- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Jury Deliberation Day 3: Reported Jury is done deliberating for the day
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:48 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:48 pm to BuckyCheese
These dudes would get knuckle checked hard at Sonic.
0
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:49 pm to IT_Dawg
The jury foreman is definitely a karen and pro-pedophile.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:51 pm to jclem11
quote:
What's your point, Matlock?
My point is you’re in here posting like you’re chanting at a rally or something. I just wanted to make sure that you understood that neither the jury, nor anyone in the courtroom could hear or read what you are saying. It was not immediately clear that you knew that.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:51 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
My point is you’re in here posting like you’re chanting at a rally or something. I just wanted to make sure that you understood that neither the jury, nor anyone in the courtroom could hear or read what you are saying. It was not immediately clear that you knew that.
Strange flex.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:52 pm to Rollo
quote:
Well, they became aware of Fatlock's explanation that morning, as well as the existence of the two video compression apps on Fatlock's computer. They also just found out that the software use to enhance the video was not for use in court, and was for forensic purposes only.
I'll roll with you on this: in the event the video motion for mistrial comes front and center, and the judge asks for some oral argument from each side, if there's some additional information that has come to light since the motion was made, then yes, I would suspect that it's justifiable for defense counsel to add that to the mix. That's a bingo.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:53 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
My point is you’re in here posting like you’re chanting at a rally or something. I just wanted to make sure that you understood that neither the jury, nor anyone in the courtroom could hear or read what you are saying. It was not immediately clear that you knew that.
Oh look. It's the fricking pussy that would convict Rittenhouse to avoid being doxxed.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:56 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
My point is you’re in here posting like you’re chanting at a rally or something. I just wanted to make sure that you understood that neither the jury, nor anyone in the courtroom could hear or read what you are saying. It was not immediately clear that you knew that.
You sho is angry. No-one is reading your posts either, Einstein.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:56 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
My point is you’re in here posting like you’re chanting at a rally or something. I just wanted to make sure that you understood that neither the jury, nor anyone in the courtroom could hear or read what you are saying. It was not immediately clear that you knew that.
A lot of judges have posted here over the years. Why not this one?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:56 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Strange flex.
He is an idiot and only in here to stir shite up.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:57 pm to davyjones
quote:
Well, they became aware of Fatlock's explanation that morning, as well as the existence of the two video compression apps on Fatlock's computer. They also just found out that the software use to enhance the video was not for use in court, and was for forensic purposes only.
Pretty sure the video programs were found by internet sleuths watching the streaming coverage right?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 12:59 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Oh look. It's the fricking pussy that would convict Rittenhouse to avoid being doxxed.
Yea, I can see where that has you a little rustled. Especially now that it might actually happen. If you had kids, you might understand.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:00 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
They also just found out that the software use to enhance the video was not for use in court,
And that company who sells to tons of experts, came back and had to say they didn’t really mean that when they put it in their manual lol
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:01 pm to RealDawg
It is absolutely amazing that this is still going on. 2.5 days of deliberation now... Has to be a hung jury at this point.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:02 pm to cajunangelle
It’s a simple question but I ask bc it’s something MSNBC would say, but is following the jury bus illegal. It sounds fricked up but is it actually breaking a law. The judge can allow anyone in his courtroom I assume. I ask bc I assume this type of behavior will only become more and more common
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:03 pm to Lsut81
quote:
It is absolutely amazing that this is taking so long. 2.5 days of deliberation now...
it was 2.5 weeks of trial and 40 pages of instruction. There is a lot of evidence to compare to the law and if there is 1 holdout, you have to continue to try and persuade them onto the side with 11....
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:04 pm to plazadweller
I have kids Capt Spaulding….Kyle should be not guilty.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:05 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
if there is 1 holdout,
Say it comes back as a hung jury - will we get to know what the vote was, like "11-1 for acquittal?"
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:05 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
Yea, I can see where that has you a little rustled. Especially now that it might actually happen. If you had kids, you might understand.
Like you care about your kids, as you teach them to capitulate to the brownshirts. What is one of your kids was KR?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:06 pm to plazadweller
quote:
It’s a simple question but I ask bc it’s something MSNBC would say, but is following the jury bus illegal. It sounds fricked up but is it actually breaking a law. The judge can allow anyone in his courtroom I assume. I ask bc I assume this type of behavior will only become more and more common
Most states have jury tampering statues. It would likely fall under that.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:07 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
Yea, I can see where that has you a little rustled. Especially now that it might actually happen. If you had kids, you might understand.
Page 18 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News