- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Boasberg, ordered Trump DOJ provide the court with more info in writing by Noon
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:11 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:11 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Funny how any litigant at any level, from JP court to SCOTUS, will make this sort of allegation when a ruling goes against him.
No funnier than how any lawyer at any level will knee-jerk and defend the judiciary.
0
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They aren't "running geopolitics and national security" They're filing lawsuits alleging the admin didn't follow the law/Constitution. Due to the novel applications of statutory law by the admin, and the admin possibly ignoring court orders, we're in pretty new territory here.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:43 am to BurlesonCountyAg
Copy of the response the DOJ sent to the judge
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I support the Constitution and its limitations on government action and following the rule of law.
exactly. It's wild how many people just want to defy judges, like that is a good thing. Those people were due in court, the judge is 100% in the right here to order them back. Hopefully the judge holds someone in contempt.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:00 am to beebefootballfan
quote:
Copy of the response the DOJ sent to the judge
and youre fine with that? Our 3 branches are equally important and currently POTUS has launched a war on any judge who doesnt rule his way. That is not how this is supposed to work, nor how you should want it to work
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:02 am to GamecockUltimate
quote:
Our 3 branches are equally important
Co-equal does not make a district court judge equal to the President.
Only SCOTUS is co-equal.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:11 am to udtiger
quote:
Co-equal does not make a district court judge equal to the President.
Only SCOTUS is co-equa
That doesnt mean that POTUS and the DOJ can just not listen to what a federal judge says. POTUS can appeal the rulings if they don't like them. That said just flying them out when they have a hearing is out of order
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 11:12 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:13 am to GamecockUltimate
. Y'all lost. Deal with it.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Here, Trump is arguably violating the law in a half dozen ways.
Name them, please. I think it would help us all if there were 6 violations of law Trump! was effecting.
I’ll grant that whether these are bad guys or not is mostly irrelevant.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Where is anyone here making that argument?
The point is that litigants have ALLEGED that he has done so and that the Judiciary needs to answer that question.
Oh look lawyers wanting more bureaucracy and court cases and slow decisions and stalling and appeals and more money!
frick off, the president clearly has the power to run the Executive branch. Get fricked with your bureaucracy and lawfare.
Otherwise this country is fricked because every action is going to take 8 years to even begin.
fricking lawyers, I swear.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:34 am to GamecockUltimate
quote:Listened then ignored.
can just not listen to what a federal judge says
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:36 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:Read their briefs, which are available online.quote:Name them, please.
Here, Trump is arguably violating the law in a half dozen ways.
I don't necessarily agree with them, and I certainly am not going to make their arguments for them here.
The POINT is that the allegations have been made in duly-filed pleadings, and they should be addressed in due course.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:38 am to AggieHank86
It's going to be a rough 8-12 years for you.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Absolutely NO ONE takes Loomer seriously, least of all a federal judge.
Don’t tell me you’re taking into account the merits of the subjects here all of a sudden.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:42 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The POINT is that the allegations have been made in duly-filed pleadings, and they should be addressed in due course.
Nope
The president can carry out his duties as assigned to him by the electorate and the Constitution.
A district court judge does NOT have the power given to them by the electorate nor the Constitution to direct the President on matters designated to him by the Constitution.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:42 am to AggieHank86
quote:Just like your Girl Fani!
The POINT is that the allegations have been made in duly-filed pleadings, and they should be addressed in due course.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:43 am to GeauxBurrow312
They better bring up this piece of trashes conflict or interest as well. That could add weight to his removal.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:45 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Read their briefs, which are available online.
You can’t just give 6 bullet points? Come on, man
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:50 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You are either an idiot or an amnesiac. Perhaps both.
The favorite tactic when one has no defense
Posted on 3/18/25 at 3:03 pm to cajunangelle
Seriously just tell that judge to frick off. Let his law clerks fly those gang members back and they can stay with him in his house while the appeals take their course.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News