- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/5/23 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP, I would agree that this case is the weakest but I fear this one more than the documents case is where the biggest barrage will come from because the potential penalties are so much greater.
However in this case, Trump could take a situation wherein if he just held his tongue he could walk but he will continue to trip over his own dick.
However in this case, Trump could take a situation wherein if he just held his tongue he could walk but he will continue to trip over his own dick.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 8:31 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
think he nailed it
'
right on your big nose
Your obsession with Jewish people and having to interject anti-semitic comments in every thread you post in is quite amazing. That level of obsession is rare
Posted on 8/5/23 at 8:45 am to rhar61
quote:
You lie constantly and never give any evidence of anything.
big talk.
lets take trumps 3 x since 2020 calls to be reinstated without further ado. dont worry about the constitution.
quote:
Trump demands reinstatement as 'rightful' president or 'a new Election, immediately!' as some Republicans seek distance from him
Nicole Gaudiano
Aug 29, 2022, 4:38 PM ET
how do you defend that?
head in the sand?
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 8:51 am
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:17 am to MightyYat
quote:
Everything they've tried has been filled with a comedy of errors. It's why I don't understand either side getting worked up over any of this. It's all for show. Nothing more.
I'm beginning to develop a new take on this whole thing. It's becoming rather obvious to everyone, despite media attempts to hide or disguise it, that Biden is, and has been, in China's pocket for some time. (To quote/paraphrase Roger Waters: "Every man has his price [Joe], and yours was pretty low.")
China is actively engaged in bringing about the downfall of the United States. Biden, and many, many others, have been on the receiving end of China's gifts of late. If that news makes it to the mainstream and the facts come out, they are literally and legitimately at risk of being hanged.
This ain't just Joe and his DOJ calling the shots. This is China and its paid employees (both elected officials and bureaucrats) within our federal government doing everything within their power to prevent being exposed.
This s*** runs a whole lot deeper than I think any of us ever considered, and it's pretty damned hard to comprehend it even now. We aren't waking up from a nightmare these days. We're waking up INTO a nightmare.
Our nation's government and security is severely compromised, and our very sovereignty is at grave risk.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 9:28 am
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:36 am to CelticDog
quote:
You lie constantly and never give any evidence of anything.
big talk.
lets take trumps 3 x since 2020 calls to be reinstated without further ado. dont worry about the constitution.
quote:
Trump demands reinstatement as 'rightful' president or 'a new Election, immediately!' as some Republicans seek distance from him
Nicole Gaudiano
Aug 29, 2022, 4:38 PM ET
how do you defend that?
head in the sand?
He along with the majority of the public believe he is the legitimate president. No head in the sand needed.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:38 am to CelticDog
quote:Because anyone with even a bit of honesty knows Biden didn't get 81M legit votes.
how do you defend that?
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:33 am to Diamondawg
The level of seethe and cope on these threads is wild. Out in the open.
Trump's guys think they have something exculpatory. The prosecutor doesn't. Will a jury think so? I guess we'll find out.
This isn't a Brady violation, which is a huge deal, as undisclosed Brady material will result in a prosection being overturned. Because of Brady prosecutors take a very expansive view of what could be exculpatory and send everything to the defense.
This expansive interpretation of what is exculpatory won't apply in reverse. The prosecutor can take a more objective view of material sent by the defense, since the defense already has it, and there's no risk.
This case is going to harm Trump more than the others combined. Regardless of whether he is convicted, it will come out that he never believed he won the election and has been lying to fundraise off the outrage.
Is he seriously going to go with a first amendment/ineffective counsel line of defense? Or is that just another lie to get the rubes to give up more money?
Trump's guys think they have something exculpatory. The prosecutor doesn't. Will a jury think so? I guess we'll find out.
This isn't a Brady violation, which is a huge deal, as undisclosed Brady material will result in a prosection being overturned. Because of Brady prosecutors take a very expansive view of what could be exculpatory and send everything to the defense.
This expansive interpretation of what is exculpatory won't apply in reverse. The prosecutor can take a more objective view of material sent by the defense, since the defense already has it, and there's no risk.
This case is going to harm Trump more than the others combined. Regardless of whether he is convicted, it will come out that he never believed he won the election and has been lying to fundraise off the outrage.
Is he seriously going to go with a first amendment/ineffective counsel line of defense? Or is that just another lie to get the rubes to give up more money?
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:33 am to BBONDS25
He didn’t answer your question if politically motivated? 
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:36 am to Mephistopheles
quote:
Trump's guys think they have something exculpatory. The prosecutor doesn't.
Allegedly the prosecutor didn’t even look at what was provided.
quote:
This isn't a Brady violation
Nobody said it was. It is a breach of his prosecutorial duties according to the DOJ manual, though.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 10:37 am
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:38 am to Mephistopheles
quote:
This case is going to harm Trump more than the others combined. Regardless of whether he is convicted, it will come out that he never believed he won the election and has been lying to fundraise off the outrage.
This is pure speculation on your part. It may turn out to be the exact opposite. He will be able to finally present the evidence in court where in the past they have not.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your obsession with Jewish people and having to interject anti-semitic comments in every thread you post in is quite amazing. That level of obsession is rare
It appears you are over obsessed with calling any comment that could be construed as negativity towards a Jew as anti-semitic.
That is not how it works bro. People can say whatever they want about whom or whatever they want.
Just don't yell "fire" in a theater or scream I dropped an ice chest full of raw pork chops in a synagogue.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 11:26 am to Timeoday
Posted on 8/5/23 at 11:51 am to Mephistopheles
quote:And it's amazing how most of the lawyers on here can't even agree on what this all adds up to be. It is 100% down political lines 1) Trump haters and 2) Trump non-haters or supporters.
The level of seethe and cope on these threads is wild. Out in the open.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 12:15 pm to Diamondawg
Heck I figured one of them could tell me if a special council must look at exculpatory evidence prior to a grand jury.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 12:47 pm to Jbird
quote:I've decided that many are going back to their law school days because all they do is family law or real estate.
Heck I figured one of them could tell me if a special council must look at exculpatory evidence prior to a grand jury.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 1:29 pm to Timeoday
Posted on 8/5/23 at 2:42 pm to Timeoday
There is no 'independence' about any part of this prosecution.
It is everything as horrible as any 2 bit dictator in any banana republic. It's an insult to banana republics.
It is everything as horrible as any 2 bit dictator in any banana republic. It's an insult to banana republics.
quote:
.
@kayleighmcenany
: "Biden privately told aides that Trump should be prosecuted for January 6th and that he wanted Merrick Garland to take decisive action...
That is an explosive allegation buried in the New York Times...
Why are they silent about their own reporting that Joe Biden wanted to see a January 6th indictment of his chief political rival?"
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News