- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith has done it again. He did not consider exculpatory evidence at all.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 5:35 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 8/4/23 at 5:35 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
not wasting the tax payer’s money and harassing a private citizen?
what could be exculpatory?
set us up for the scotus presentation.
give two examples pray tell.
is this where eastman told him it was a good theory?
or when Eastman told pence it was just a minor crime.
speculate for us.
what could it possibly be?
i hope this is on tv.
3
Posted on 8/4/23 at 5:45 pm to CelticDog
quote:
what could be exculpatory?
set us up for the scotus presentation.
give two examples pray tell.
is this where eastman told him it was a good theory?
or when Eastman told pence it was just a minor crime.
speculate for us.
what could it possibly be?
i hope this is on tv.
anything that weakens the government's case
WHy should anybody give you ANYTHING. You lie constantly and never give any evidence of anything.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:28 pm to CelticDog
frick I thought Decatur was a retard.
You out performed him.
You out performed him.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:32 pm to FriscoTiger1973
quote:
He doesn’t have to, Trump will have the opportunity to present that at the trial, not that it will make any difference. He will be convicted and have to appeal to the USSC.
There needs to be serious consequences for this kind of abuse of power.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:34 pm to Jbird
quote:
frick I thought Decatur was a retard.
You out performed him.
Sometimes I wish this forum had a "hide poster" function or just an automatic downvote for ideologically motivated idiots.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:35 pm to Timeoday
The charges are ridiculous
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:35 pm to Jbird
quote:
A special council doesn't?
You mean the legal scholar didn’t reply? What a shock.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:40 pm to Warboo
quote:
The SCOTUS is licking their chops to smack that idiot again. He already took a 9-0 beating there. Setting up nicely to have round two.
Link?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:41 pm to rhar61
quote:
Who is the gullible idiot again?
Green Chili??
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:41 pm to Timeoday
Heckin love DJT 
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He doesn't have to give it any sort of weight.
Don’t you think this might be important when trying to jail your political opposition?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:58 pm to BBONDS25
quote:A bunch of papers where people express concern for the 2020 election from a Trump crony loon? One that was only delivered a few days before Trump got his indictment?
He absolutely does. Attorneys have ethical rules they have to abide by. Prosecutors too. DOJ manual covers it as well. Ignoring exculpatory evidence would violate the duty under JM 9-27.220
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:03 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Don’t you think this might be important when trying to jail your political opposition?
I have stated this is clearly the weakest of all the criminal prosecutions and there is clear partisanship involved.
Be that as it may, he clearly thinks he has enough to prove intent. As of now Trump's defense is the "Dindu Nuffin" one, so it's not exactly stellar. This may change over time, but some random documents that "may" be exculpatory produced by a likely partisan person don't exactly blow up the case.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:56 pm to Timeoday
Doesn’t matter what SCOTUS does, he will be forever maintained as a national hero.
That’s the sad truth
That’s the sad truth
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:03 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Seems like the grand jury should have been made privy to that evidence.
Grand juries don't have to see any evidence provided by the defense. They only get to see the evidence the prosecution brings. Grand juries aren't juries. They are filters used to decide if a case warrants going to trial.
Again, no one on the prosecution/left/establishment side of this cares if the conviction sticks forever. They just need it to stick during the time frame of September to November 2024.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:05 pm to Hayekian serf
You can thank a politicized DOJ for his hero status.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 8:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Supports weaponizing government against political opponents. And not believing a defendants theory is VERY different than ignoring exculpatory evidence. Not that you care. You would have done well in the 40s.
Bad faith and dishonesty is definitely your calling card…along with moronic analysis.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 9:04 pm to Strannix
quote:
Jack Smith is a fricking clown with a long track record of getting pimp slapped
And being a tool of the left wing filth.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 10:47 pm to cwill
quote:I think he nailed it
Bad faith and dishonesty is definitely your calling card…along with moronic analysis.
'
right on your big nose
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News