Started By
Message

re: Joe Kent on Tucker: Mafia style tactics being used to intimidate Trump

Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:45 am to
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2947 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Foolish narrative. Of course we are in a war with Iran. For the rest of your life this will be referred to as “The Iran War” or something of that sort.


maybe they'll come out with a time/life series on this war like they did with the war with grenada! "daddy what did you do during the war with grenada?"
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10104 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:46 am to
Maybe starting up Korea as soon as WWII was over then starting up Viet Nam as soon as Korea was over then starting up Middle East as soon as Viet Nam was over then starting up WarOnDrugs as soon as Middle East was over then starting up Iraq as soon as WarOnDrugs was over (and tossing in an Afghanistan chaser) then starting up full-on Afghanistan as soon as Iraq was over then starting up Ukraine as soon as full-on Afghanistan was over then starting up Iran when Ukraine is fading was.... just coincidence.
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
7904 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:48 am to
quote:

money?


Ding, ding, ding!
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

RICO uses this type evidence to charge, try and convict people all the time.


No, they do not.

quote:

It's 75 years of evidence


No, it isn't.

But thanks for pointing out that you're claiming that you "know" what is happening with our current president because of what happened with JFK over 60 years ago.

Biden pulled the troops out of Afghanistan and although he claimed he would use force to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, he didn't attack them. Yeah, he authorized aid to Ukraine, but we didn't start that war or fight in it.

Why didn't the "Deep State" put a bullet in his head?

Jimmy Carter's biggest military intervention was Operation Eagle claw...barely anything, and it was at the end of his term. Why'd they let him live for four years without a war?

Reagan had a 1 week excursion into Grenada, a two year campaign in Lebanon involving maybe 1500 Marines, and he bombed Libya. No major "money-making" wars. Why'd they let him fool around with piddly stuff like that for 8 years without putting a car bomb under his limo or a severed horse's head in his bed at the WH?

Clinton: Somalia was three months, Bosnia was three weeks, Kosovo was 2 1/2 months, and Desert Fox was four days. Again, eight years of no long protracted "money-making" wars. And he's still breathing.

You're falling for the same bullshite you paranoid populists always fall for. Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy. You start with your conclusion and only notice the patterns that conform to your pre-conceived conclusion, ignoring the ones that don't.

Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10104 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Reagan had a 1 week excursion into Grenada, a two year campaign in Lebanon involving maybe 1500 Marines, and he bombed Libya. No major "money-making" wars.


The US spent nothing on the military during the Reagan presidency. There was no cold war spending. He refused to build up the military and stated that he would not do so.

I remember this.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:00 am to
quote:

The US spent nothing on the military during the Reagan presidency. There was no cold war spending. He refused to build up the military and stated that he would not do so.


So military spending now counts as RICO-level "evidence?" I thought it was about continually starting wars for profit.

That goal post looks like it's further back in the end zone than when we started this discussion.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37583 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:04 am to
Why was this moron chosen in the first place, much less confirmed? Someone was not doing the proper vetting on the front end.

Plus, if Trump always thought he was wanting in terms of security, why do you advocate for this guy in the first place? Why wait so long?

If anything his resignation shows that he was putting veritable incompetents into sensitive positions.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Reagan's administration revived the B-1 bomber program, which had been canceled by the Carter Administration, and began production of the MX Peacekeeper missile. Reagan's response to Soviet deployment of the SS-20 missile was his approval of NATO's deployment of the Pershing II missile in West Germany, despite much protest.

By the time Reagan stepped down from the helm, he had expanded the U.S. military budget to a staggering 43% increase over the total expenditure during the height of the Vietnam war. That meant the increase of tens of thousands of troops, more weapons and equipment, not to mention a beefed-up intelligence program.

"Star Wars" One of Reagan's controversial proposals was the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a system intended to make the U.S. invulnerable to nuclear missile attacks by the Soviet Union. By stationing those defenses in outer space, the U.S. was able to circumvent the United Nation's Anti-Ballistic (ABM) Treaty. In a speech in 1983, President Reagan announced his plans to create a shield against nuclear missile attacks. The news media quickly dubbed his new proposal for the SDI as "Star Wars," as well as characterizing it as a carelessly drawn-up science fiction idea.


LINK
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Donald Trump is willing to die for this.


If what Kent said has any truth, this isn't the question. The question is whether or not Trump is willing to let his wife, children, and grandchildren suffer.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Why was this moron chosen in the first place, much less confirmed?


This is the real question.

My suspicion is that Trump is hiring physically attractive candidates rather than competent candidates. See Noem.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:09 am to
quote:

If what Kent said has any truth


If-pigs-could-fly-arse quote.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

If-pigs-could-fly-arse quote.


Please.

Like any of us know one way or another.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:11 am to
“If a wild statement with no foundation is true, then another wild statement follows.”

Incredible work.
Posted by AndrewAnglin
Member since Dec 2025
132 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

when kirk was killed no one had even imagined a war with iran,


That’s absolute BS. Kirk had been making trips to the WH to lobby against a war with Iran right before 12 day war last summer.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Kirk had been making trips to the WH to lobby against a war with Iran right before 12 day war last summer.


So obviously Kirk didn’t publicly support Trump’s action in Iran and that’s what led to the Jews killing him.

Right? I mean that’s obviously the case. Right?
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
17581 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:12 am to
I don’t know which is worse. The bullshite clickme conspiracy shite that these guys put out, the retards who repost it elsewhere, or the people who actually believe it.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60933 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

“If a wild statement with no foundation is true, then another wild statement follows.”

Incredible work.


Damn, you've gotten stupid or something.

It’s a “wild statement” to think people are threatening Trump after he was clearly allowed to get shot in PA?

Have you lost your mind?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

It’s a “wild statement” to think people are threatening Trump after he was clearly allowed to get shot in PA?


It is a wild statement to say that Israeli intelligence is clearly threatening the lives of the US President’s family.

I’m not the one who’s “gotten stupid” in this equation. frick out of here.
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10104 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:15 am to
quote:

So military spending now counts as RICO-level "evidence?" I thought it was about continually starting wars for profit.


Do you think that the MIC makes no money with military build-up? They don't give two schitts how the money is printed and handed to them, only that it is. But realistically, it's easier to print those MICbucks while we are dropping bombs on little brown people somewhere. Gotta replace that ordnance.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29914 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:


when kirk was killed no one had even imagined a war with iran


That is hilariously untrue. Kirk himself was urging Trump not to go to war with Iran. This wasn't reading the tea leaves. It has been an outright, and obvious agenda of Israel to purge Iran and drain Gaza and expand to the "greater israel" project.

And it doesn't stop there, either.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram