- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Kent on Tucker: Mafia style tactics being used to intimidate Trump
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:45 am to Penrod
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:45 am to Penrod
quote:
Foolish narrative. Of course we are in a war with Iran. For the rest of your life this will be referred to as “The Iran War” or something of that sort.
maybe they'll come out with a time/life series on this war like they did with the war with grenada! "daddy what did you do during the war with grenada?"
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:46 am to the808bass
Maybe starting up Korea as soon as WWII was over then starting up Viet Nam as soon as Korea was over then starting up Middle East as soon as Viet Nam was over then starting up WarOnDrugs as soon as Middle East was over then starting up Iraq as soon as WarOnDrugs was over (and tossing in an Afghanistan chaser) then starting up full-on Afghanistan as soon as Iraq was over then starting up Ukraine as soon as full-on Afghanistan was over then starting up Iran when Ukraine is fading was.... just coincidence.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:48 am to SallysHuman
quote:
money?
Ding, ding, ding!
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:54 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
RICO uses this type evidence to charge, try and convict people all the time.
No, they do not.
quote:
It's 75 years of evidence
No, it isn't.
But thanks for pointing out that you're claiming that you "know" what is happening with our current president because of what happened with JFK over 60 years ago.
Biden pulled the troops out of Afghanistan and although he claimed he would use force to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, he didn't attack them. Yeah, he authorized aid to Ukraine, but we didn't start that war or fight in it.
Why didn't the "Deep State" put a bullet in his head?
Jimmy Carter's biggest military intervention was Operation Eagle claw...barely anything, and it was at the end of his term. Why'd they let him live for four years without a war?
Reagan had a 1 week excursion into Grenada, a two year campaign in Lebanon involving maybe 1500 Marines, and he bombed Libya. No major "money-making" wars. Why'd they let him fool around with piddly stuff like that for 8 years without putting a car bomb under his limo or a severed horse's head in his bed at the WH?
Clinton: Somalia was three months, Bosnia was three weeks, Kosovo was 2 1/2 months, and Desert Fox was four days. Again, eight years of no long protracted "money-making" wars. And he's still breathing.
You're falling for the same bullshite you paranoid populists always fall for. Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy. You start with your conclusion and only notice the patterns that conform to your pre-conceived conclusion, ignoring the ones that don't.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:56 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Reagan had a 1 week excursion into Grenada, a two year campaign in Lebanon involving maybe 1500 Marines, and he bombed Libya. No major "money-making" wars.
The US spent nothing on the military during the Reagan presidency. There was no cold war spending. He refused to build up the military and stated that he would not do so.
I remember this.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:00 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
The US spent nothing on the military during the Reagan presidency. There was no cold war spending. He refused to build up the military and stated that he would not do so.
So military spending now counts as RICO-level "evidence?" I thought it was about continually starting wars for profit.
That goal post looks like it's further back in the end zone than when we started this discussion.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:04 am to Timeoday
Why was this moron chosen in the first place, much less confirmed? Someone was not doing the proper vetting on the front end.
Plus, if Trump always thought he was wanting in terms of security, why do you advocate for this guy in the first place? Why wait so long?
If anything his resignation shows that he was putting veritable incompetents into sensitive positions.
Plus, if Trump always thought he was wanting in terms of security, why do you advocate for this guy in the first place? Why wait so long?
If anything his resignation shows that he was putting veritable incompetents into sensitive positions.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:07 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
Reagan's administration revived the B-1 bomber program, which had been canceled by the Carter Administration, and began production of the MX Peacekeeper missile. Reagan's response to Soviet deployment of the SS-20 missile was his approval of NATO's deployment of the Pershing II missile in West Germany, despite much protest.
By the time Reagan stepped down from the helm, he had expanded the U.S. military budget to a staggering 43% increase over the total expenditure during the height of the Vietnam war. That meant the increase of tens of thousands of troops, more weapons and equipment, not to mention a beefed-up intelligence program.
"Star Wars" One of Reagan's controversial proposals was the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a system intended to make the U.S. invulnerable to nuclear missile attacks by the Soviet Union. By stationing those defenses in outer space, the U.S. was able to circumvent the United Nation's Anti-Ballistic (ABM) Treaty. In a speech in 1983, President Reagan announced his plans to create a shield against nuclear missile attacks. The news media quickly dubbed his new proposal for the SDI as "Star Wars," as well as characterizing it as a carelessly drawn-up science fiction idea.
LINK
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:08 am to Deuces
quote:
Donald Trump is willing to die for this.
If what Kent said has any truth, this isn't the question. The question is whether or not Trump is willing to let his wife, children, and grandchildren suffer.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:08 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Why was this moron chosen in the first place, much less confirmed?
This is the real question.
My suspicion is that Trump is hiring physically attractive candidates rather than competent candidates. See Noem.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:09 am to theunknownknight
quote:
If what Kent said has any truth
If-pigs-could-fly-arse quote.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:10 am to the808bass
quote:
If-pigs-could-fly-arse quote.
Please.
Like any of us know one way or another.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:11 am to theunknownknight
“If a wild statement with no foundation is true, then another wild statement follows.”
Incredible work.
Incredible work.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:11 am to dickkellog
quote:
when kirk was killed no one had even imagined a war with iran,
That’s absolute BS. Kirk had been making trips to the WH to lobby against a war with Iran right before 12 day war last summer.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:12 am to AndrewAnglin
quote:
Kirk had been making trips to the WH to lobby against a war with Iran right before 12 day war last summer.
So obviously Kirk didn’t publicly support Trump’s action in Iran and that’s what led to the Jews killing him.
Right? I mean that’s obviously the case. Right?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:12 am to Burt Reynolds
I don’t know which is worse. The bullshite clickme conspiracy shite that these guys put out, the retards who repost it elsewhere, or the people who actually believe it.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:13 am to the808bass
quote:
“If a wild statement with no foundation is true, then another wild statement follows.”
Incredible work.
Damn, you've gotten stupid or something.
It’s a “wild statement” to think people are threatening Trump after he was clearly allowed to get shot in PA?
Have you lost your mind?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:14 am to theunknownknight
quote:
It’s a “wild statement” to think people are threatening Trump after he was clearly allowed to get shot in PA?
It is a wild statement to say that Israeli intelligence is clearly threatening the lives of the US President’s family.
I’m not the one who’s “gotten stupid” in this equation. frick out of here.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:15 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
So military spending now counts as RICO-level "evidence?" I thought it was about continually starting wars for profit.
Do you think that the MIC makes no money with military build-up? They don't give two schitts how the money is printed and handed to them, only that it is. But realistically, it's easier to print those MICbucks while we are dropping bombs on little brown people somewhere. Gotta replace that ordnance.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:18 am to dickkellog
quote:
when kirk was killed no one had even imagined a war with iran
That is hilariously untrue. Kirk himself was urging Trump not to go to war with Iran. This wasn't reading the tea leaves. It has been an outright, and obvious agenda of Israel to purge Iran and drain Gaza and expand to the "greater israel" project.
And it doesn't stop there, either.
Popular
Back to top


0






