- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JD Vance does not back down to this scumbag NY Times Reporter
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:53 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:53 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Ronricks is in rare form this morning.
It's not a real ronricks thread until he talks about his body count.
0
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:54 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
It really just takes an insufferable pompous arse to think that to be considered an educated or highly intelligent person, then you must align yourself with leftist ideology or you by default aren’t educated, or highly intelligence.
Nobody argued this. Holy shite what a straw man.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:54 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The best answer would be:
"Our election system declared Joe Biden the winner"
Definitely a better, more intelligent and coherent response.
It would not "own the libs" for the NPCs, though.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:58 am to SDVTiger
quote:
JDs question is also very important to a chunk of the population
But still irrelevant to her question.
quote:
Oh noz
Again, he fell into her trap both ways, by allowing her to frame his non-response and then describe his whataboutism crutch.
It's just bad in terms of logic/projection.
quote:
If it alter the outcome of the election then its a question they need to answer
And that's a separate discussion.
A question of who won is a binary response in our system. Either Trump or Biden won.
A discussion of how we got there is a completely separate conversation/discussion.
Again, why I'm pointing out the rhetorical devolution from the Right with this example.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:00 am to FLTech
Big tech silencing the laptop story was part of the puzzle. He knows that the 51 intelligence experts, and the letter they signed, magnified it as well.
I am curious as to why he didn’t push that harder.
Most of them admitted that they never saw any evidence to support that claim, and simply agreed over a telephone call. It was nothing but a political hustle job.
I am curious as to why he didn’t push that harder.
Most of them admitted that they never saw any evidence to support that claim, and simply agreed over a telephone call. It was nothing but a political hustle job.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She refused. Why?
Because it was non-responsive whataboutism.
That is as dishonest as an email from a Nigerian prince.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:07 am to NC_Tigah
It's a media interview. The questions flow one way and she certainly not going to respond to a non-responsive and irrelevant question. All you're doing is dismissing the reality of the situation and trying to spin a bad response because you like it.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:09 am to ronricks
quote:
That’s how insecure you are.
Says the guy bragging about his size and saying he can beat up everyone.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:09 am to ronricks
I find people like you to be the most despicable amongst the Krewe of TDS.
You have a lot in common with Harris and Walz. You may as well vote for them.
You have a lot in common with Harris and Walz. You may as well vote for them.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The questions flow one way
Talk about a weak stance.
frick the state run media.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:11 am to jimmy the leg
SFP and Ronricks?
Lol. This thread is dick cancer.
Bye
Lol. This thread is dick cancer.
Bye
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It would not "own the libs" for the NPCs
no it doesn't
but it denies them the gotcha and allows the doubt to linger
This post was edited on 10/12/24 at 9:12 am
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:13 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Talk about a weak stance.
frick the state run media.
Nobody forced him to do the interview
As I said earlier, if he prefers a disordered, free flowing conversation, there are multiple podcasts who'd love to have him
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:14 am to TrueTiger
quote:
but it denies them the gotcha
His mom response gives them a gotcha
quote:
and allows the doubt to linger
Not for their audience
It confirms what she wanted confirmed (election denial) and her audience will eat that up.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:15 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Big tech silencing the laptop story was part of the puzzle.
Seems this has just been swept under the rug and it should be one of the biggest political stories in our lifetime.
It proved collusion between govt and tech to destroy free speech.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Odd qualifiers create strawman responses. Try to respond without the editorializing.
she certainly not going to respond to a non-responsive and irrelevant question
Is the question "Are you trustworthy" relevant?
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But still irrelevant to her question.
tgat makes sense quote:
Again, he fell into her trap both ways,
You could also say she fell into his trap. Cause shes also an election denier
quote:
It's just bad in terms of logic/projection
No one cares but hard core leftist
quote:
Either Trump or Biden won.
Biden is Prez so he won. Its why the quesrion is the dumbest ever
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:27 am to FLTech
I would have probably asked additional questions: “Can you explain to me what safeguards were in place to provide transparency for massive mail-in voting?”
“Which courts engaged in a full adjudication and fact-finding determination on any significant voting irregularities?”
“Do you think the middle-of-the-night vote counting that exponentially went in favor of Biden in key swing states raised any questions? And if not do you exercise that level of credulity in your every day affairs? And if so would you like to buy some beachfront property from me in Ohio?”
“Do the laptop revelations coupled with gazzillions of dollars laundered in Ukraine immediately following Biden’s phony inauguration raise any questions on your smooth brain?”
“Have you ever seen a grown man naked? Been in a Ukrainian prison?”
“Which courts engaged in a full adjudication and fact-finding determination on any significant voting irregularities?”
“Do you think the middle-of-the-night vote counting that exponentially went in favor of Biden in key swing states raised any questions? And if not do you exercise that level of credulity in your every day affairs? And if so would you like to buy some beachfront property from me in Ohio?”
“Do the laptop revelations coupled with gazzillions of dollars laundered in Ukraine immediately following Biden’s phony inauguration raise any questions on your smooth brain?”
“Have you ever seen a grown man naked? Been in a Ukrainian prison?”
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Remember freedom fries?
All the anti-Muslim rhetoric was targeted at the emotional lower class
And you still have a bunch of Evangelicals who support Israel more htan the US at times.
Anti-muslim rhetoric directed after Muslims killed 3000 citizens? Checks out.
Evangelical Christians supporting Israel more than themselves? Retarded. Even for you.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 9:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Odd qualifiers create strawman responses
Descriptive qualifiers.
quote:
Try to respond without the editorializing.
I answered the question you asked.
You just don't like the answer.
quote:
Is the question "Are you trustworthy" relevant?
She asked a binary question of his view.
Given the paradigm of that question, her trustworthiness is irrelevant. Perhaps had she not asked a simple, binary question, this would apply. Certainly if she was editorializing or giving opinions/framing, this would apply. However, neither were present.
It was a binary, yes/no question.
Page 10 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News