re: Jabs increase risk for 7 major types of cancer

There's enough of them out there you go find them. I'm not going to cater to your laziness or help you get through your cognitive dissonance.

The only people believing this shite anymore are the ones who took it and need it for survival or their fricking heads will explode that their Lord Government and mass media lied to them.

I'm sorry you were duped though.

But frick off. Seriously, DIAF if you still want to push this on innocent people.

It's your bed. Sleep in it!

quote:

---

The studies in question were observational and identified statistical associations, which the authors and health experts emphasize do not prove a causal link. The observed associations can be attributed to confounding factors and limitations within the studies' methodologies:

Observational Data: The studies noted epidemiological associations but explicitly stated that further research was warranted to explore potential causal links.

Confounding Factors: Researchers pointed to the "healthy vaccine bias" (vaccinated people generally interact more with the healthcare system and are more likely to have pre-existing conditions recorded) as a potential explanation for the findings.

---

This is NOT a study that any reputable medical professional would draw conclusions from. These kind of associative studies are conducted to try to find things to more seriously study. This one is particularly unreliable because it does not adjust for obvious confounding factors. For example: Those with precarious health were more likely to get vaccines and are more likely to get cancer regardless of the vaccines.

This will turn out to be false, and everyone on here carping about it will be no where to be seen - what Rush would have called Drive by Posters.

Trust in St. Fauci, huh??

quote:

---

bullshite! It’s always stuff like this “study”. A week from now you will vaguely remember this thread as about a serious study that showed vaccines are dangerous. But it’s not. Same with the ones you claim are “out there”. They’re not. I’ve read enough of them to know that they are either not peer reviewed or they are the associative type studies that are meant to produce suspicions not conclusions.

---

The onus isn't on me to prove that the COVID vaccine was safe and effective.
It's on you.

Now if you're intention is to be self serving cheap arse go join a support group for vaccine injured people or hire a therapist to talk to.

But to post your bullshite on a board to gain some kind of echo chamber confidence for your own past decisions should make you feel shame.

And those of us who know the truth will shame and humiliate you repeatedly.

That goes for the so-called "bone doctor" who repeatedly acts like an expert on the subject. Whose hubris for becoming a doctor is blinded by his very profession being one of the most least respected in today's world and nobody trusts.

quote:

---

I’m not saying that the vaccines don’t have side effects and sometimes cause bad health outcomes and even death.

---

Then STFU. Because that's what this thread is about.

quote:

---

In young healthy cohorts, vaccines have been shown to be marginal to negative.

---

Cohort this

quote:

---

I don't have a vest. But I am a pure-blood!!

---

Get in the truck then

quote:

---

That goes for the so-called "bone doctor" who repeatedly acts like an expert on the subject.

---

Compared to a dude with an undergrad engineering degree? Absolutely.

quote:

---

Whose hubris for becoming a doctor is blinded by his very profession being one of the most least respected in today's world and nobody trusts.

---

Ahhh it’s making sense now. I’m guessing your ex-boyfriend who cheated on you was a doctor and now you just so scorned. It’s OK; you can get through this!

quote:

---

This is why nobody wants to take time out of their day to go do YOUR research. Anything that is posted you will dismiss to feed your confirmation bias.

---

Buddy, please take a minute to think about this. You can test what I’m telling you by talking to any of your friends who are doctors. I am confidant that any doctor would have a 95% chance of verifying what I am telling you, which is this:

The medical community does different types of studies with very different levels of rigor. The study that is the subject of this thread is of the least rigorous kind. These studies are designed, not to draw conclusions, but to fish for statistical anomalies that could bear further studying. This particular study has not accounted for known confounding factors, which are very impactful as I explained in my post above.

Now, dopes will cite this study and others, who are not equipped to understand what they are looking at, will buy it. And all it does is muddy the water. I’m not saying the study is worthless. Data scientists will take that raw data and apply known confounding factors, and the 60% increase in this, and the 40% increase in that, will largely, or probably completely. disappear.

BTW, I was vehemently against vax mandates; I was angry at recommendations that school children be vaccinated; I never social distanced (except when forced to); and I lived large all through the pandemic. I was an early proponent of the lab leak hypothesis, etc.

quote:

---

Yes, as an MD, I consider myself an expert in medicine.

---

I was sitting with my father in an examination room at MD Anderson last week discussing possible courses of treatment with his oncologist.

My father lives in the metro Atlanta area, so he asked the oncologist what he thought about the possibility of receiving treatment in Atlanta.

The oncologist said he could not speak on the quality of the doctors available in metro Atlanta as he does not know them personally nor was he aware of their reputation. He said “I expect many of them to be very good doctors, I expect many of them to be fine, and I expect some of them to be not so good. Emory has a good reputation, from papers I read, I assume they hire good people. But I can’t specifically speak for them.”

We met an old family acquaintance from Louisiana at MD Anderson, in between appointments. He is there currently receiving treatment for prostate cancer. He said that he never had symptoms until he was on a rig out in the Gulf and urinated completely red blood. He had undergone yearly physicals. His doctor never asked him about or requested a PSA test or checked him for prostate cancer. He’s 65. He now has stage 4 prostate cancer that has spread to his bones, head, elbows, spine.

I’m 48 and my doctor shoves his fingers up my hole every year to feel my prostate then pats me on the back and says “sorry about that.” He also orders a PSA with my bloodwork.

The point being with these CSBs is that I’ve become aware that there are good doctors and bad doctors. Just because someone has MD after her/his name does not mean she/he is good at her job.

Moreover, the ridiculous actions taken by many in the medical establishment over the past few years have eroded the faith that a lot of people had in the medical community. It’s unfortunate the damage the medical community has inflicted upon itself.

One of my best friends from college, all the way back to Millsaps, is an orthopedic surgeon. He was always an outstanding student. Summa cum laude bachelors, went to law school to be a tax lawyer but decided it wasn’t for him so withdrew after first semester. Got a masters in physical therapy from UMC and worked as a PT for a few years then earned his MD at UMC. Finished there as chief resident then completed a fellowship at UW in Seattle in hand surgery.

When Covid was happening and the vaccines came out, he was one of the select few I consulted. I asked him if he had any concerns about the vaccines. He said “It depends. If I’m 75 or if I have health issues, then no, I’m not too concerned. If I’m a healthy 45 year old, then yes, I have concerns about taking the vaccines. Because no one knows what the long term effects of these vaccines are and if they say they do, they’re lying to you.”

My godfather is a retired MD (OBGYN). He was very pro Covid vaccine when they came out. Now, not so much. He’s much more cautious about them.

Much lower all-cause mortality in the vaccinated

quote:

---

Overall, 6512 subjects died during the follow-up (2.20% of the sample; Table 2(Tab. 2)). The mortality among the unvaccinated (3.56%) was much higher than among those who received at least one dose (1.93%; p<0.001; chi-squared test) or at least three vaccine doses (1.30% vs. 2.07% in the unvaccinated; p<0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed univariate results, showing a significantly lower risk of death for the group "=1 dose" (HR: 0.42; 95% CI 0.39-0.44) and for the group "=3 doses" (HR: 0.65; 0.62-0.67; Table 3(Tab. 3)), as compared with the unvaccinated.

---