- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Acquits the man who called for Trump’s assassination on BlueSky.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:22 pm to Patato Salad
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:22 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
Your response is disingenuous and overlooks the orignal point
My answer is disingenuous? You are the one claiming that there is no difference between a criminal and a victim. In the case of an execution the conviction is understood and goes without saying in any honest debate. Words have meanings. But you prove that you are incapable of honest debate. At some point, an intelligent person would have to ask why they are always on the side of the criminal and opposed to decency. But relax, no one will ever expect that from you.
1
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:32 pm to i am dan
quote:
If he called for the assassination of any POTUS, why do you need to know what he wrote? He broke the law correct?
It's not against the law to say such things.
It is against the law to take any kind of actions for such things. But you are free to have such an opinion all you want.
Being stupid isn't illegal.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:34 pm to 3down10
I was going to say, I would probably acquit, unless there was a very specific threat and the prosecution made the case it violated whatever law.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:53 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I know of a guy serving time for calling 911 drunk and saying he was going to take out Obama. Though when police arrested him he had illegal guns, 4 rifles and 7 pounds of weed
Dude was freaking crazy as shite. I think he got 8 years.
LINK
Dude was freaking crazy as shite. I think he got 8 years.
quote:
A New Orleans man has been arrested and charged with threatening to kill President Barack Obama.
In a court filing Monday, a Secret Service agent said 47-year-old John Turnpaugh dialed 911 early last Friday and told a police emergency dispatcher that he planned to kill the president and first lady Michelle Obama.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:57 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Of course they did. The judicial system is corrupt AF.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:18 pm to Azkiger
I’ll ask it again -
If someone had been tried in Alexandria for typing those same words online about your dear cult leader Obama and every word used in the trial was exactly the same as the words used in the cited case, do you honestly believe that an Arlington jury would have not only declared the defendant not guilty, but would’ve also unanimously acquitted the defendant?
Please, please, please tell me you’re not that fricking stupid. There is just no fricking way that someone could possibly be THAT F*CKING STUPID.
Hell, even a brain dead and brainwashed liberal who thinks Obama is their Messiah (like you) could be that f+cking stupid.
If someone had been tried in Alexandria for typing those same words online about your dear cult leader Obama and every word used in the trial was exactly the same as the words used in the cited case, do you honestly believe that an Arlington jury would have not only declared the defendant not guilty, but would’ve also unanimously acquitted the defendant?
Please, please, please tell me you’re not that fricking stupid. There is just no fricking way that someone could possibly be THAT F*CKING STUPID.
Hell, even a brain dead and brainwashed liberal who thinks Obama is their Messiah (like you) could be that f+cking stupid.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:42 pm to shinerfan
quote:
In the case of an execution the conviction is understood and goes without saying in any honest debate.
I am not talking about calling for an execution of someone guilty of a (presumably horrible) crime. That is an opinion about the severity of the sentence for the crime - which is not my question at all.
Is it OK to you to call for the execution of someone who has not been convicted or charged with a crime?
And, if so (for the third time) how is that distinguishable from the defendant's posts?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:44 pm to MMauler
No clue, the internal politics if Alexandria Virginia is not common sense.
Stop sperging out.
Stop sperging out.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:47 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
Is it OK to you to call for the execution of someone who has not been convicted or charged with a crime?
It wouldn't be an execution prior to conviction. It would be murder. Due process is understood with the use of the word "execution" rather than use of the word "murder". Of course you know that but silly word games are all you're capable of.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:47 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Well, Democrats have become a death cult so this isn't really surprising.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Jury Acquits the man who called for Trump’s assassination on BlueSky.
Contrast this with the sick old man that threatened Biden and got his door kicked in and was summarily executed in his home for his assassination threats.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:25 pm to Azkiger
quote:
No clue,
Yup. You are THAT F*CKING STUPID.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:47 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The guy was a crackpot running his mouth on the Internet, not a potential assassination conspiracist.
If you support this prosecution, is it safe to assume that you also support the British government prosecutions of Internet crackpots?
If you support this prosecution, is it safe to assume that you also support the British government prosecutions of Internet crackpots?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:51 pm to Patato Salad
quote:It isn’t.
people online (including here) call for people (who have not been convicted of crimes) to be executed, harmed, etc. - how is that different than the defendant's conduct?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:56 pm to MMauler
quote:Juries are generally stupid and emotional.
If someone had been tried in Alexandria for typing those same words online about your dear cult leader Obama and every word used in the trial was exactly the same as the words used in the cited case, do you honestly believe that an Arlington jury would have not only declared the defendant not guilty, but would’ve also unanimously acquitted the defendant?
Azkiger is conducting a rational analysis.
To answer your question directly, however, such a conviction would be unlikely. Even in the most-Blue venue, you would get enough Red (or otherwise rational) jurors to lock the jury and create a mistrial. You would probably need only one.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:53 pm to shinerfan
I didn’t ask you to define execution. I know what the term means. As I previously stated, I don’t disagree with your definition.
I asked you a simple question: whether *calling* for execution of an innocent person is any different than calling for murder, violence, etc. Apparently you either have a serious reading comprehension issue or you believe that no one could ever utter the words “he should be executed” about someone that hasn’t been convicted of a crime. The lengths you’re going to to avoid the question are remarkable.
I asked you a simple question: whether *calling* for execution of an innocent person is any different than calling for murder, violence, etc. Apparently you either have a serious reading comprehension issue or you believe that no one could ever utter the words “he should be executed” about someone that hasn’t been convicted of a crime. The lengths you’re going to to avoid the question are remarkable.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:59 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Same. I'd still need to see the comments, though.
Some were posted above and you have the internet.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:01 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
I didn’t ask you to define execution. I know what the term means. As I previously stated, I don’t disagree with your definition.
You obviously don't know what it means because you keep asking the same stupid question.
quote:
Apparently you either have a serious reading comprehension issue or you believe that no one could ever utter the words “he should be executed” about someone that hasn’t been convicted of a crime. The lengths you’re going to to avoid the question are remarkable
Maybe if I type slower you'll be able to follow this time. The use of the term "execution" clearly implies that due process has been followed. But I apologize for calling you disengenuous. You really are this stupid, aren't you?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:04 pm to MMauler
quote:
If someone had been tried in Alexandria for typing those same words online about your dear cult leader Obama and every word used in the trial was exactly the same as the words used in the cited case, do you honestly believe that an Arlington jury would have not only declared the defendant not guilty, but would’ve also unanimously acquitted the defendant?
the paranoia is off the charts
who knows what another jury would do? you're making up scenarios that don't exist and getting worked up about it
so emotional
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News