- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kunta may not have been appointed to the SCOTUS legitimately
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:24 pm to thejuiceisloose
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:24 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
If you're THAT gullible...
Most "News" here is just gossip off of X. Sadly this isnt the only fake news posted on the front page here.
0
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:29 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Make Joe pick her out of a line up.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:29 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
What if she is SFP?
you just blew my mind
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:31 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Do you want Dems to stack the court? This is how you give them coverage to do it.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:33 pm to newmexicotiger
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:41 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
There isn't a single chance that her confirmation will be ruled to be unconstitutional. Stop amplifying nonsense like this.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:46 pm to BeehiveTiger
quote:
Ain’t no way Santa comes this early
Trump now knows what the MSM will be focusing on the next couple of weeks.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:47 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
the Trump cult loves setting themselves up for disappointment
Or it could be the cult of calling everything Trump does/Trump hate, is the real cult.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:49 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
And publicly announced her confirmation and spoke on her.
Some people are going to be really disappointed.
At least the NPCs signal their sheep-talk very loudly these days
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
SFP bait if I’ve ever seen any
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:53 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
A president can absolutely revoke any of his predecessor's EOs, such that they have no effect going forward. Arguably, Trump's little announcement might have that effect, though he MAY have to revoke each EO individually.
He cannot retroactively cancel the actions of his predecessor by just unilaterally declaring them invalid.
If he is serious about this silliness (which I doubt), it will go to SCOTUS, and they are NOT going to unseat one of their colleagues.
He cannot retroactively cancel the actions of his predecessor by just unilaterally declaring them invalid.
If he is serious about this silliness (which I doubt), it will go to SCOTUS, and they are NOT going to unseat one of their colleagues.
This post was edited on 11/28/25 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:54 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Remove her from the Supreme Court and allow her to pursue her life-long dream of becoming a biologist.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:54 pm to PsychTiger
quote:quote:I don’t know, their mind are pretty loose already.
The DEMOCRATS would litteraly loose their Minds
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:58 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
You guys keep going for the fantasy. Trump loves to tweak you people. You are so unbelievably gullible....like, beyond stupid.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You at least acknowledge that she's stupid, right? Hell, even Sotomayor has criticized her poorly written opinions.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:13 pm to KCT
quote:She is definitely the Court's weakest link.
You at least acknowledge that she's stupid, right? Hell, even Sotomayor has criticized her poorly written opinions.
This post was edited on 11/28/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:24 pm to beaux duke
Junta is but a slang term for a kunt which is undoubtedly true
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:47 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
president can absolutely revoke any of his predecessor's EOs, such that they have no effect going forward.
Judicial commissions aren’t executive orders subject to revocation. Otherwise the lifetime appointment of federal judges would be farcical. It would have already been done.
KJB isn’t getting kicked off the bench over the autopen.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:53 pm to Kjnstkmn
DEI hire?
There is not a single one of you with as impressive of credentials.
There is not a single one of you with as impressive of credentials.
quote:
Went to Harvard for college, graduated magna cum laude.
Harvard Law School, was one of the editors for Harvard Law Review, graduated cum laude.
Served as a judicial law clerk for U.S. District Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Private practice, then was an assistant special counsel to the United States Sentencing Commission, then was an assistant federal public defender. Then served as vice chair of the United States Sentencing Commission.
Then was a United States District Judge, and then as a Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Posted on 11/28/25 at 8:54 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just curious, would Trump need this Republican Congress to literally do anything about this? Because if so.. and I mean ANYTHING.. there's no way. Not even a question. They will not support anything about this in any way. Just letting you all know before you get your hopes up.
However, just remember. A Dem controlled congress impeaches Trump with their first order of biz.
However, just remember. A Dem controlled congress impeaches Trump with their first order of biz.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News