- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest from O'Keefe on the royal family
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Yeah, you're right. We should just stop reporting child rape by influential people. It's not worth trying to help kids. I'll let the kids know they're on their own
Who reported anything??? NO charges will come from this. I rewatched it again to see what y'all saw.
This comes across as a drunken man past his prime trying to impress a young female honeypot (ironic) undercover reporter. He even leers at some woman who walks between him and the camera. He offered ZERO specifics that he saw himself. He referenced a large villa that he rented for Andrew (and himself and others?) in the South of France, but didn't say anything about what went on there.
He didn't even say how he learned that Andrew was "lying." Was it from newspaper articles or from first hand observation or an admission by Prince Andrew? From what Bryan says, he was boinking Andrew's wife. I seriously doubt he was close enough to Andrew to observe him having sex with underage girls. As for confession, that would have happened at their strategy session...which obviously didn't happen then.
Again, appreciate the effort by O'Keefe, but this story will have ZERO consequences other than to ruin Bryan. The way O'Keefe built this up was WAY too much.
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 5:30 pm
3
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:30 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Who reported anything??? NO charges will come from this. I rewatched it again to see what y'all saw.
This comes across as a drunken man past his prime trying to impress a young female honeypot (ironic) undercover reporter. He even leers at some woman who walks between him and the camera. He offered ZERO specifics that he saw himself. He referenced a large villa that he rented for Andrew (and himself and others?) in the South of France, but didn't say anything about what went on there.
He didn't even say how he learned that Andrew was "lying." Was it from newspaper articles or from first hand observation or an admission by Prince Andrew. From what Bryan says, he was boinking Andrew's wife. I seriously doubt he was close enough to Andrew to observe him having sex with underage girls. As for confession, that would have happened at their strategy session...which obviously didn't happen then.
Again, appreciate the effort by O'Keefe, but this story will have ZERO consequences other than to ruin Bryan. The way O'Keefe built this up was WAY too much.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
y'all have built it up to be
who is "y'all"? It's totally hilarious and so SFP to think you know how "wide spread" this is
quote:Well I certainly don't know the 14th amendment like you do. If only I could insert words and meaning like you do from your extraordinary legal genius
it will make people like you
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:31 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
I thought he was going to spring something we didn’t know.
We all know. Up until now all we had as evidence was stuff being kept secret and a picture of him and her... clothes on.
Now we have a video of major player saying Prince Andrew had sex with her.
PooPoo it all yall want but that is the first direct evidence of Andrews guilt.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:31 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:Maybe, hopefully, elimination of 2 tiered justice?
What happens if WE don't drop it?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:31 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
who is "y'all"?
People like you.
quote:
It's totally hilarious and so SFP to think you know how "wide spread" this is
I don't know, but we do have a chunk of evidence from the case itself and then observational evidence about how the government sees the case to assess.
quote:
Well I certainly don't know the 14th amendment like you do. If only I could insert words and meaning like you do from your extraordinary legal genius
Your melt over people not promoting your conspiracy theory is reaching epic levels, friend.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:32 pm to omegaman66
quote:
but that is the first direct evidence of Andrews guilt.
This is not direct evidence
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:33 pm to SallysHuman
quote:Then why are you downplaying the story? O'Keefe is doing something no one else has done and it's supposed to put pressure on those in charge to eliminate injustice. Just what part of this are you opposed to?
My point was that nothing will come of it.
I thought I made that clear, but I typed slower this time so maybe that'll help
I still don't understand your point. Maybe you're right. So what? Are journalists just supposed to stop reporting? My word
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes it is evidence. It isn't obviously enough to convict anyone, much less a prince, but it damn sure is evidence.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:35 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
what way? He got video admission of John Bryan saying a royal was involved with Epstein victims. How is that damaging to O'Keefe?
Its not. That poster is just full of fricking shite and probably a bot.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:36 pm to Night Vision
This isn't great for the royal family.
Harry is currently being as big of a bitch as his wife. Watch Megyn Kelly. Markle, Harry's wretched wife is already shopping a publishers interest for her divorce.
Strip Harry and Meg of their royal Sussex names and Meg will divorce Harry with quickness. He will lose his kids. Someone tell the
whipped dumbass to take the kids and go to the UK while he can.
Anyway, back to the thread...Sorry. Is this the guy that was sucking Fergies toes by the pool?
Harry is currently being as big of a bitch as his wife. Watch Megyn Kelly. Markle, Harry's wretched wife is already shopping a publishers interest for her divorce.
Strip Harry and Meg of their royal Sussex names and Meg will divorce Harry with quickness. He will lose his kids. Someone tell the
whipped dumbass to take the kids and go to the UK while he can. Anyway, back to the thread...Sorry. Is this the guy that was sucking Fergies toes by the pool?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:37 pm to somethingdifferent
Okeefe reported news already widely known... about an individual who will never face punishment.
Maybe I'm just Over the "we got'em now" shite. I'd be first row of a justice parade if anything ever actually happened to these depraved cvunts, I just don't see it happening.
Maybe I'm just Over the "we got'em now" shite. I'd be first row of a justice parade if anything ever actually happened to these depraved cvunts, I just don't see it happening.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:38 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Yes it is evidence.
You said it was direct evidence. I said it was not.
This would almost assuredly not be allowed in trial, even.
On the other hand, the government has had access to sworn testimony from the victim relating to the actual abuse for 10+ years. We knew this existed to judge Andrew and no criminal chargers were filed.
Why do you think this stretch of hearsay matters, given the above?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Y'all have this weird obsession with pretending
The fricking pot calling the kettle a dindu.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:39 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
The fricking pot calling the kettle a dindu.
No
My adherence to reality angers the conspiracy bros and MAGAtards the most, actually.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but that is the first direct evidence of Andrews guilt. This is not direct evidence
Yeah, and I guess he’s just going to overlook what the girl herself has said.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I appreciate the effort, but this didn't move the needle AT ALL. Andrew's BBC interview and the subsequent discipline already convinced most people that Andrew had sex with underage women. Did you have any doubts of that BEFORE this interview?
I have doubts that he ever paid for his crimes, and that if he never does then we have a two tiered justice system.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Where is the video like this one from 10 years ago
It is when this already was a story....10 years ago
Add this to the list of stuff you will run from, like the 14th amendment conversation
quote:And now the thread becomes an SFP classic. Who has a video of a close confidant making this type of admission?
You can't "Break" a story that's a decade old
quote:Now you're honestly acting like "I BELIEVE HER"
You think intoxicated hearsay somehow has more impact on LEO than direct testimony by the victim (there is actual testimony from more than one)?
You are the worst, WORST person on this board. You have to be an AI programmed to be completely and utterly obnoxious quote:How do you know 14th admendment genius?
This story has nothing to do with the government
quote:How do you know it's propaganda, genius?
emotional propaganda
quote:
It's only going to be promoted by emotional types and idiots
You have absolutely no self awarenessPosted on 5/7/25 at 5:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My adherence to reality
Loosely tethered.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:49 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Where is the video like this one from 10 years ago
This video is weaker evidence than what we had 10 years ago?
Why would this weak stuff matter now when they already had stronger evidence?
quote:
Now you're honestly acting like "I BELIEVE HER"
Where have I ever doubted the accusations against Prince Andrew?
quote:
How do you know 14th admendment genius?
Your random melt is reaching historic levels.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News