re: JD Vance's remarks have struck a little too close to home for Jennifer Aniston

When is the last time we had a childless candidate on the Presidential ballot?

There's a better way to convey the message, but there is evidence that this argument actually gained traction in Europe where at one point many leaders within the EU and heads of individual countries were childless and attacks that they "had no skin in the game" started moving the needle away from the far left nonsense.

Being a parent effects everything in your life and you approach things from a different perspective. Life is no longer a game but rather a fulcrum that impacts the one thing you love more than anything else.

And frankly, even if it invites the obvious criticism and blowback, politicians and influential people need to start telling women that second wave feminism was a crock to designed to double the labor supply, suppress wages and maximize stakeholder profits at the expense of the personal fulfillment that a stable nuclear family provides. Oh, and all the talk about how you can delay marriage and childbirth until after you've lived your dreams and conquered your goals? Yeah, biology and mother nature don't give too sh*ts about your feelings.

It doesn’t really matter. Difficulty conceiving is emotionally traumatic for women who actually want a child, and Vance’s comments come off as a man who doesn’t understand.

The gotcha is that Kamala has 2 stepchildren, it is insensitive to women, Aniston has made this a big thing, and they have added to this gotcha that JD Vance would be against IVF.

quote:

---

To say that someone without kids doesn't have a direct stake in America is a dumb comment. It alienates many people when you tell them they have no value and are worthless. If you're trying to win people to your ideology then common sense should tell you not to make people feel they're beneath you.

---

First, I agree, and so does JD Vance (that humans without children still have worth and stake in America).

Second, you can't really disconnect traditionalism and conservatism from having children, as they go hand in hand. That doesn't mean the childless aren't going to be welcomed or valued, but they should obviously come in celebrating (at least in theory) the concept of the family.

Third, anyone reasonable should recognize the dangers of a society run by people with less stake in the future than those who came before them.

The truth is this: Traditionalists view the family as the fundamental building block of American society and culture - not the individual. That's going to be a major crux of this GOPe/MAGA/libertarian/conservative debate moving forward.

I bet she has no problem telling men they can’t have an opinion on abortion since they can’t have a baby

Dump him.

Pick up Vivek or Tulsi

He is hurting more than helping

quote:

---

It doesn’t really matter. Difficulty conceiving is emotionally traumatic for women who actually want a child, and Vance’s comments come off as a man who doesn’t understand.

---

Plus Aniston said he is against IVF.

This is plain stupidity that was taken out of context ,but it stands. JD is silent on his abortion stance. It most likely is for the 6 wk ban.

Tulsi or Elise in re-do please.

quote:

---

Lets have a conversation about who Vance's half Hindi children think God is?

---

Which god do you believe in?

Says Jennifer as she pets her cat