- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JD Vance does not back down to this scumbag NY Times Reporter
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You realize by not answering, it permits them to push that agenda, right
What question hasnt he answered?
2
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I see it differently.
How devolving himself into Leftist dishonesty is spun as a good thing makes no sense to me.
He said he would answer her question.
She ignored the terms.
The terms were, "give me some indication of journalistic integrity, otherwise, at best, you're not worth my time."
She refused. Why?
If she truly wanted an answer to her question, why not answer his?
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:20 am to SDVTiger
quote:
What question hasnt he answered?
Ignore touchdown SFP.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:20 am to ronricks
quote:
Gavin Newsom win in 2028
He will never sniff the white house, unless it's with Hunter on a cocaine binge.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:21 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
If he answers in the manner in which she wants him to answer
Nothing requires him to be stupid and answer in a stupid manner.
He doesn't have to "answer in the manner in which she wants him to answer" while still directly responding to the quesiton.
This is the problem with MAGA-rhetoric. There's a default fear of looking dumb (for obvious reasons) and they immediately devolve to whataboutism.
A guy like JD Vance should be better than the typical MAGA NPCs who have to rely on this crutch due to intellectual shortcomings.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:21 am to SDVTiger
quote:
What question hasnt he answered?
In that clip, he did not answer "Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?"
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:22 am to ronricks
quote:
I’ve NEVER said this.
You did say it and then edited your post when I called you on it.
Now you’re pretending you didn’t say it. Like a bitch.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're still in the driver's seats. That's how we got a tax cut and regulatory reform last time Trump was in office, and how the Supreme Court got flipped. Trump was a useful pawn in the GOPE's big political game. I'm happy Trump didn't get in the way.
And they wouldn’t have got it done without him. Works both ways.
This thread and conversation is about the presidential race.
Why have conservatives failed to bring someone forward since 2008 who could effectively capture the base and promote the cause?
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:22 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
He said he would answer her question.
She ignored the terms.
He isn't so stupid he needs this crutch. That's the problem.
quote:
The terms were, "give me some indication of journalistic integrity, otherwise, at best, you're not worth my time."
She refused. Why?
Because that is completely non-responsive to the question and devolving to whataboutism.
That's a crutch for dumb people.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
I’m 100% certain you aren’t a person that the Trump campaign gives a shite about their opinion. And they shouldn’t.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
What ticket would be doing better with the young voters? What ticket would have the young voters this engaged in an election?
Everybody knows that the #1 reason Trunp is doing so well with the young voters is because of Barron Trump so if Trump was not on this ticket, then there would be no young voter support
Everybody knows that the #1 reason Trunp is doing so well with the young voters is because of Barron Trump so if Trump was not on this ticket, then there would be no young voter support
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is the problem with MAGA-rhetoric. There's a default fear of looking dumb (for obvious reasons) and they immediately devolve to whataboutism.
A guy like JD Vance should be better than the typical MAGA NPCs who have to rely on this crutch due to intellectual shortcomings.
It wasn’t a question. It was a painting, and he didn’t play by her rules and messed up her little painting of Trump/Vance for her audience.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In that clip, he did not answer
Good thats the dumbest question ever
Why didnt she answer his?
You and maybe a bunch of other leftists would be the only ones to think he was dumb for not playing along with their stupid
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:25 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Why have conservatives failed to bring someone forward since 2008 who could effectively capture the base and promote the cause?
They weren't likely winning in 2008 or 2012 due to 2 GOP terms, and then won in 2016 b/c the DEMS were coming off 2 DEM terms.
Obama was also a political phenomenon, like Trump in 2016. Nobody was beating him. Like Trump, he was down the list of party favorites and ran roughshod in the primaries b/c of how adept he is at being a campaigning politician. In office he became beloved to the majority of the country.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:25 am to the808bass
quote:
I’m 100% certain you aren’t a person that the Trump campaign gives a shite about their opinion.
Yes. MAGA does not target the educated or highly intelligent. I'm not disagreeing and have said the same many times.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:27 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Good thats the dumbest question ever
You asked me what the question was
If he's not going to answer questions he shouldn't be sitting down with journos who will....ask him questions.
quote:
Why didnt she answer his?
It wasn't responsive or even on-topic. Plus like in court, she's the one asking questions. That's the paradigm of a media interview.
If he wants a free flowing conversation, I'm sure there are many podcasts who would take him (like Trump is doing).
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:28 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
It wasn’t a question.
It was a question.
quote:
and he didn’t play by her rules
You mean he refused to answer a simple question? For an interview he agreed to where the point was him being...asked questions?
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No. It really isn't. He's placing trust that what this woman puts in print will have some semblance of truth. That requires a modicum of integrity on her part. JD engaged in a trust but verify exercise. She refused. Why?
and devolving to whataboutism.
This post was edited on 10/12/24 at 8:31 am
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:31 am to ronricks
quote:
I like Vance and he is a sharp guy just a shame he has hitched his wagon to an idiot like Trump.
Just pull the lever for Trump for JD's sake.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If he's not going to answer questions he shouldn't be sitting down with journos who will....ask him questions.
You shouldnt be a journo if you are asking tard questions about the past
She got the answer she deserved. Its triggers leftists
Interwsting
quote:
It wasn't responsive or even on-topic
It was specifically about the topic
Page 8 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News