- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:42 pm to L.A.
Obama and Biden didn’t tweet about Epstein and promise to release the files Trump did. He spent the first 6 months saying it was coming as did Bondi and Patel. The poof it was just a democratic hoax. Then the Dems smelled blood, 4 other republicans voted with them to force Trump to release them. Now for anyone paying attention Bondi and Patel have lied straight in to the camera. Who are they covering for? Why did this board who couldn’t wait to the Epstein files to be released all of the sudden started parroting the talking points Trump and his team put out. What’s going on right now should outrage every American.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:44 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
Obama and Biden didn’t tweet about Epstein and promise to release the files Trump did
So because they didn’t tweet about it they get a pass? Thats a very strange position to take.
:
quote:
force Trump to release them.
quote:
What’s going on right now should outrage every American.
It should outraged every American for the last 12 years. Yet you give Biden and Obama a pass because they didn’t tweet about it. Disgusting.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:49 pm to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
frick you, you cannot answer why the Democrats did not get Trump when they had all of the files for years.
Instead they pursued all sort so made up bullshite.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I don’t want an editorialized version. I want to see the actual documents. You have seen the actual documents, right? You’re not just believing what someone tells you, right? I bet you can’t produce the actual documents
The actual documents were shown on the clip. But if you send me your name and address I’ll gladly send you what you just saw without the editorial. Or better yet, you can search for yourself and save yourself the embarrassment of being wrong again and again and again.
There’s a whole world of information outside your one think rabbit hole, I suggest you seek it out then show us how we are wrong. But you won’t.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:52 pm to BBONDS25
He signed the bill because of the vote, he had hrs long meetings with MTG and Mace and when he couldn’t stop them from siding with the Dems he was forced to sign it. Have you asked yourself why didn’t every person and congress sign it. Biden is the president neither is Obama. So why should I care what they did? This boards “whataboutism” is ridiculous
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:01 pm to BBONDS25
quote:This is pretty well known. It's only allegations but the standard for documents you guys were discussing was only "mentions that paint him in a bad light," and this one certainly meets that bar. Although, again, these are unproven allegations.
I don’t want an editorialized version. I want to see the actual documents. You have seen the actual documents, right? You’re not just believing what someone tells you, right?
I bet you can’t produce the actual documents
LINK
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:07 pm to L.A.
quote:
It is ironic that the only President who has released any of the Epstein files is the one being accused of a cover-up
Indeed. Now - release ALL OF THEM.
What's the fricking hold up?! Take the whole fricking hard drive and put it on the web. Pull the sheet off and let the chips fall where they may.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:15 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'd bet that Batman shows up in the Joker's emails a lot too, but that doesn't mean they were in league with each other.
Terrible analogy… both the Batman and Joker are wanted vigilantes according to the Gotham Police…
quote:
Donald Trump was Epstein's archnemesis
You think this is a good thing…
quote:
determined to take Epstein down.
What does this even mean???… take him down how??? They were friends who had a falling out… if the falling out was behind Epstein dealings with minors Trump even more of a coward than i thought… the reason being he has never been shy going in front of a camera an insulting people for perceived slights … why in the hell have we never heard a rant of him dressing down Epstein for being a pedo… that’s the whole thing in a nutshell… we’ve heard Trump completely destroy people publicly… yet here he knows he can’t because the question comes up “When did you know??”
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:18 pm to northshorebamaman
The bar was credible allegations. The ones you’ve pointed at are definitively not credible, having been evaluated and found to be baseless. If there was even a smidgen of a possibility they were true CNN and MSDNC would be 24/7 with a smear campaign, aided by DemCommie simps in Congress. That’s how we objectively know Trump is clean.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:26 pm to Clark14
quote:
trump is mentioned more times than Harry Potter was in all of his books, just because you refuse to believe it doesn’t make your claim true. As far as completely clean goes, his name should be because it is being scrubbed from everything.
You have had the chance to prove this once already to and you ran away. Still waiting on those bombshells.
The programmed drones got their commands today and are regurgitating as hard as their commanders wanted.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 3:33 pm to TBoy
quote:
suggesting that only Democrats would be implicated. Do not notice the truth.
Speaking of that......... noticeably absent from all of the leftist Epstien rants is why the current house minority leader was inviting Epstein to campaign functions and begging the already convicted Epstein for money. Aaaaaaaawwwwwwwffffuul quiet about that. But that's not in your programming. So you don't worry.
Also... the Dem congresswoman that was actively cooperating and conversing with Epstien during a comittee hearing? Aaaaaawwwwwfffful quiet about that.
All you propaganda slave drones have forgotten about all the pics of Clinton at the island, the painting of Clinton that Epstein had as a joke between them, and have conveniently dropped all mentions of Bill Gates being all in the files.
And since you are soooooooooooooooo really and actually concerned about minors... where are your congratulations to the DHS in Minnesota for locating all of those minors? Those not important for some reason?
Now be sure to downvote before you scram.
Just under three more years boys. Hand your sharp objects to a neighbor for safe keeping and get those SSRIs refilled.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 2/13/26 at 4:01 pm to ReauxlTide222
The point is that many here would still support him willingly even if he was guilty of anything Jeffrey.
Nothing new, just in knowing that he is a terrible person and don't care
Nothing new, just in knowing that he is a terrible person and don't care
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:04 pm to lepdagod
quote:
take him down how???
Did you miss the part where he dropped a dime on Epstein in 2006 to the FBI?
If that part of the story is news to you, you aren't tall enough for this ride, but enjoy the spinning teacups.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:24 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
he was forced to sign it.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:25 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
This is pretty well known. It's only allegations but the standard for documents you guys were discussing was only "mentions that paint him in a bad light," and this one certainly meets that bar. Although, again, these are unproven allegations.
Thanks for posting. I wanted to read them to see how outlandish or verifiable they are.
Was that a sealed case prior to the document release? Do you know the outcome of the case?
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:30 pm to Clark14
quote:
save yourself the embarrassment of being wrong again and again and again.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:33 pm to BBONDS25
Why are the Dems not going after the people that are named? Why is the Media not? It’s a very bad look. Where is Massie? There are lots of names just not Trumps. Guess it’s ok for other people. No big deal.
Popular
Back to top


0






