Justice Thomas urges U.S. Supreme Court to feel free to reverse precedents

the REEEEEEEEEEE will be off the charts over this

quote:

---

"When faced with a demonstrably erroneous precedent, my rule is simple: We should not follow it,"

---

Eta: I posted without making the comment.

To our constitutionalists: how much power would the feds lose if the commerce clause is severely weakened?

On a scale, how much power tips back to the states?

quote:

---

the task has also always been to get it right the first time,

---

They got it wrong the first time - demonstrably wrong - they made up a constitutional 'right' out of whole cloth. Because they yielded to political ideology rather than constitutional process. The constitution put that sort of decision in the hands of the Congress - not in the hands of 9 people.

quote:

---

close enough to right that they can work with it

---

They got it so wrong that it could not be 'worked with' - it could only be misused to produce even more pernicious maljustice. It was used as a lever to 'validate' infanticide - that is how WRONG they got it the first time - and any sane person with an ounce of integrity or intelligence got it right the first time - but were overruled by the radical elements on the SCOTUS -

the correct answer was - and always will be - Pass an AMENDMENT to the constitution if you want to carve our shite like this as FOREVER LEGAL.

quote:

---

The reason this is provocative is that

---

the radical ideology that produced this abortion of a judgement immediately began using it in direct opposition to its 'moral underpinning' of 'legal, safe, and rare' - especially the RARE part. They used it to wantonly murder millions of innocent babies - for the CONVENIENCE of the 'mothers,'

quote:

---

no one trusts Thomas. He’s a terrible justice who is also a loon.

---

One of the finest minds on the court. only souless radial ideologues don't like him - the same ones who piss on the constitution daily - the same ones who misuse the constitution as a weapon rathe then a shield.

That would be you = anti-American to the core

I hope his last act before retirement is to write the opinion that explains exactly why Roe v. Wade is erroneous.

quote:

---

Bandit just drug his nuts over your face and made you his prison wife.

---

LowTBoy probably likes the thought of this

quote:

---

how much power would the feds lose if the commerce clause is severely weakened?

---

All of it, just about

Scott was overturned properly by amendment.

However overturning precedent is precedent when Plessy was overturned by Brown.

Therefore Roe is fair game.

This whole stare decisis concept is the biggest misnomer in the history of the common law considering the Supreme Court’s overturned its precedents many times in its history Plessy v. Ferguson constituting the most consequential example. Moreover, the Louisiana Civil Code recognizes no such concept, it’s all about the judge’s interpretation of the law and Constitution and that’s how it should be “judgment.”

Justice Thomas is a legal hero of mine, cannot find a single opinion majority or dissent he’s joined that I disagree with in his 28 years of service, he’s remarkably consistent and will be missed when he leaves

LOL the fricking libtards on the Court and Kennedy comprised the Raich majority some “liberals” Scalia concurred on Necessary and Proper Clause grounds. Again, Thomas’ dissent right on the money.