- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: J6 prisoner speaks out. ‘I have been held 1000 days without trial.’
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:19 am to Jake88
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:19 am to Jake88
quote:
Are you suggesting that the extreme leftist DA Jason Williams and his merry band are purposely keeping this info from their clients? Why?
I’m not sure how often Jason Williams meets with defendants. Public defenders are overwhelmed. I’m not saying they are purposely not doing extra work to ensure a speedy trial, but I imagine they don’t have the capacity to do it.
1
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:19 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:Good. I'd hate to see you worked up then.
I am as calm as a Bhuddist monk in lotus, bitch
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:21 am to 4cubbies
quote:Only when he has a big shot at publicity, probably.
I’m not sure how often Jason Williams meets with defendants
quote:This doesn't explain why they wouldn't file. File, get it over. But, again, it's likely an effective tactic by the defense.
Public defenders are overwhelmed. I’m not saying they are purposely not doing extra work to ensure a speedy trial, but I imagine they don’t have the capacity to do it
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:21 am to Jake88
Jake you are right about the Q things being conspiracies, but you are wrong about the J6 prisoners not having their human rights (and constitutional right) violated.
Our founding fathers would be livid about their treatment.
Eta : maybe I misread - I'm a mess today and need to stop piddling on TD and work some
Our founding fathers would be livid about their treatment.
Eta : maybe I misread - I'm a mess today and need to stop piddling on TD and work some
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 11:23 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:24 am to Jake88
quote:yeah yeah
What are you talking about? I listed conspiracies that were BS and this is your response?
and your position that you know more than a published expert in a field in which you apparently have ZERO clues is your standard....
387-0 applies, moron
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 11:35 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:24 am to Jake88
quote:that’s my assumption, too.
Only when he has a big shot at publicity, probably.
quote:they probably don’t have the time to do it. Their caseloads are so large that they may not even realize someone has been detained for so long. It could possibly be a defense strategy but I can’t assume that’s the case for everyone. I’d need to see some corroboration from an actual defense attorney or defendant.
This doesn't explain why they wouldn't file. File, get it over.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:26 am to oogabooga68
quote:
Other than YOUR biases, what makes him unreliable?
The irony of this is that you people question and/or outright deny anything and everything that doesn’t fit your narrative
But you gobble up the stuff that makes you feel good without a moment’s pause.
If you don’t think the details he gave are a little dubious, then I question your awareness on many, many things. Has nothing to do with bias.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:27 am to 4cubbies
quote:ah the oopsy daisy defensy
cwill
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:27 am to SirWinston
quote:I didn't say they didn't have rights violated. I said I didn't believe everything this guy was saying. I also took note that he has delayed his trial in order to get a matter heard by the Supreme Court. That's it. I've also suggested that some in this thread are always emotional and gullible when reading things like this.
Jake you were right about the Q things being conspiracies, but you are wrong about the J6 prisoners not having their human rights (and constitutional right) violated.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:32 am to Jake88
quote:'suggested'?
suggested that some in this thread are always emotional and gullible
You didnt suggest it LIAR
You declared yourself superior in a field in which I have been published and worked in for years
and then in your perpetual tone deaf nature - implied I needed 'therapy'
as belligerent as any belligerent I ever see on this board.
You are undoubtedly a tone deaf piece of schidt..
'suggested'... lol
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:34 am to theunknownknight
Trump said they were peaceful protesters. Are they antifa or peaceful protesters? Pick one.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:38 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:Post the link.
and your position that you know more than a published expert in a field in which you apparently have clue is your standard....
quote:I can already see the signs "Trump/JFK Jr. '24." It will be a glorious 3rd term since theorists say he's actually running the government in exile.
387-0 applies, moron
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Then you said.
I don't understand why it's so difficult for you to understand if he believes one charge is illegal (and, apparently, unwinnable at trial), his choice to fight that and delay the trial is some ulterior motive of the government.
He can choose to fight this charge via a speedier trial or fighting this charge via motion. What other option are you presenting? I've directly asked you this before point blank and you have offered nothing.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:42 am to Jake88
quote:what is this masturbatory joke you have running?
Jake88
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:42 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Incredible that video evidence can be biased based on who is holding the phone recording the video. Jesus that's so stupid.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:But you seem to be assuming that the defendents are unaware of this option.
It could possibly be a defense strategy but I can’t assume that’s the case for everyone
quote:I bieve they have status hearings. When a continuance is granted, a date for a return to court is set right then. It could be months in the future but it us set. The defender knows how long things drag because they are the ones checking their calender at that moment.
Their caseloads are so large that they may not even realize someone has been detained for so long
Ultimately, what is your solution?
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:43 am to Jake88
quote:bet me I am not published in that field
and your position that you know more than a published expert in a field in which you apparently have clue is your standard....
Post the link.
bet me
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:44 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
well, he's specifically contesting corruption
Newsweek
quote:
He is asking the justices to hear his appeal of one of the 11 charges he was indicted on: obstruction of an official proceeding
Just the News
quote:
defendant Edward Jacob Lang is asking the Supreme Court to hear his challenge against one of the 11 charges he was indicted on – obstruction of an official proceeding
I can post more. Where are you getting "corruption" from?
quote:
Show us a video of Lang obstructing an official proceeding.
Being part of the riot is enough, per the legal theory of the prosecution.
Law and Crime article on it
quote:
Prosecutors have argued that while the enumerated offenses in the first subsection are specifically aimed at actions like destroying evidence, the second subsection, starting with the word “otherwise,” is meant to essentially be a “catchall” to address any other action, “corruptly” taken, to block “any official proceeding.”
Defendants have argued that the statute is confined to actions such as destroying potentially incriminating documents, as consulting firm Arthur Anderson was found to have done on behalf of Enron as the then-crumbling energy company was starting to crumble, leading to what was then the largest corporate bankruptcy in the world.
During Monday’s appellate hearing before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Assistant U.S. Attorney James Pearce urged the judges to uphold the findings of at least 18 district court judges.
“The word ‘otherwise’ indicates that the provision encompasses conduct other than [document or evidence tampering],” Pearce argued. He was almost immediately cut off by Circuit Judge Gregory G. Katsas.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:44 am to JoeBobRuby
quote:When did you start doing that?
fricking hate this country
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:45 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:You've got the quote on this? I declared I'm superior in a field of photography? Or did I say forensic experts can be biased for a side?
You declared yourself superior in a field in which I have been published and worked in for years
Again, where is the link for this published study apparently you authored?
Page 17 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News