- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:53 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’ve not seen that before. Is that how he writes to his subordinates? Jesus Christ
I can't believe that's real. Doesn't he pay someone to type his posts?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:55 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
he's a felon
“You can’t keep it.”
—BF
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can't believe that's real. Doesn't he pay someone to type his posts?
It was meant to be a dm. Not even 48 hrs later, Bondi "appointed" Halligan.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh, it was real:
LINK
quote:
A message President Trump posted on Truth Social in September pressing Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute several political opponents was intended to be a direct message, reports say.
The Wall Street Journal reported multiple officials said Trump believed he had sent the message to Bondi privately. NBC also confirmed the message’s private intent with a former Trump administration official.
Both outlets report Trump was surprised to discover the message had been publicly posted on his Truth Social account, with the president trying to shrug it off.
The Wall Street Journal reported Bondi grew upset after seeing the message and called Trump and White House aides, leading him to post a second message on the social media platform praising Bondi.
LINK
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:57 pm to Ceazar
I think the Administration wins on appeal. It is close, so I won't be surprised either way. I just think they have the better argument.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:57 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
It was meant to be a dm
Wait, our President is DM'ing our AG ?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:58 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Oh, it was real:
My fricking god
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wait, our President is DM'ing our AG ?
Breaking barriers one firewall at a time.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
Look at 4Fappingpro the Indy go! 
465K by the weeks end! 
465K by the weeks end! 
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:59 pm to JimEverett
quote:
I think the Administration wins on appeal. It is close, so I won't be surprised either way. I just think they have the better argument.
At this point, I doubt they even appeal.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 12:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wait, our President is DM'ing our AG ?
Yes, the President of the United States is apparently communicating with the Attorney General via Truth Social DM in a text and tone that is indistinguishable from his normal shitposting. That's how absurd this administration is
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:01 pm to Fuzzy Dunlop
quote:
Yes, the President of the United States is apparently communicating with the Attorney General via Truth Social DM in a text and tone that is indistinguishable from his normal shitposting. That's how absurd this administration is
Man I always just assumed that was an online persona for the low IQ types.
This is just too much
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:01 pm to udtiger
And why you think the Dems want to stack the court if the right wants to stop this shite congress has the power to do something about ALL these rogue judges both sides are guilty They are their to serve their own purposes not mine and yours and that’s a fact
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You got man chowder on your face Fastfappingpro.
This is just too much
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:02 pm to BBONDS25
That's rich coming from you. Maybe you can tell me why Bondi is AG? Thus far I can't see it from a competence end. Gotta be because of looks.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:02 pm to Ceazar
I’ll say again
Nothing.will.happen.
The foxes are guarding the henhouse.
Nothing.will.happen.
The foxes are guarding the henhouse.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:03 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
That's rich coming from you. Maybe you can tell me why Bondi is AG?
Only possible reason to a misogynist is that she is pretty. Pretty girls can’t be smart. Due to their tiny lady brains. fricking moron.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:03 pm to TheHarahanian
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Clinton judge makes a decision that has never been made before in modern criminal history to save the disgraced former FBI director and the disgraced attorney general of New York.
The idea that these cases had to be thrown out because the prosecutor was “improperly appointed” is nonsense. Interim U.S. Attorneys are appointed this way all the time across Republican and Democratic administrations, and courts have consistently upheld their authority under the de facto officer doctrine. Even if someone’s paperwork isn’t perfect, their official acts remain valid. That’s why no other indictments Halligan touched were tossed. This judge ignored a century of precedent, bypassed the normal standard, and used the most technical, least-substantive loophole possible—because ruling on the actual evidence would have been far more damaging to Comey and Letitia James. If the prosecutor truly lacked authority, then all her cases should collapse. They didn’t. Only these two did. That tells you everything.
What makes the ruling even more outrageous is that the judge didn’t dispute a single piece of evidence. Not Comey’s admitted memo leaks. Not the IG’s criminal referral. Not the documented contradictions in James’s filings. She didn’t touch the facts because the facts were solid. Instead, she sidestepped them entirely to declare that the prosecutor’s internal DOJ appointment wasn’t tidy enough. That’s not justice. That’s a judicial escape hatch designed to protect two powerful political actors without having to publicly address what they actually did. No citizen in America would get their charges wiped out over a paperwork technicality. But for Comey and Letitia James, suddenly the rules change.
What is the remedy for this elected Republicans?
Page 7 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News