- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This was an agreement by the Plaintiffs and Trump's DOJ
Correct. Nothing burger here.
DOGE Teams are made up of four people: a Team Lead, an attorney, and two engineers. There is a DOGE Team in each agency of the federal government now by executive order.
This is for one department. DOJ likely cut the deal for optics, and gave the two engineers on this DOGE Team the access in question.
This deal/decision will likely be used as precedent for the use of the DOGE Teams in all the other agencies moving forward in the name of INFOSEC controls on access.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:13 am to IT_Dawg
This sounds perfectly reasonable. I'm getting closer every day to being a burn it all down libertarian and I don't think the entire DOGE organization should have access and the ones who do should only have read access.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:13 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly - 81 year old judge. Appointed to current position by Bill Clinton
What a waste.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:13 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
The order comes after the Justice Department on Wednesday agreed in a proposed court order to limit access to the sensitive records to only two "special government employees" within DOGE, who will have read-only permission.
That's all DOGE needs.
This is an audit. DOGE is not changing data. They are reading the data then reporting on their findings.
This judicial order seems silly. The judge has ordered DOGE to do what they were planning to do.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:17 am to hogcard1964
Those were already part of existing programs (like PSLF). Biden was just taking credit for it.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:21 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Yea, it was “breaking” on Fox when I posted it and only said DOGE was blocked and by the judge with a note on the bottom saying this was developing. Fox prolly shoulda waited for more information before posting it on their site lol
It's honestly fine with me. Let the leftists believe they "won."
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:26 am to Gifman
quote:
Again, just ignore the judge.
To be fair, Biden was told by the Supreme Court that he couldn’t continue eliminating student loan debt. Yet, he kept doing it. This is just a lowly politicized District Court judge.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:26 am to IT_Dawg
See my “Activist Judges” post. 
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:28 am to IT_Dawg
That's actually a reasonable compromise.
Two DOGE people with "READ ONLY" clearance is all we need.
Two DOGE people with "READ ONLY" clearance is all we need.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:30 am to IT_Dawg
Article II says Trump calls the shots on how to run his department.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:33 am to mtntiger
quote:
That's actually a reasonable compromise.
Two DOGE people with "READ ONLY" clearance is all we need.
I agree. That’s not the headline or article when I originally posted it. I believe 2 people with read-only access is plenty. They will sift and pull the data off for the others to then run algorithms against
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:40 am to IT_Dawg
They can also pull in federal Treasury employees to help too if task beyond DOGE are needed.
Anyway let the ladies on the View and MSNBC viewers have their big win.
This won’t slow down DOGE at all.
Anyway let the ladies on the View and MSNBC viewers have their big win.
This won’t slow down DOGE at all.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Never happened.
He did that repeatedly.
just straight lying now
Posted on 2/6/25 at 11:44 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I'm getting closer every day to being a burn it all down libertarian and I don't think the entire DOGE organization should have access and the ones who do should only have read access.
What is your opinion of the people who have had access the last 4 years? Or the last 40 years? What are their ages, qualifications, etc?
Why should there be ANY limitations on who the Executive hires to analyze data in the Executive Branch?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:41 pm to IT_Dawg
This is actually a win. We now have a federal judge's ruling that DOGE SGE's can have access to Treasury records. It can be used as a precedent for other agencies who may try to fight access.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Never happened.
Opinions are like assholes.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 2:17 pm to Rambler
quote:
It can be used as a precedent for other agencies who may try to fight access.
Since when does that matter to Dem Federal Judges
They will keep filing until they get a judge on their side. Let’s face it, sooner or later, DOGE will have to be decided by SCOTUS…it will then be weaponized if Democrats ever control the Presidency again
They will create some BS, Justice advisory board and use DOGE as a precedent.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 2:19 pm
Popular
Back to top


0










