense forces shot down or jammed 27 out of 71 Russian drones launched overnight, while another 18 drones disappeared from the radar.
The Ukrainian Air Force Command announced this on Facebook, according to Ukrinform.
On the night of July 22-23 (starting from 20:00 on July 22), the enemy launched 71 Shahed strike drones and various types of decoy drones from Kursk, Millerovo, and Primorsko-Akhtarsk in Russia, as well as Chauda in temporarily occupied Crimea.
The Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy, Kharkiv, and Cherkasy regions were targeted in the attack.
As of 09:00, preliminary data indicates that 27 enemy drones were shot down or jammed by air defense systems in the northern, eastern, and central parts of the country.
An additional 18 drones were lost from radar or suppressed by electronic warfare systems.
The Air Force recorded 26 confirmed drone impacts across 14 locations, and debris from downed drones fell in five locations.
Ukrinform
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:59 am to Narax
Cute dig at Trump.
Trump is using the DOJ in the exact manner it should be used, to uncover and root out a coup by a former president using IC to do the dirty work.
Ukraine on the other hand sees they cant win, and is proceeding to remove any discovery to their wrongdoing, just as the previous administration in the US tried to do, which is no doubt where they got the idea.
You can make all the excuses you want, but trying to make it a case for rooting out Russian spies versus covering up obvious theft is ludicrous.
And "putting it in the hands" of their lead prosecutor, "well SOB they fired him" comes to mind.
Trump is using the DOJ in the exact manner it should be used, to uncover and root out a coup by a former president using IC to do the dirty work.
Ukraine on the other hand sees they cant win, and is proceeding to remove any discovery to their wrongdoing, just as the previous administration in the US tried to do, which is no doubt where they got the idea.
You can make all the excuses you want, but trying to make it a case for rooting out Russian spies versus covering up obvious theft is ludicrous.
And "putting it in the hands" of their lead prosecutor, "well SOB they fired him" comes to mind.
Popular
Back to top


2



