Started By
Message

re: Kyle Rittenhouse Jury Deliberation Day 3: Reported Jury is done deliberating for the day

Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

so looking at what the jurors asked for didn't settle the one or two holdouts?



Looking at the 5th question from the jury, it appears that the forewoman is a mask wearing karen that is an BLM activist.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:35 pm to
quote:


Yea, I can see where that has you a little rustled. Especially now that it might actually happen. If you had kids, you might understand.



Yeah you hold your head high as you throw a kid on the pyre in a witch hunt to save your sorry arse.

You are a coward
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
20015 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:37 pm to
More free lunches and dinners through Friday.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

He's a dem, but he's an old dem. I don't think he's a progressive loon as he hasn't really shown anything to suggest that.
You mean other than consistently admonishing the prosecutors in open court for multiple malfeasances and constitutional violations, but then still giving them a complete pass on it all, while also allowing them to submit damn near every piece of bullshite evidence they want and get away with spouting countless lies?

This forum and dozens of lawyers streaming, tweeting, and going on news shows have discussed ad nausea how this trial should have ended already as a mistrial with prejudice. But here we are. This judge hasn’t done a thing but allow the prosecution to continue unabated doing shady bullshite over and over with zero actual consequences. Even allowing the jury to see doctored video.

He’s going to let the jury verdict stand. If they find Kyle guilty, he’s not going to change it. He’s not going to declare a mistrial, much less one with prejudice.

These prosecutors aren’t even going to get a slap on the wrist when this is all done. The judge will even thank them for doing an excellent job.

Some of you are being incredibly naive. I hope the jury comes back not guilty. But if they don’t, the judge is going to put him behind bars and not give a second thought about it.
Posted by LSU Jax
Gator Country Hell
Member since Sep 2006
10687 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

What the frick did I just read

Goes back to this yesterday. He’s a total piece of shite.

LINK
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Looking at the 5th question from the jury, it appears that the forewoman is a mask wearing karen that is an BLM activist.



What was the 5th question?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:39 pm to
Drone video.

ETA: Did y'all see the request from the jury to see the video? The rekieta crew was analyzing the verbiage.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:41 pm
Posted by LSU Jax
Gator Country Hell
Member since Sep 2006
10687 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that you would vote to convict when you believed acquittal was appropriate because you were scared?

Yes that’s exactly what he said, in so many words, yesterday. See the link I jist posted above to Tuscaloosa. CaptSpaulding is a gutless piece of shite.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:41 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

What was the 5th question?


Posted by Jinks
Member since Apr 2018
610 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:43 pm to
Here is jury question #5



Notice the language. Looks like someone not on Kyle's side.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
20015 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:44 pm to
And what did rekieta have to say about it?
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:44 pm to
The description of what Mr. Rittenhouse does with the fire extinguisher is particularly striking.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Looks like someone not on Kyle's side.


That is what the crew was saying.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85111 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:44 pm to
What I don't understand is "request when ready"...

So whomever wrote this knew they would need this in order to prove/disprove something in advance.

It isn't that they are debating and one is hung up on something and they say "ok, lets look at the evidence".
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

it appears that the forewoman is a mask wearing karen that is an BLM activist.


Haven’t been able to keep up today. How was that determined? Thank you
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Notice the language. Looks like someone not on Kyle's side.



Yeah, I noted the wording as well.

Must be some idiots on the jury to vote an activist as the foreman. If that is the case it definitely isn't going to be an acquittal.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41331 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:46 pm to
No doubt in my mind there are some BLM Karen’s on the jury wanting to make convicting Kyle the high point in their life. Pieces of shite
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4953 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

But...he's right about jury intimidation working
sure, it works, that's why they do it

i've just never seen someone, let alone a man, so brazenly unashamed of having no dignity and outright bragging about quickly he'd fold

you can easily look across the aisle on the left and see the mushy testosterone-less piles of skin and hair and think "this is what's wrong with the country right now," but it's a much harder pill to swallow to read some crap like that and realize "we have a lot of work to do on our side as well".

and i'm just assuming he leans right simply because he keeps implying he has kids. then again, his severe affinity for children could just be because he's a progressive and attracted to children.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Must be some idiots on the jury to vote an activist as the foreman. If that is the case it definitely isn't going to be an acquittal.


If it was a nefarious activist, they would be doing everything they could to get on all the jurors' good side. And also not to give away their true thoughts.
Posted by Itismemc
LA
Member since Nov 2008
4794 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:49 pm to
Has anyone analyzed the 3rd bullet point, and what was written over
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram