- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Scarborough: 2nd Amendment Doesn’t Protect ‘Weapons of War’
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:15 pm to Lima Whiskey
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:15 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Joe is either dishonest, or historically illiterate.
He can be both
1
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:17 pm to Wtodd
That's why me and pops got us some .22 ARs
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:18 pm to Wtodd
Hey Joe, about the only gun that I know of that has never been used as a weapon of war is a derringer. You saying that should be the only gun us Americans are allowed to own?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:18 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Joe is either dishonest, or historically illiterate.
Why not both?
Sorry Lou, you beat me to it.
This post was edited on 3/18/19 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:20 pm to Wtodd
Mika must has seriously crazy poon for this guy to become so whipped
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:21 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
They understood, and worried, that a standing army could be used by the central government to suppress the people.
All circles back to the surging Marxist wing disguising itself as the DNC. Communism is nothing more than failed Socialism forced upon the people at the end of a gun barrel. When starving citizens revolt against a socialist dictatorship, it'd sure be alot better if those citizens had inferior, or no weapons at all
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:21 pm to TideCPA
quote:
Heck, look at US v. Miller - they ruled that sawed-off shotguns could be banned because they DON'T have a military application.
Miller was a very poorly argued and decided case too. The decision hinged on the opinion that short-barreled shotguns do not serve a useful purpose as ordinary military equipment but such shotguns found widespread use in WW1 and would see use in every US-participated conflict since.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:22 pm to TideCPA
Because muskets were all they knew. There was no need for them to specify.
They had no knowledge of what was to come.
They had no knowledge of what was to come.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:22 pm to Clames
quote:
but such shotguns found widespread use in WW1
Ehhhh, they may have been widely issued, but didn't see much trigger time at all
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:23 pm to VOR
quote:
The comparison for purposes of the Framers’ intent isn’t very useful.
Like you have a clue kid.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:23 pm to VOR
quote:
Because muskets were all they knew. There was no need for them to specify.
They had no knowledge of what was to come.
Are you trying to be obtuse or is that just a result of your health problems?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:24 pm to Clames
It certainly didn't protect "Weapons of Whore" with him.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:25 pm to Wtodd
Uh, Joe- it's called "inalienable", you stooge.
The left really is a psychotic bunch. They try to tell us Trump is Hitler and we don't need guns for protection from tyranny- at the same time. Wrong on both counts.
The left really is a psychotic bunch. They try to tell us Trump is Hitler and we don't need guns for protection from tyranny- at the same time. Wrong on both counts.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:26 pm to Taxing Authority
Yep it starts with I own guns and I am a hunter but.......
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:27 pm to Wtodd
What’s ironic is that the US military currently uses pump shotguns, semi-auto shotguns, semi-auto handguns, and bolt-action rifles. Those are all literally current “weapons of war”. Yet leftists only want to ban semi-automatic rifles, which have not been standard issue for over half a century.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:27 pm to ninthward
quote:
Yep it starts with I own guns and I am a hunter but.......
...you can't hunt a deer with an AR-15. There won't be anything left of it after you shoot it!
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:28 pm to VOR
quote:
Because muskets were all they knew.
This is a lie, you maybe grievously ignorant of the state of small arms technology of that time but the Founders certainly were not.
quote:
There was no need for them to specify.
They knew that arms could mean a variety of personally owned weapons. Muskets, pistols, knives, swords, daggers, etc. Hence the non-non-specific term "arms".
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:28 pm to ninthward
And usually includes some mention of clips.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 12:32 pm to VOR
quote:
Because muskets were all they knew. There was no need for them to specify.
They had no knowledge of what was to come.
They would have welcomed the effectiveness of modern firearms. Because it reduces the advantage a regular force has over the average citizen.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News