- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Thurston gets Loomered within 24 hours. UPDATE: husband deleting posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:21 am to TrueTiger
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:21 am to TrueTiger
The Judge's husband is deleting his posts now. 
Instantly making it worse.
Instantly making it worse.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
0
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:36 am to TrueTiger
quote:
the judge who just ruled that President Trump’s administration can’t arrest any more illegal aliens unless they have a warrant for their arrest,
Not entirely correct.
LINK
quote:
The injunction is in effect in the jurisdiction of California’s Eastern District, which spans the Central Valley from Redding to Bakersfield.
This is a limited TRO for the judge's district only, and not a nationwide one.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 6:37 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:36 am to TrueTiger
For as off the wall some of her takes are, this is an incredibly reasonable and fair doxxing or whatever term is appropriate
And it shows libs for just who they are. They use nice sound bites to enrich themselves.
And it shows libs for just who they are. They use nice sound bites to enrich themselves.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:38 am to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
A judge doesn’t have the authority to order officials to ignore and not in force laws.
If the enforcement of the laws is illegal, they 100% do.
Note for smoothbrains: my comment above was a general one about the power/role of courts and not a statement relating to the facts of the case or ruling in OP
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:41 am to TrueTiger
Typical Democrat Crook
I'm sure they go home to a mansion with security in a gated community while expecting the peasants to live with criminals.
I'm sure they go home to a mansion with security in a gated community while expecting the peasants to live with criminals.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
in effect in the jurisdiction of California’s Eastern District, which spans the Central Valley from Redding to Bakersfield.
This is in Loomer's post.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:44 am to TrueTiger
quote:
This is in Loomer's post.
Not in the (I'd wager intentionally) misleading language I quoted (which is all that 90%+ of people will see as its not part of the hook/teaser (part before "read more)
Also, her description of the ruling is wrong
quote:
The ruling prohibits Border Patrol agents from taking similar actions, restricting them from stopping people unless they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is in violation of U.S. immigration law. It also bars agents from carrying out warrantless arrests unless they have probable cause that the person is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:57 am to loogaroo
quote:
Lover her hate her....Loomer doing work.
Loomer is proof you can harness crazy for good.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:58 am to SlowFlowPro
The bottom line is that Biden has muddied the legal waters with his pseudo asylum policies. The Dems know that such will require litigation which will in effect nullify any deportation minus such. They knew that once across that Border all but the most heinous are here to stay. And vote for government subsidies I.e. the Dem Party. Not rocket science but highly contentious and inflammatory as it’s essentially an invasion and takeover of a people’s freedom and property just like the historical record reflects. And MAGA knows this.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:03 am to BCreed1
quote:They should be arrested or fined for knowingly renting to the 'undocumented' renters who they rest of us know as illegal aliens.
It's pretty clear that these people are all about their money.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
my comment above was a general one about the power/role of courts
Neither power nor role is set in stone. You've already seen the judiciary damage itself so badly that it's politically feasible (and maybe even advantageous) for the president to thumb his nose at them. They created that environment.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:17 am to Flats
quote:
it's politically feasible (and maybe even advantageous) for the president to thumb his nose at them.
I dunno about that.
He's taken some hits in polls since this Garcia thing started
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the enforcement of the laws is illegal, they 100% do.
And WHO determines if it is "illegal"?
the fricking judge
Don't be talking about "smoothbrains you fricking waterhead.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Note for smoothbrains: my comment above was a general one about the power/role of courts and not a statement relating to the facts of the case or ruling in OP
No one cares.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:20 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
And MAGA knows this.
And so do many of us.
The formula is:
Bring in millions of new democRat clients with blatant disregard for the law and with no due process.
Insist that all effort to correct the situation follow all laws and process to the extreme thereby delaying the correction for years and with all likelihood that efforts will be abandoned over time.
Convert illegals to voters thereby ensuring one party rule and a permanent socialist state.
Game over for the U.S.A.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:21 am to SlowFlowPro
That makes it look even worse.
Obvious that she's doing it for her husband's business. These people are stupid.
Obvious that she's doing it for her husband's business. These people are stupid.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I dunno about that.
He's taken some hits in polls since this Garcia thing started
https://news.gallup.com/poll/653897/americans-pass-judgment-courts.aspx
quote:
Between 2006 and 2020, Americans’ perceptions of their courts were most often in line with the median for OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, with a majority in each typically expressing confidence. Since 2020, confidence in the courts across the other OECD countries has been stable, while the U.S. has seen a sharp decline -- 24 percentage points -- in the past four years. The resulting 20-point gap in confidence between the U.S. and the median of OECD nations in 2024 is the largest in the Gallup trend, which dates to 2006.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:27 am to deeprig9
quote:
In the world of credibility, misses are much more meaningful than hits. This isn't baseball where batting .400 is considered amazing.
When leftwing outlets/msm are batting .125, .400 isn’t so bad after all
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:27 am to TrueTiger
I don’t care that this is a conflict of interest, and I don’t want it thrown out on those grounds. I want the judge that made a shitty ruling to be told she made a shitty ruling, and then to frick off.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:30 am to GoldenGuy
quote:
I want the judge that made a shitty ruling to be told she made a shitty ruling, and then to frick off.
That's the problem with the judiciary: they're essentially never told to frick off. You make a bad ruling you just go about your business and make the next bad ruling as you see fit. There are no negative consequences so they're not going to stop until there are.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News