- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Rogan on how Christ might/could come back on the second coming
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:51 am to lake chuck fan
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:51 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Simple explanation.... the writers knew the churches receiving the particular "epistles" (letters) already knew these facts.
While that’s possible, it’s not plausible and definitely not likely.
quote:
Also, each of the letters were meant to address a particular issue each respective church was facing. You’re taking the letters out of the context in which they were written.
Maybe so, but in those letters they do talk a great deal about Jesus though. Firstborn son of the most high God, created before the heavens and earth were created, through him all things were made, he was the deity who led the Israelites out of Egypt, he took on a body of flesh, was killed by the archons, resurrected by his father, exalted and earned the name Jesus after his resurrection, he was the final substitutionary atonement sacrifice, he was God’s high priest in the heavenly temple, he will come (not come again) to judge the living and the dead…
It’s not an argument of silence since they weren’t silent about their Lord Jesus.
Never in those 14 letters did they write “remember that time Jesus said this/that” or “your opinion is wrong because Jesus said XyZ about it when we were walking through Galilee”. James never mentions being Jesus’ literal biological brother - that would have been important and would have made his letter carry more weight - if that story had been invented by the time of the writing of the letter.
Philo of Alexandria was a Jew who basically worshipped Jesus before he had earned that name. He was a pre-existent heavenly deity, and later on after all those 14 epistles were written, stories popped up about Jesus being a literal human on earth. The same sort of this happened to Osiris (the Egyptian savior god of the 1st century BCE and CE) and the Greek Plutarch wrote about how the initiates believed the stories of Osiris on earth but the mature knew the “real” truth that Osiris was killed in heaven and resurrected in heaven.
Every one of y’all is being duped. Everything I’m telling you is verifiable if you’d look it up yourselves. Don’t take my word for it - verify it yourselves and learn something.
0
Posted on 12/7/25 at 11:43 am to Squirrelmeister
Did Paul have to convince the apostles he was actually now a good guy after having stood by the pit where the Jews stoned Stephen? Paul was contemporaneous with Peter and Paul’s mission was to convert the gentiles.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 11:54 am to Padme
quote:
What's more virgin than a computer?'
uhhh...
How much porn do you think the average computer is involved in... per day...
Posted on 12/7/25 at 12:10 pm to Padme
quote:
AI can never supersede the algorithm programmed into its data mining.
It already has. Repeatedly.
Where do you get off thinking you're such an expert that you can make such a claim anyways?
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 12/7/25 at 12:23 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:Because it wasn't Paul's responsibility to. Matthew Mark Luke and John already documented it. Paul's job was to spread the gospel.
None of those mention anything about Jesus ever having been on earth
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:08 pm to Stealth Matrix
quote:
Spitballing as a non-religious guy, if anything, AI would be the anti-Christ. What's the polar opposite of life? Non-life. A computer without the soul of life but coming to humanity with promises of Utopia For All.
This is where I was going. Rogan is promoting a possible future anti-Christ of at least a tool thereof. And how influential is Rogan? And if some how there are no Christians around to counter, then the most traveled road will be the path taken by the masses.
On a side note, I saw a glimpse of a spectacular Christmas light show done in the sky via drones a few nights ago. No doubt in my mind tha AI will produce some spectacular holographic images in the future, the type of thing that might make mere mortals worship. And I don’t think that’s being hyperbolic.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
when I pointed out the type of Christianity that he would promote would not be "real" Christianity to most on this forum.
Well if that’s so, you were spot on.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:38 pm to The Cool No 9
quote:
Because it wasn't Paul's responsibility to. Matthew Mark Luke and John already documented it
Well it is historical fact that Paul’s letters - every single one of the genuine undisputed ones - was written before the first gospel was written. Most likely Paul was dead before the very first one was outlined. Only the silliest of apologists, who assert things with no evidence and mountains of contrary evidence, assert that Paul wrote after the gospels were written. I don’t even think foomancuck would even allege something so silly.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 7:32 pm to Padme
Joe Rogan called Kanye crazy??
Posted on 12/7/25 at 7:38 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
checks out. even Theo ran circles around him re: Palintr
Every man has a price, including Joe.
Rogan did 3 hour 30 minute podcast with Thiel did not ask one question about Palintir, nor Peter's love of talking about the antichrist, coupled with Rogan trying to change the subject when Theo and Tim Dillon start trolling Thiel tells you all you need to know about Rogan.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 8:07 pm to Padme
This is the political board, dummy.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 6:35 am to Padme
Hey Joe,
We already know about this.
It's called 'The Abomination That Causes Desolation'.
Look it up.
In the Bible.
Paul was already dead by then.
AC can't be AI.
AC might use AI for his creation, but he himself isn't AI.
ffs
He was named Yeshua at birth. Yeshua was a common name. It didnt need to bea earned.
We already know about this.
It's called 'The Abomination That Causes Desolation'.
Look it up.
In the Bible.
quote:
Because it wasn't Paul's responsibility to. Matthew Mark Luke and John already documented it
Paul was already dead by then.
quote:
AI would be the anti-Christ
AC can't be AI.
AC might use AI for his creation, but he himself isn't AI.
ffs
quote:
who basically worshipped Jesus before he had earned that name
He was named Yeshua at birth. Yeshua was a common name. It didnt need to bea earned.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 6:41 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 6:43 am to SlowFlowPro
My melt was, and still is, over the notion that “this forum” has anything remotely approaching a consensus idea of Christianity. It’s sheer silliness.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:05 am to Y.A. Tittle
It's a pretty constant meme on here
A 13-pager that was consistently on page 1 all weekend
ETA: my use or "melt" didn't apply to your comments. This wasn't the only thread with that discussion. The melt was over the people who wanted to use Rogan to promote Christianity and "win" the culture war.
A 13-pager that was consistently on page 1 all weekend
ETA: my use or "melt" didn't apply to your comments. This wasn't the only thread with that discussion. The melt was over the people who wanted to use Rogan to promote Christianity and "win" the culture war.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 7:07 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:06 am to Padme
That was quite literally the stupidest fricking thing I’ve ever listened to
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:07 am to SlowFlowPro
What percent of posters do you think have articulated their notion of Christianity? Seems rather minuscule to me. What do you think mine is?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News