- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Biden did not ignore/defy the Supreme Court re: Student Loans
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:53 am to HagaDaga
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:53 am to HagaDaga
quote:
We should have a GFM set up to pay him to create a counter argument for himself. Would be funny to watch, as we all know that if you pay a lawyer enough he'll find a way to find a counter, even if its his own.
2
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:54 am to SlowFlowPro
That is a good, long, and detailed explanation.
But like the saying goes,
if you're explaining, you're losing.
But like the saying goes,
if you're explaining, you're losing.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:54 am to HeadCall
quote:
Did you know that Trump has also never ignored a judicial order? I
Where did I say he did?
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:55 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
so I'm wearing my retarded clothes today.
from my observations, you've been wearing the same outfit for years.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:55 am to HeadCall
quote:
Did you know that Trump has also never ignored a judicial order? I don’t know why the media and all the extremist leftists like you are bleeding over something that hasn’t even happened.
I'm sure the AOC clip of her saying Biden should ignore SCOTUS will be ignored.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:55 am to SlowFlowPro
Diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder:
Grandiose sense of self-importance.
Fixation on fantasies of success or power.
Excessive need for admiration.
Sense of entitlement.
Belief that they are “special” or superior.
Exploitative in relationships.
Envious or believing others are envious of them.
Geez, you are an insufferable prick.
Grandiose sense of self-importance.
Fixation on fantasies of success or power.
Excessive need for admiration.
Sense of entitlement.
Belief that they are “special” or superior.
Exploitative in relationships.
Envious or believing others are envious of them.
Geez, you are an insufferable prick.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:55 am to the808bass
I'm actually at a point where I get to be selective in who I take and don't have to argue against my beliefs, but that's a digression.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:56 am to HagaDaga
quote:
I'm sure the AOC clip of her saying Biden should ignore SCOTUS will be ignored.
It will be because it's literally irrelevant to the discussion.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:56 am to the808bass
Nice. Perfect. Well done with that one. 
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:57 am to HagaDaga
Barry Obama also defied court orders.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:58 am to DawgCountry
quote:
would never expect you to say a bad word about Biden anyway, even as a "libertarian" which nobody believes
Truth.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SCOTUS Blog
Isn't that the dude facing life in prison for smoking crack, fricking underage prostitutes, embezzlement, tax evasion, etc?
I just realized that this dude is the non nepo Hunter Biden
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Emotional thinking has overtaken the board as well as echo chamber group think. That's exactly why I try to educate them with threads like this.
Yes, because we need the lawyer who makes his living off manipulating the emotions of others to explain everything to us.
Maybe you should take a step back and realize you aren’t the bastion of knowledge you like to project.
This post was edited on 2/12/25 at 9:00 am
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:59 am to Scruffy
quote:This +1000000000000000
It is his fervor to remain “non-partisan” that he is unable to actual give an actual opinion on anything, resulting in idiotic hijacks of 99% of the threads he posts in.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:00 am to Hodag
quote:
Isn't that the dude facing life in prison
I dunno about life, but he's facing serious jail time for tax issues and possibly taking client money.
I don't know what that has to do with reporting on the case in real time. I picked SCOTUS Blog to avoid people melting over a more MSM choice
As I said earlier, the facts reported shouldn't be an issue with anyone.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It will be because it's literally irrelevant to the discussion.
No it wouldnt be cause essentially you are melting over people saying he should ignore the rulings, of lower court judges. The reasons used are irrelevant to the overall melt reason. So yes a house Rep saying SCOTUS should be ignored shows this isn't just a maga thing.
Ignoring by still doing it the way it's done or ignoring by finding a work around to get it done, is still ignoring it and daring the courts to stop it, even the new approach. It's the system, I get that, but doesn't mean it's not ignoring nonetheless.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:01 am to The Eric
quote:
Yes, because we need the lawyer who makes his living off manipulating the emotions of others to explain everything to us.
That doesn't apply to me so
quote:
Maybe you should take a step back and realize you aren’t the bastion of knowledge you like to project.
The irony of you posting this, in this thread, with these reactions, is skrong
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
The president has total control over the executive - hard stop
He can do what he wants
He can do what he wants
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:03 am to HagaDaga
quote:
Ignoring by still doing it the way it's done or ignoring by finding a work around to get it done, is still ignoring it and daring the courts to stop it, even the new approach.
This is axiomatic. To people who think normally.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 9:03 am to HagaDaga
quote:
No it wouldnt be cause essentially you are melting
quote:
Ignoring by still doing it the way it's done or ignoring by finding a work around to get it done, is still ignoring it
This statement is 100% not true.
If an action was illegal for exceeding statutory authority, but legal under different statutory authority, then there is specifically no issue and nothing was ignored.
You just don't like it because it pops a bubble and destroys a talking point you value.
Page 5 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News