Started By
Message

re: Jab shedding

Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6091 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

fixated on finding problems with the vaccines.


Nah, real men saw the problem BEFORE that turned them down.

Only an absolute moron would think there aren't problems now
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15208 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

I’m not an expert but I imagine that it matters to the people
that it killed.


But the idea of shedding is it impacts you whether you got the vaccine or not.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17908 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 5:48 am to
quote:

this phenomenon is real,


It's no phenomenon.............It was all a planned operation and it worked, until it got exposed and none of the people pushing/advocating for EVERYBODY to protect you loved ones took the frickin shot, they knew they had immunity frick all of these people ...
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55182 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Only an absolute moron would think there aren't problems now

I asked your daddy and chatGPT said…
quote:

Serious side effects from Pfizer’s COVID vaccine appear to be rare, not pervasive. In U.S. safety monitoring, the main serious adverse events clearly linked to the mRNA vaccines are anaphylaxis and myocarditis/pericarditis. CDC says anaphylaxis occurs at about 5 cases per 1 million doses, and FDA’s current labeling says myocarditis/pericarditis after the 2023–2024 mRNA formulation was about 8 cases per 1 million doses overall in people 6 months to 64 years old, rising to about 27 cases per 1 million doses in males age 12–24. The group with the clearest elevated risk is adolescent and young adult males, usually within about a week after vaccination. FDA and CDC both state that this is the highest-risk subgroup for vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis. For most people who do develop vaccine-associated myocarditis, outcomes are generally favorable, though not trivial. CDC says most patients respond well to medicine and rest and feel better quickly, and surveys cited by CDC found about 80% were considered by their cardiologist or clinician to have fully or probably fully recovered after at least 3 months. FDA also notes that some follow-up cardiac MRI abnormalities have persisted in a subset of patients, and the long-term significance of those findings is still uncertain. CDC’s current safety page also says it has not found an increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after Pfizer or Moderna vaccines; that signal was associated with the older J&J vaccine instead. So, in plain terms: for the average adult, serious side effects from Pfizer’s COVID vaccine are uncommon to very uncommon. They are most relevant if you are a male roughly 12–24, especially around dose timing, or if you have a history of severe allergic reaction to a prior dose or one of the vaccine ingredients.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6091 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:43 am to
Yep, and if you keep drilling down, especially in kids, it get worse and worse quth many smarter countries banning certain brands.

And good Ole USA was, at 9ne point, basically recommending it for toddlers

quote:

In the U.S., the vaccination rollout for children went in stages, but it ultimately extended to very young ages:
Age 16+ – first authorized (late 2020, early 2021)
Age 12–15 – expanded in May 2021 (with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine)
Age 5–11 – authorized November 2021
Age 6 months–4 years – authorized June 2022 (both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines)
So the youngest group the U.S. authorized and encouraged vaccination for was infants as young as 6 months old.
This was based on clinical trials reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which weighed risks of COVID infection vs. vaccine safety in each age group.


And your glorious FDA was saying it was safe.

They should all hang. They were bought off
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55182 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:59 am to
quote:

And good Ole USA was, at 9ne point, basically recommending it for toddlers

That was always nuts and shameful. The data showed almost zero serious consequences from covid in any person under ten years old.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3392 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:02 am to
Sort of off topic. When they started the COVID shots, were they given some people the placebo(not the actual COVID shot. Isn't that why they were tracking the actual shots to each person?

Is there a way to know if you were given the placebo or the covid shot?

If they were giving some the placebo, that makes the purpose of the shot and the "shot card" to participate in society a bigger scam than it already is.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2691 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:19 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Even Elon succumbed to the pressure?

How hard was it back then to say 'no, I'm not injecting an experimental drug into my body.'

The Nuremberg Code, natural law and every doctrine of medical ethics ran in your favor but the coercion was overwhelming.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11840 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:24 am to
Not a dumb question - it’s mixing two different phases of how these things get tested vs used.

In the clinical trials early on, some people did get placebo so they could compare outcomes. But once the vaccines were authorized and rolled out to the public, everyone getting a shot was getting the actual vaccine.

The tracking (lot numbers, cards, etc.) is more about safety and logistics - if there’s a batch issue or side effect signal, they can trace it, not about assigning placebo vs. real in the public rollout.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 9:25 am
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7678 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Jab shedding

So is this like an STD, and reason to wrap it up with vaxxed chick??

One thing a pureblood can find solace in is that their Dr does not have to try to figure out how the vaxx may or may not be effecting their bodies. It's traditional pre-covid vaxx medical attention.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7678 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

It’s no coincidence that all these HIV commercials started running rampant at the same time the jab came came out.

I feel the same way about the shingles vaccine.
Posted by Gunny Hartman
Member since Jan 2021
1106 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

The good news is that you can tell when a vaccinated person is near you because they smell like rotting human flesh.


I thought it was because of the myocarditis. Guess one leads to the other.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2691 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

commercials


Total domination of prescription drug TV commercials since covid. You cant watch a game without a reminder of cancer and every other affliction known to man every 4-minutes.

You got to conclude that Americans are the world's lab rats. No other country allows this.

Are the drug companies buying silence? So long as the money keeps flowing we wont report on the soft-genocide?
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
11069 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:52 am to
They are starting to use this vax technology in dog vaccines. So they are projecting that your dog can shed this crap to you as well.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15783 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 11:22 am to
I think the solution here is pretty obvious. Place everyone that took the jab in camps or on a island.
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 11:42 am to
Fellow Pureblood checking in
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17480 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 11:43 am to
So many plot holes but I guess if you suspend thought it's entertaining
Posted by MBclass83
Member since Oct 2010
10248 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 1:58 pm to
I need to know what exactly is being shed. Im a science person so go ahead and use big words.

Nevermind. This only can happen with live attenuated vaccines, of which covid vaccine is not.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 2:02 pm
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11840 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 2:28 pm to
That’s actually the right starting question - what would even be doing the shedding?

Traditional vaccine shedding involves a weakened live virus replicating, which doesn’t apply here.

The confusion seems to come from people lumping together a few different ideas - side effects, spike protein discussions, proximity/timing - and treating them as if they imply transmission between people. That’s a much bigger leap.
Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
2648 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 2:54 pm to
Gtfo, there is no covid but there damn sure is a so called vaccine that has maimed and murdered millions. Virology is pseudoscientific bs.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram